Apelin-13 administration allows for norepinephrine sparing in a rat model of cecal ligation and puncture-induced septic shock.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
William Salvail, Dany Salvail, Frédéric Chagnon, Olivier Lesur
{"title":"Apelin-13 administration allows for norepinephrine sparing in a rat model of cecal ligation and puncture-induced septic shock.","authors":"William Salvail, Dany Salvail, Frédéric Chagnon, Olivier Lesur","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00650-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infusion of exogenous catecholamines (i.e., norepinephrine [NE] and dobutamine) is a recommended treatment for septic shock with myocardial dysfunction. However, sustained catecholamine infusion is linked to cardiac toxicity and impaired responsiveness. Several pre-clinical and clinical studies have investigated the use of alternative vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock, with limited benefits and generally no effect on mortality. Apelin-13 (APL-13) is an endogenous positive inotrope and vasoactive peptide and has been demonstrated cardioprotective with vasomodulator and sparing life effects in animal models of septic shock. A primary objective of this study was to evaluate the NE-sparing effect of APL-13 infusion in an experimental sepsis-induced hypotension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this goal, sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats and the arterial blood pressure (BP) monitored continuously via a carotid catheter. Monitoring, fluid resuscitation and experimental treatments were performed on conscious animals. Based on pilot assays, normal saline fluid resuscitation (2.5 mL/Kg/h) was initiated 3 h post-CLP and maintained up to the endpoint. Thus, titrated doses of NE, with or without fixed-doses of APL-13 or the apelin receptor antagonist F13A co-infusion were started when 20% decrease of systolic BP (SBP) from baseline was achieved, to restore SBP values ≥ 115 ± 1.5 mmHg (baseline average ± SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A reduction in mean NE dose was observed with APL-13 but not F13A co-infusion at pre-determined treatment time of 4.5 ± 0.5 h (17.37 ± 1.74 µg/Kg/h [APL-13] vs. 25.64 ± 2.61 µg/Kg/h [Control NE] vs. 28.60 ± 4.79 µg/Kg/min [F13A], P = 0.0491). A 60% decrease in NE infusion rate over time was observed with APL-13 co-infusion, (p = 0.008 vs NE alone), while F13A co-infusion increased the NE infusion rate over time by 218% (p = 0.003 vs NE + APL-13). Associated improvements in cardiac function are likely mediated by (i) enhanced left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.18 ± 0.02 mL [Control NE] vs. 0.30 ± 0.03 mL [APL-13], P = 0.0051), stroke volume (0.11 ± 0.01 mL [Control NE] vs. 0.21 ± 0.01 mL [APL-13], P < 0.001) and cardiac output (67.57 ± 8.63 mL/min [Control NE] vs. 112.20 ± 8.53 mL/min [APL-13], P = 0.0036), and (ii) a reduced effective arterial elastance (920.6 ± 81.4 mmHg/mL/min [Control NE] vs. 497.633.44 mmHg/mL/min. [APL-13], P = 0.0002). APL-13 administration was also associated with a decrease in lactate levels compared to animals only receiving NE (7.08 ± 0.40 [Control NE] vs. 4.78 ± 0.60 [APL-13], P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>APL-13 exhibits NE-sparing benefits in the treatment of sepsis-induced shock, potentially reducing deleterious effects of prolonged exogenous catecholamine administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00650-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infusion of exogenous catecholamines (i.e., norepinephrine [NE] and dobutamine) is a recommended treatment for septic shock with myocardial dysfunction. However, sustained catecholamine infusion is linked to cardiac toxicity and impaired responsiveness. Several pre-clinical and clinical studies have investigated the use of alternative vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock, with limited benefits and generally no effect on mortality. Apelin-13 (APL-13) is an endogenous positive inotrope and vasoactive peptide and has been demonstrated cardioprotective with vasomodulator and sparing life effects in animal models of septic shock. A primary objective of this study was to evaluate the NE-sparing effect of APL-13 infusion in an experimental sepsis-induced hypotension.

