Effects of inadequate hospital clinical handover on metropolitan general practitioners in Queensland: A qualitative study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kate Johnston, Joan Cassimatis, Laetitia Hattingh
{"title":"Effects of inadequate hospital clinical handover on metropolitan general practitioners in Queensland: A qualitative study.","authors":"Kate Johnston, Joan Cassimatis, Laetitia Hattingh","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-03-23-6783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Transition from hospital to community care is well established as a high-risk time for patients. Inadequate clinical handover to general practice puts patients at risk of medical error, adverse events and rehospitalisation. We sought to understand the effects on general practitioners (GPs) of poor clinical handover from the inpatient, outpatient and emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative methodology was used through conducting semi-structured interviews with purposively selected GPs. Interviews were undertaken until data reached saturation and no new themes emerged. The interviews were thematically analysed and coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key themes emerging included poor communication leading to patient safety concerns, time taken away from patient care and GPs experiencing a lack of professional respect.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinical handover from the hospital sector remains a source of frustration for GPs. Poor handover demonstrates a lack of appreciation for the important role of the GP in continuing the care of patients and puts patients at risk of poor outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-03-23-6783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Transition from hospital to community care is well established as a high-risk time for patients. Inadequate clinical handover to general practice puts patients at risk of medical error, adverse events and rehospitalisation. We sought to understand the effects on general practitioners (GPs) of poor clinical handover from the inpatient, outpatient and emergency department settings.

Method: Qualitative methodology was used through conducting semi-structured interviews with purposively selected GPs. Interviews were undertaken until data reached saturation and no new themes emerged. The interviews were thematically analysed and coded.

Results: Key themes emerging included poor communication leading to patient safety concerns, time taken away from patient care and GPs experiencing a lack of professional respect.

Discussion: Clinical handover from the hospital sector remains a source of frustration for GPs. Poor handover demonstrates a lack of appreciation for the important role of the GP in continuing the care of patients and puts patients at risk of poor outcomes.

医院临床交接不足对昆士兰州大都市全科医生的影响:定性研究。
背景和目的:从医院过渡到社区护理是病人的高风险时期,这一点已得到公认。与全科医生的临床交接不足会使患者面临医疗失误、不良事件和再次住院的风险。我们试图了解住院病人、门诊病人和急诊科之间临床交接不畅对全科医生(GPs)的影响:方法:采用定性方法,对有目的性地挑选出的全科医生进行半结构化访谈。访谈一直持续到数据达到饱和且不再出现新主题为止。对访谈进行主题分析和编码:结果:出现的关键主题包括沟通不畅导致患者安全问题、占用患者护理时间以及全科医生缺乏职业尊重:讨论:医院部门的临床交接仍然是全科医生感到沮丧的原因之一。不良的交接表明,全科医生在继续护理病人方面的重要作用未得到重视,并使病人面临不良后果的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信