[Development and validation of Russian olfactory test].

Q3 Medicine
G V Lebedeva, M V Svistushkin, L V Selezneva, Yu N Muzychenko, A Yu Suvorov, I V Khutornoi, A V Pedder, V V Pedder, V A Kudryavtseva, K K Pogosyan
{"title":"[Development and validation of Russian olfactory test].","authors":"G V Lebedeva, M V Svistushkin, L V Selezneva, Yu N Muzychenko, A Yu Suvorov, I V Khutornoi, A V Pedder, V V Pedder, V A Kudryavtseva, K K Pogosyan","doi":"10.17116/otorino20248903141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olfactory disorders is one of the first symptoms of diseases from various departments of medicine (otorhinolaryngology, psychology, neurology, etc.). Based on international clinical recommendations, olfactory tests are the gold standard for the diagnosis of olfactory disorders. There are many different psychophysical tests: UPSIT (USA, Pennsylvania), Sniffin' Sticks test (Germany), BAST-24 (Spain), etc. Currently, there is an acute shortage of olfactory tests available for clinical practice In Russia. This problem is related to the fact that there are no olfactory tests registered as medical devices on the territory of the Russian Federation. Also, a significant limitation is the unrecognizability of odors by the population of our country, which include foreign analogues (licorice, anise, turpentine, etc.).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate the national olfactory test on healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The development and validation of the olfactory test included several stages. First, the development of an olfactory test was carried out, the selection of aromas to assess the threshold and identification ability of olfaction. 25 dilutions of <i>n</i>-butanol were used for the assessment of the threshold olfactory ability. For the stage of assessing the identification ability of the sense of smell, in our previous study, an assessment of the recognition of odor names in the territory of the Russian Federation was carried out. A total of 3.000 people from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation were interviewed. During the development of the test, 20 names of flavors with the highest rating were used. By the 8<sup>th</sup>, the selection of monocomponent substances was carried out. Commercially available certified food and perfume flavorings have been used for fragrances whose equivalent in the test cannot be a monocomponent substance. A group of 25 healthy volunteers selected a flavor or a monocomponent for each of the 20 positions. To carry out the identification stage of testing, a booklet was developed with answer options for each fragrance, including 80 images associated with the smell. A methodology for conducting diagnostics has been created. Next, the validation of the developed olfactory test was carried out on 150 healthy volunteers. The study included an assessment of the threshold and identification ability of the sense of smell using the developed test and conducting a comparative analysis with a set of flavors and descriptors corresponding to the Sniffin' Sticks test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed test includes: 2 panels - panel 1 to assess the threshold ability of smell, panel 2 to assess the identification ability of smell, a booklet with 80 images and captions to them. The norms of threshold and identification olfactory abilities were also determined in the developed test. The domestic test was validated against the relative foreign Sniffin' Sticks test. Spearman's correlation between the accuracy values of the domestic test (17-20; 85.00-100.00%) and the values of the foreign test (11-16; 68.75-100.00%) did not reveal statistically significant differences (<i>rs</i>=0.065, <i>p</i>=0.432), which confirms the equally effective assessment of olfactory ability by the domestic olfactory test in comparison with its foreign counterpart.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this work, a methodology for the use of Russian olfactory test was developed and validated on healthy volunteers. The features of the developed test are an assessment of the threshold and identification ability of smell, an adapted set of odors for the Russian population, the use of paper blotters when applying flavor and visual images of descriptors. Despite the wide variety of psychophysical tests, this problem requires further study and comparative analysis of olfactory tests available In Russia and foreign analogues in order to obtain a universal and effective diagnostic method for the populations of our country.</p><p><p>This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 24-25-00415).</p>","PeriodicalId":23575,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","volume":"89 3","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20248903141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfactory disorders is one of the first symptoms of diseases from various departments of medicine (otorhinolaryngology, psychology, neurology, etc.). Based on international clinical recommendations, olfactory tests are the gold standard for the diagnosis of olfactory disorders. There are many different psychophysical tests: UPSIT (USA, Pennsylvania), Sniffin' Sticks test (Germany), BAST-24 (Spain), etc. Currently, there is an acute shortage of olfactory tests available for clinical practice In Russia. This problem is related to the fact that there are no olfactory tests registered as medical devices on the territory of the Russian Federation. Also, a significant limitation is the unrecognizability of odors by the population of our country, which include foreign analogues (licorice, anise, turpentine, etc.).

Objective: To develop and validate the national olfactory test on healthy volunteers.

