Risto Uusitalo, Riitta Lemola, Mira Šuštar, Mika Kurkilahti, Janne Kaseva, Eila Turtola
{"title":"Strategic tillage of no-till decreased surface and subsurface losses of dissolved phosphorus","authors":"Risto Uusitalo, Riitta Lemola, Mira Šuštar, Mika Kurkilahti, Janne Kaseva, Eila Turtola","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Enrichment of soluble P on the surface layer of long-term no-till (NT) soils, and consequent increase in dissolved P losses, is a concern for which occasional plowing has been suggested as a remedy. We measured the effect of such strategic tillage (ST) on surface and subsurface P losses from 0.5-ha field plots on clay soil for 4 years. Two NT plots had discharged threefold dissolved molybdate-reactive P (DRP) losses compared to annually plowed soil conventional tillage (CT). ST by plowing to 20-cm depth was applied on one of the NT plots, whereas the other remained under NT. ST done in July was sown with canola (<i>Brassica napus</i> ssp. <i>oleifera</i>) to establish plant cover before winter. Summed 4-year DRP loss from ST treatment was 60% lower compared to NT (0.78 vs. 1.96 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), accompanied with 11% higher particulate P (PP) loss (4.39 vs. 3.97 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). CT plots produced slightly lower DRP losses (0.53–0.76 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than ST, but higher PP losses (6.02–7.96 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Bioavailable P (BAP) losses from ST were lower than from the other treatments if >7% of PP turns bioavailable. After ST, soil P stratification first vanished, but started to develop again when NT was resumed. Occasional tillage of NT soils mitigates DRP losses over several years, and it was at the study site the preferred mitigation option in reducing BAP losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":"53 5","pages":"657-668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20612","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enrichment of soluble P on the surface layer of long-term no-till (NT) soils, and consequent increase in dissolved P losses, is a concern for which occasional plowing has been suggested as a remedy. We measured the effect of such strategic tillage (ST) on surface and subsurface P losses from 0.5-ha field plots on clay soil for 4 years. Two NT plots had discharged threefold dissolved molybdate-reactive P (DRP) losses compared to annually plowed soil conventional tillage (CT). ST by plowing to 20-cm depth was applied on one of the NT plots, whereas the other remained under NT. ST done in July was sown with canola (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) to establish plant cover before winter. Summed 4-year DRP loss from ST treatment was 60% lower compared to NT (0.78 vs. 1.96 kg ha−1), accompanied with 11% higher particulate P (PP) loss (4.39 vs. 3.97 kg ha−1). CT plots produced slightly lower DRP losses (0.53–0.76 kg ha−1) than ST, but higher PP losses (6.02–7.96 kg ha−1). Bioavailable P (BAP) losses from ST were lower than from the other treatments if >7% of PP turns bioavailable. After ST, soil P stratification first vanished, but started to develop again when NT was resumed. Occasional tillage of NT soils mitigates DRP losses over several years, and it was at the study site the preferred mitigation option in reducing BAP losses.
期刊介绍:
Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring.
Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.