Methods: For this goal, sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats and the arterial blood pressure (BP) monitored continuously via a carotid catheter. Monitoring, fluid resuscitation and experimental treatments were performed on conscious animals. Based on pilot assays, normal saline fluid resuscitation (2.5 mL/Kg/h) was initiated 3 h post-CLP and maintained up to the endpoint. Thus, titrated doses of NE, with or without fixed-doses of APL-13 or the apelin receptor antagonist F13A co-infusion were started when 20% decrease of systolic BP (SBP) from baseline was achieved, to restore SBP values ≥ 115 ± 1.5 mmHg (baseline average ± SEM).

Results: A reduction in mean NE dose was observed with APL-13 but not F13A co-infusion at pre-determined treatment time of 4.5 ± 0.5 h (17.37 ± 1.74 µg/Kg/h [APL-13] vs. 25.64 ± 2.61 µg/Kg/h [Control NE] vs. 28.60 ± 4.79 µg/Kg/min [F13A], P = 0.0491). A 60% decrease in NE infusion rate over time was observed with APL-13 co-infusion, (p = 0.008 vs NE alone), while F13A co-infusion increased the NE infusion rate over time by 218% (p = 0.003 vs NE + APL-13). Associated improvements in cardiac function are likely mediated by (i) enhanced left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.18 ± 0.02 mL [Control NE] vs. 0.30 ± 0.03 mL [APL-13], P = 0.0051), stroke volume (0.11 ± 0.01 mL [Control NE] vs. 0.21 ± 0.01 mL [APL-13], P < 0.001) and cardiac output (67.57 ± 8.63 mL/min [Control NE] vs. 112.20 ± 8.53 mL/min [APL-13], P = 0.0036), and (ii) a reduced effective arterial elastance (920.6 ± 81.4 mmHg/mL/min [Control NE] vs. 497.633.44 mmHg/mL/min. [APL-13], P = 0.0002). APL-13 administration was also associated with a decrease in lactate levels compared to animals only receiving NE (7.08 ± 0.40 [Control NE] vs. 4.78 ± 0.60 [APL-13], P < 0.01).

Conclusion: APL-13 exhibits NE-sparing benefits in the treatment of sepsis-induced shock, potentially reducing deleterious effects of prolonged exogenous catecholamine administration.

在盲肠结扎和穿刺诱发脓毒性休克的大鼠模型中,施用 Apelin-13 可节省去甲肾上腺素。
背景:输注外源性儿茶酚胺(即去甲肾上腺素 [NE] 和多巴酚丁胺)是治疗伴有心肌功能障碍的脓毒性休克的推荐方法。然而,持续输注儿茶酚胺与心脏毒性和反应能力受损有关。有几项临床前和临床研究对使用替代性血管加压剂治疗脓毒性休克进行了调查,结果显示其疗效有限,而且通常对死亡率没有影响。Apelin-13(APL-13)是一种内源性正性肌力素和血管活性肽,在脓毒性休克动物模型中已被证实具有保护心脏、调节血管和维持生命的作用。本研究的主要目的是评估输注 APL-13 对脓毒症诱发的实验性低血压的 NE 保护作用:为此,通过盲肠结扎和穿刺(CLP)诱导雄性大鼠发生脓毒症,并通过颈动脉导管持续监测动脉血压(BP)。监测、液体复苏和实验治疗均在清醒的动物身上进行。根据试验结果,CLP 后 3 小时开始使用生理盐水复苏(2.5 mL/Kg/h),并一直维持到终点。因此,当收缩压(SBP)比基线下降 20% 时,就开始滴定剂量的 NE,同时注射或不注射固定剂量的 APL-13 或 apelin 受体拮抗剂 F13A,以恢复 SBP 值≥ 115 ± 1.5 mmHg(基线平均值 ± SEM):在 4.5 ± 0.5 h 的预定治疗时间内,观察到 APL-13 而非 F13A 联合输注的 NE 平均剂量减少(17.37 ± 1.74 µg/Kg/h [APL-13] vs. 25.64 ± 2.61 µg/Kg/h [Control NE] vs. 28.60 ± 4.79 µg/Kg/min [F13A],P = 0.0491)。联合输注 APL-13 后,随着时间的推移,NE 输注率下降了 60%(P = 0.008 vs NE 单独),而联合输注 F13A 后,随着时间的推移,NE 输注率增加了 218%(P = 0.003 vs NE + APL-13)。APL-13 在治疗脓毒症引起的休克时具有节省 NE 的作用,可能会减少长期使用外源性儿茶酚胺的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信