Husband responses towards birth preparedness, complications readiness, and associated factors in southern Ethiopia: the case of Kena District.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Belda Negesa Beyene, Korra Gochano Hirra, Negeso Gebeyehu Gejo, Derese Eshetu Debela
{"title":"Husband responses towards birth preparedness, complications readiness, and associated factors in southern Ethiopia: the case of Kena District.","authors":"Belda Negesa Beyene, Korra Gochano Hirra, Negeso Gebeyehu Gejo, Derese Eshetu Debela","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01849-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Birth preparedness and complication readiness is a holistic approach that empowers mothers and families with the knowledge, attitude, and resources to alleviate potential challenges during childbirth. Despite its benefits, husbands' participation in maternal care differs significantly between countries and regions. There is a lack of previous studies that look at husbands' responses to birth preparedness and complication readiness in the research area. Thus, the primary goal of this study is to find out how husbands who have wives with infants under 12 months old feel about birth preparation, readiness for problems, and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from May 30 to July 29, 2022. Simple random sampling was employed to select 499 husbands. An interviewer-administered, structured, and pretested questionnaire was used to collect the data. Data entry and analysis were performed using Epi Data version 4.6 and SPSS version 25, respectively. We used multivariable logistic regression to find statistically significant factors. P-values less than 0.05, 95% confidence intervals, and adjusted odds ratios are used to declare statistical significance. The findings were shown in figures, tables, and text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that 55.9% (95% CI: 51.4 to 61.4%) of husbands responded to birth preparedness and complication readiness. This response was significantly associated with being employed (AOR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.27-5.95), engaging in self-business (AOR = 5.3, 95% CI: 2.34-12.01), having wives who delivered in health facilities (AOR = 7.1, 95% CI: 3.92-12.86), accompanying wives for antenatal care (AOR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.39-3.56), possessing good knowledge of danger signs during labor (AOR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.08-3.74) and the postnatal period (AOR = 7.1, 95% CI: 3.14-16.01). Interestingly, residents living near a health facility (AOR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.39-0.97) were less likely to respond.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study found that nearly 6 out of 10 husbands actively responded in terms of birth preparedness and complication readiness. While husbands in this study showed some involvement in birth preparedness and complications, it is good when compared to studies carried out nationally. To improve this, educating husbands by focusing on the danger signs and their role in childbirth is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01849-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Birth preparedness and complication readiness is a holistic approach that empowers mothers and families with the knowledge, attitude, and resources to alleviate potential challenges during childbirth. Despite its benefits, husbands' participation in maternal care differs significantly between countries and regions. There is a lack of previous studies that look at husbands' responses to birth preparedness and complication readiness in the research area. Thus, the primary goal of this study is to find out how husbands who have wives with infants under 12 months old feel about birth preparation, readiness for problems, and its associated factors.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from May 30 to July 29, 2022. Simple random sampling was employed to select 499 husbands. An interviewer-administered, structured, and pretested questionnaire was used to collect the data. Data entry and analysis were performed using Epi Data version 4.6 and SPSS version 25, respectively. We used multivariable logistic regression to find statistically significant factors. P-values less than 0.05, 95% confidence intervals, and adjusted odds ratios are used to declare statistical significance. The findings were shown in figures, tables, and text.

Results: The study found that 55.9% (95% CI: 51.4 to 61.4%) of husbands responded to birth preparedness and complication readiness. This response was significantly associated with being employed (AOR = 3.7, 95% CI: 2.27-5.95), engaging in self-business (AOR = 5.3, 95% CI: 2.34-12.01), having wives who delivered in health facilities (AOR = 7.1, 95% CI: 3.92-12.86), accompanying wives for antenatal care (AOR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.39-3.56), possessing good knowledge of danger signs during labor (AOR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.08-3.74) and the postnatal period (AOR = 7.1, 95% CI: 3.14-16.01). Interestingly, residents living near a health facility (AOR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.39-0.97) were less likely to respond.

Conclusion: The present study found that nearly 6 out of 10 husbands actively responded in terms of birth preparedness and complication readiness. While husbands in this study showed some involvement in birth preparedness and complications, it is good when compared to studies carried out nationally. To improve this, educating husbands by focusing on the danger signs and their role in childbirth is recommended.

埃塞俄比亚南部丈夫对分娩准备、并发症准备及相关因素的反应:Kena 地区的案例。
背景:分娩准备和并发症准备是一种综合方法,它赋予母亲和家庭知识、态度和资源,以减轻分娩过程中可能出现的挑战。尽管这种方法好处多多,但不同国家和地区的丈夫参与产妇护理的情况却大相径庭。在这一研究领域,以往缺乏对丈夫对分娩准备和并发症准备的反应的研究。因此,本研究的主要目的是了解妻子有 12 个月以下婴儿的丈夫对分娩准备、并发症准备及其相关因素的看法:方法:2022 年 5 月 30 日至 7 月 29 日进行了一项基于社区的横断面研究。研究采用简单随机抽样的方法选取了 499 名丈夫。采用由访谈者主持、结构化和预先测试的问卷来收集数据。数据录入和分析分别使用 Epi Data 4.6 版和 SPSS 25 版进行。我们使用多变量逻辑回归法来寻找具有统计学意义的因素。小于 0.05 的 P 值、95% 的置信区间和调整后的几率比值用于宣布统计意义。研究结果以图、表和文字形式显示:研究发现,55.9%(95% CI:51.4% 至 61.4%)的丈夫对分娩准备和并发症准备做出了回应。这种回答与以下因素有很大关系:有工作(AOR = 3.7,95% CI:2.27-5.95)、从事个体经营(AOR = 5.3,95% CI:2.34-12.01)、妻子在医疗机构分娩(AOR = 7.1,95% CI:3.92-12.86)、陪同妻子进行产前护理(AOR = 2.2,95% CI:1.39-3.56)、对分娩时的危险信号有良好的了解(AOR = 2.0,95% CI:1.08-3.74)以及产后护理(AOR = 7.1,95% CI:3.14-16.01)。有趣的是,居住在医疗机构附近的居民(AOR = 0.6,95% CI:0.39-0.97)较少做出回应:本研究发现,每 10 位丈夫中就有近 6 位积极响应分娩准备和并发症准备。虽然在本研究中,丈夫们在分娩准备和并发症方面表现出了一定的参与度,但与全国范围内开展的研究相比,这一参与度还算不错。为了改善这一状况,建议对丈夫进行教育,重点是危险信号及其在分娩中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信