Identifying Patients at Risk for Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancies: The Importance of Addressing Multiple Risk Factors.

Bonnie G McRee, Bridget L Hanson, Janice Vendetti, Diane K King, Iwona Pawlukiewicz, Erin Berry, Jessica Johnson, Deanna Marshall, Lauren Rosato, Karen Steinberg Gallucci, Corrie Whitmore
{"title":"Identifying Patients at Risk for Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancies: The Importance of Addressing Multiple Risk Factors.","authors":"Bonnie G McRee, Bridget L Hanson, Janice Vendetti, Diane K King, Iwona Pawlukiewicz, Erin Berry, Jessica Johnson, Deanna Marshall, Lauren Rosato, Karen Steinberg Gallucci, Corrie Whitmore","doi":"10.1177/29767342241267086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders is a critical public health issue. Two behaviors, consuming alcohol and using less effective pregnancy prevention, may result in alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) in individuals who can become pregnant. In the context of alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) services, cutoff scores on widely used alcohol risk assessments (eg, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, U.S. version [USAUDIT]) may fail to identify individuals whose relatively low alcohol consumption may still put them at risk for an AEP due to their pregnancy prevention method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify this gap in alcohol SBI service delivery, we examined data from 2 reproductive healthcare systems implementing alcohol SBI, to explore the prevalence of individuals who met both of the following risk conditions: reported any alcohol use on the USAUDIT and a pregnancy prevention method less than 88% effective. Electronic health records for individuals aged 18 to 49 presenting for preventive care in 2021 were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11 567 screened, 7638 reported some alcohol use, but screened at a lower-risk level and were not flagged to receive an alcohol-focused brief intervention (BI). Of these, 1477 were using a method of pregnancy prevention that was less than 88% effective. In addition, 118 of the 1676 who screened positive on the USAUDIT were using less effective contraception and did not receive a BI. In summary, the number of individuals at risk of an AEP who did not receive an alcohol BI was 1595 (13.8%) of the total patients screened for at-risk alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a need for system modifications to assess multiple behaviors simultaneously and alert providers when a combination of behaviors increases a specific health risk, such as an AEP. Tailored alcohol BIs that include the risks/benefits of various pregnancy prevention methods to reduce AEPs provide opportunities to enhance the reach of standard alcohol SBI services.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241267086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders is a critical public health issue. Two behaviors, consuming alcohol and using less effective pregnancy prevention, may result in alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) in individuals who can become pregnant. In the context of alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) services, cutoff scores on widely used alcohol risk assessments (eg, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, U.S. version [USAUDIT]) may fail to identify individuals whose relatively low alcohol consumption may still put them at risk for an AEP due to their pregnancy prevention method.

Methods: To identify this gap in alcohol SBI service delivery, we examined data from 2 reproductive healthcare systems implementing alcohol SBI, to explore the prevalence of individuals who met both of the following risk conditions: reported any alcohol use on the USAUDIT and a pregnancy prevention method less than 88% effective. Electronic health records for individuals aged 18 to 49 presenting for preventive care in 2021 were analyzed.

Results: Of 11 567 screened, 7638 reported some alcohol use, but screened at a lower-risk level and were not flagged to receive an alcohol-focused brief intervention (BI). Of these, 1477 were using a method of pregnancy prevention that was less than 88% effective. In addition, 118 of the 1676 who screened positive on the USAUDIT were using less effective contraception and did not receive a BI. In summary, the number of individuals at risk of an AEP who did not receive an alcohol BI was 1595 (13.8%) of the total patients screened for at-risk alcohol use.

Conclusions: There is a need for system modifications to assess multiple behaviors simultaneously and alert providers when a combination of behaviors increases a specific health risk, such as an AEP. Tailored alcohol BIs that include the risks/benefits of various pregnancy prevention methods to reduce AEPs provide opportunities to enhance the reach of standard alcohol SBI services.

识别有酒精暴露怀孕风险的患者:应对多重风险因素的重要性。
背景:胎儿酒精谱系障碍发病率的不断上升是一个重要的公共卫生问题。饮酒和采取不那么有效的避孕措施这两种行为可能会导致可能怀孕的人酒精暴露怀孕(AEPs)。在酒精筛查和简短干预(SBI)服务中,广泛使用的酒精风险评估(如美国版酒精使用障碍鉴定测试[USAUDIT])的临界分数可能无法识别出酒精消耗量相对较低的人,而这些人的避孕方法仍可能使他们面临酒精暴露怀孕的风险:为了确定酒精 SBI 服务提供中的这一缺陷,我们检查了来自 2 个实施酒精 SBI 的生殖医疗系统的数据,以探究同时满足以下风险条件的人群的患病率:在 USAUDIT 中报告有任何饮酒行为,且避孕方法的有效率低于 88%。研究分析了 2021 年接受预防保健的 18 至 49 岁人群的电子健康记录:在接受筛查的 11 567 人中,有 7 638 人报告有一些饮酒行为,但筛查出的风险水平较低,没有被标记为接受以酒精为重点的简短干预 (BI)。其中,1477 人使用的避孕方法有效率低于 88%。此外,在 USAUDIT 筛选呈阳性的 1676 人中,有 118 人使用了效果较差的避孕措施,没有接受 BI。总之,在所有被筛查出有酗酒风险的患者中,有 1595 人(13.8%)有酗酒风险但未接受酒精 BI:有必要对系统进行修改,以同时评估多种行为,并在行为组合增加特定健康风险(如 AEP)时提醒医疗服务提供者。量身定制的酒精 BI 包括各种怀孕预防方法的风险/益处,以减少 AEP,这为提高标准酒精 SBI 服务的覆盖范围提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信