Combination of a monofocal and one type of extended depth-of-focus (zonal refractive) intraocular lens (COMEDI) in bilateral cataract surgery protocol: a monocentric, randomised, parallel group trial in cataract surgery.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Karolien Termote, Roger Van Schoor, Iva Krolo, Silke Oellerich, Wilfried Cools, Heleen Delbeke, Sorcha Ni Dhubhghaill
{"title":"Combination of a monofocal and one type of extended depth-of-focus (zonal refractive) intraocular lens (COMEDI) in bilateral cataract surgery protocol: a monocentric, randomised, parallel group trial in cataract surgery.","authors":"Karolien Termote, Roger Van Schoor, Iva Krolo, Silke Oellerich, Wilfried Cools, Heleen Delbeke, Sorcha Ni Dhubhghaill","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Modern intraocular lens (IOL) designs for cataract treatment can be broadly classified into three focal range categories; monofocal, extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and multifocal IOLs.Monofocal IOLs allow spectacle independence for one focus, typically distance. In contrast, EDOF IOLs provide a greater range of vision, extending spectacle independence to intermediate distance, while multifocal IOLs enable spectacle independence at all distances with the drawback of positive dysphotopsias and reduced contrast perception.EDOF lenses are an attractive compromise with fewer dysphotopic side effects than multifocals. The purpose of this study is to assess whether implanting an EDOF IOL in the second eye of a patient who received a monofocal IOL in the first eye can improve spectacle independence while maintaining the same optical quality as bilateral monofocal IOL implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This study compares combined monofocal and EDOF IOL implantation versus bilateral monofocal IOL implantation in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a monocentric, randomised, patient-masked and assessor-masked, parallel group trial in 88 bilateral cataract patients. The primary outcome measure is binocular photopic distance corrected intermediate visual acuity. The secondary outcome measures include (un)corrected distance and near visual acuity, reading speed at intermediate distance, quality of visual function assessments, patient-reported spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity, aberrometry, stereopsis and straylight measurement at the 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospital of Brussels (BUN 23219_EDOF).</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06002399.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Modern intraocular lens (IOL) designs for cataract treatment can be broadly classified into three focal range categories; monofocal, extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and multifocal IOLs.Monofocal IOLs allow spectacle independence for one focus, typically distance. In contrast, EDOF IOLs provide a greater range of vision, extending spectacle independence to intermediate distance, while multifocal IOLs enable spectacle independence at all distances with the drawback of positive dysphotopsias and reduced contrast perception.EDOF lenses are an attractive compromise with fewer dysphotopic side effects than multifocals. The purpose of this study is to assess whether implanting an EDOF IOL in the second eye of a patient who received a monofocal IOL in the first eye can improve spectacle independence while maintaining the same optical quality as bilateral monofocal IOL implantation.

Methods and analysis: This study compares combined monofocal and EDOF IOL implantation versus bilateral monofocal IOL implantation in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a monocentric, randomised, patient-masked and assessor-masked, parallel group trial in 88 bilateral cataract patients. The primary outcome measure is binocular photopic distance corrected intermediate visual acuity. The secondary outcome measures include (un)corrected distance and near visual acuity, reading speed at intermediate distance, quality of visual function assessments, patient-reported spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity, aberrometry, stereopsis and straylight measurement at the 3-month follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospital of Brussels (BUN 23219_EDOF).

Trial registration number: NCT06002399.

在双侧白内障手术方案中结合使用单焦点和一种扩展焦深(带状屈光)眼内透镜 (COMEDI):白内障手术中的单中心、随机、平行组试验。
导言:用于白内障治疗的现代眼内人工晶体(IOL)设计可大致分为三种焦点范围类别:单焦点、扩展焦深(EDOF)和多焦点人工晶体。相比之下,EDOF 人工晶体可提供更大的视力范围,将眼镜的独立性延伸至中距离,而多焦点人工晶体则可在所有距离上实现眼镜的独立性,但其缺点是存在正性视力障碍和对比度感知降低。EDOF 镜片是一种有吸引力的折衷方案,其视力障碍副作用比多焦点镜片少。本研究的目的是评估在第一只眼睛接受单焦点人工晶体植入术的患者的第二只眼睛植入 EDOF 人工晶体是否可以提高眼镜的独立性,同时保持与双侧单焦点人工晶体植入术相同的光学质量:本研究比较了单焦点和EDOF联合人工晶体植入术与双侧单焦点人工晶体植入术在临床和患者报告结果方面的差异,对88名双侧白内障患者进行了单中心、随机、患者掩蔽和评估者掩蔽的平行分组试验。主要结果指标是双眼光远校正中间视力。次要结果指标包括(未)矫正的远视力和近视力、中距离阅读速度、视觉功能质量评估、患者报告的眼镜独立性、对比敏感度、像差测量、立体视和 3 个月随访时的杂散光测量:该方案已获得布鲁塞尔大学医院伦理委员会批准(BUN 23219_EDOF):试验注册号:NCT06002399。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信