Material and methods: The development and validation of the olfactory test included several stages. First, the development of an olfactory test was carried out, the selection of aromas to assess the threshold and identification ability of olfaction. 25 dilutions of n-butanol were used for the assessment of the threshold olfactory ability. For the stage of assessing the identification ability of the sense of smell, in our previous study, an assessment of the recognition of odor names in the territory of the Russian Federation was carried out. A total of 3.000 people from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation were interviewed. During the development of the test, 20 names of flavors with the highest rating were used. By the 8th, the selection of monocomponent substances was carried out. Commercially available certified food and perfume flavorings have been used for fragrances whose equivalent in the test cannot be a monocomponent substance. A group of 25 healthy volunteers selected a flavor or a monocomponent for each of the 20 positions. To carry out the identification stage of testing, a booklet was developed with answer options for each fragrance, including 80 images associated with the smell. A methodology for conducting diagnostics has been created. Next, the validation of the developed olfactory test was carried out on 150 healthy volunteers. The study included an assessment of the threshold and identification ability of the sense of smell using the developed test and conducting a comparative analysis with a set of flavors and descriptors corresponding to the Sniffin' Sticks test.

Results: The developed test includes: 2 panels - panel 1 to assess the threshold ability of smell, panel 2 to assess the identification ability of smell, a booklet with 80 images and captions to them. The norms of threshold and identification olfactory abilities were also determined in the developed test. The domestic test was validated against the relative foreign Sniffin' Sticks test. Spearman's correlation between the accuracy values of the domestic test (17-20; 85.00-100.00%) and the values of the foreign test (11-16; 68.75-100.00%) did not reveal statistically significant differences (rs=0.065, p=0.432), which confirms the equally effective assessment of olfactory ability by the domestic olfactory test in comparison with its foreign counterpart.

Conclusion: In this work, a methodology for the use of Russian olfactory test was developed and validated on healthy volunteers. The features of the developed test are an assessment of the threshold and identification ability of smell, an adapted set of odors for the Russian population, the use of paper blotters when applying flavor and visual images of descriptors. Despite the wide variety of psychophysical tests, this problem requires further study and comparative analysis of olfactory tests available In Russia and foreign analogues in order to obtain a universal and effective diagnostic method for the populations of our country.

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 24-25-00415).

[俄罗斯嗅觉测试的开发与验证]。
嗅觉障碍是各医学科(耳鼻喉科、心理学、神经内科等)疾病的首发症状之一。根据国际临床建议,嗅觉测试是诊断嗅觉障碍的金标准。有许多不同的心理物理测试:UPSIT(美国宾夕法尼亚州)、嗅棒测试(德国)、BAST-24(西班牙)等。目前,俄罗斯严重缺乏可用于临床实践的嗅觉测试。这个问题与俄罗斯联邦境内没有作为医疗设备注册的嗅觉测试有关。此外,一个重要的限制因素是我国居民无法识别包括外国类似物(甘草、茴香、松节油等)在内的气味:材料和方法:嗅觉测试的开发和验证包括几个阶段。首先,进行嗅觉测试的开发,选择香气来评估嗅觉的阈值和识别能力。在评估嗅觉阈值能力时,使用了 25 份正丁醇稀释液。在评估嗅觉识别能力阶段,我们在之前的研究中对俄罗斯联邦境内的气味名称识别能力进行了评估。共对来自俄罗斯联邦 8 个联邦区的 3000 人进行了访谈。在测试过程中,使用了 20 个评分最高的气味名称。到第 8 次时,对单成分物质进行了筛选。对于在测试中不能使用单组分物质的香料,则使用了市售的经认证的食品和香水香料。一组 25 名健康志愿者在 20 个位置上各选择了一种香料或一种单组分物质。为了进行鉴定阶段的测试,我们编制了一本小册子,为每种香味提供了答案选项,包括 80 张与气味相关的图片。诊断方法已经制定。接下来,在 150 名健康志愿者身上对所开发的嗅觉测试进行了验证。研究包括使用所开发的测试评估嗅觉的阈值和识别能力,并与一套与嗅棒测试相对应的香味和描述符进行比较分析:开发的测试包括2 个面板--面板 1 用于评估嗅觉的阈值能力,面板 2 用于评估嗅觉的识别能力,还有一本包含 80 张图片和图片说明的小册子。在开发的测试中还确定了嗅觉阈值和识别能力的标准。国内测试与国外相对的 Sniffin' Sticks 测试进行了验证。国内测试的准确度值(17-20;85.00-100.00%)与国外测试的准确度值(11-16;68.75-100.00%)之间的斯皮尔曼相关性没有显示出统计学上的显著差异(rs=0.065,p=0.432),这证实了国内嗅觉测试与国外测试相比,对嗅觉能力的评估同样有效:在这项工作中,开发了一种使用俄罗斯嗅觉测试的方法,并在健康志愿者身上进行了验证。该测试的特点是评估嗅觉的阈值和识别能力、一套适合俄罗斯人的气味、在使用味道和描述符的视觉图像时使用吸墨纸。尽管心理物理测试种类繁多,但这一问题仍需要进一步研究,并对俄罗斯现有的嗅觉测试和国外类似测试进行比较分析,以便为我国居民获得一种通用、有效的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik otorinolaringologii
Vestnik otorinolaringologii Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信