Pre-implementation planning for a new personalised, dementia post-diagnostic support intervention: exploring the perspective of professional stakeholders.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.733
Ayesha Dar, Jessica Budgett, Sedigheh Zabihi, Ellenyd Whitfield, Iain Lang, Penny Rapaport, Bronte Heath, Margaret Ogden, Rosemary Phillips, Alexandra Burton, Laurie Butler, Danielle Wyman, Juanita Hoe, Jill Manthorpe, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, Freya Koutsoubelis, Claudia Cooper
{"title":"Pre-implementation planning for a new personalised, dementia post-diagnostic support intervention: exploring the perspective of professional stakeholders.","authors":"Ayesha Dar, Jessica Budgett, Sedigheh Zabihi, Ellenyd Whitfield, Iain Lang, Penny Rapaport, Bronte Heath, Margaret Ogden, Rosemary Phillips, Alexandra Burton, Laurie Butler, Danielle Wyman, Juanita Hoe, Jill Manthorpe, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, Freya Koutsoubelis, Claudia Cooper","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only a third of people with dementia receive a diagnosis and post-diagnostic support. An eight session, manualised, modular post-diagnostic support system (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) - family), delivered remotely by non-clinical facilitators is the first scalable intervention to improve personalised goal attainment for people with dementia. It could significantly improve care quality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to explore system readiness for NIDUS-family, a scalable, personalised post-diagnostic support intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with professionals from dementia care services; the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided interviews and their thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2022 to 2023, we interviewed a purposive sample of 21 professionals from seven English National Health Service, health and social care services. We identified three themes: (1) potential value of a personalised intervention - interviewees perceived the capacity for choice and supporting person-centred care as relative advantages over existing resources; (2) compatibility and deliverability with existing systems - the NIDUS-family intervention model was perceived as compatible with service goals and clients' needs, but current service infrastructures, financing and commissioning briefs constraining resources to those at greatest need were seen as barriers to providing universal, post-diagnostic care; (3) fit with current workforce skills - the intervention model aligned well with staff development plans; delivery by non-clinically qualified staff was considered an advantage over current care options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Translating evidence for scalable and effective post-diagnostic care into practice will support national policies to widen access to support and upskill support workers, but requires a greater focus on prevention in commissioning briefs and resource planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Only a third of people with dementia receive a diagnosis and post-diagnostic support. An eight session, manualised, modular post-diagnostic support system (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) - family), delivered remotely by non-clinical facilitators is the first scalable intervention to improve personalised goal attainment for people with dementia. It could significantly improve care quality.

Aims: We aimed to explore system readiness for NIDUS-family, a scalable, personalised post-diagnostic support intervention.

Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with professionals from dementia care services; the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided interviews and their thematic analysis.

Results: From 2022 to 2023, we interviewed a purposive sample of 21 professionals from seven English National Health Service, health and social care services. We identified three themes: (1) potential value of a personalised intervention - interviewees perceived the capacity for choice and supporting person-centred care as relative advantages over existing resources; (2) compatibility and deliverability with existing systems - the NIDUS-family intervention model was perceived as compatible with service goals and clients' needs, but current service infrastructures, financing and commissioning briefs constraining resources to those at greatest need were seen as barriers to providing universal, post-diagnostic care; (3) fit with current workforce skills - the intervention model aligned well with staff development plans; delivery by non-clinically qualified staff was considered an advantage over current care options.

Conclusions: Translating evidence for scalable and effective post-diagnostic care into practice will support national policies to widen access to support and upskill support workers, but requires a greater focus on prevention in commissioning briefs and resource planning.

新型个性化痴呆症诊断后支持干预的实施前规划:探讨专业利益相关者的观点。
背景:只有三分之一的痴呆症患者得到了诊断和诊断后支持。由非临床辅助人员远程提供的八节课、手册化、模块化的诊断后支持系统(痴呆症独立新干预研究(NIDUS)-家庭)是首个可扩展的干预措施,可改善痴呆症患者个性化目标的实现。目的:我们旨在探索NIDUS-family的系统准备情况,这是一种可扩展的个性化诊断后支持干预措施:我们对痴呆症护理服务机构的专业人士进行了半结构化访谈;实施研究综合框架为访谈及其主题分析提供了指导:从 2022 年到 2023 年,我们有目的性地采访了 21 位专业人士,他们来自 7 个英国国民健康服务机构、医疗和社会护理服务机构。我们确定了三个主题:(1) 个性化干预的潜在价值--受访者认为,与现有资源相比,个性化干预具有选择能力和支持以人为本的护理的相对优势;(2) 与现有系统的兼容性和可实施性--受访者认为,NIDUS-家庭干预模式与服务目标和客户需求相匹配,但目前的服务基础设施、融资和委托简介限制了将资源用于最需要的人,这被视为提供普遍的诊断后护理的障碍;(3) 与当前劳动力技能的契合度--干预模式与员工发展计划非常吻合;与当前的护理方案相比,由非临床资格的员工提供服务被认为是一种优势。结论:将可扩展且有效的诊断后护理的证据转化为实践将支持国家政策,以扩大获得支持的途径并提高支持人员的技能,但需要在委托简介和资源规划中更加注重预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信