Impact of Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program for Optimizing Antibiotic Treatment in Gram-negative Bacilli Bacteremia.

IF 2.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.3947/ic.2024.0026
Carles García-Cervera, Francisco Mariano Jover-Díaz, Elisabet Delgado-Sánchez, Coral Martin-González, Rosa Provencio-Arranz, Ana Infante-Urrios, Cristina Dólera-Moreno, Pedro Esteve-Atiénzar, Teresa Martínez Lazcano, Jorge Peris-García, Vicente Giner-Galvañ, Victoria Ortiz de la Tabla Ducasse, Ángel Sánchez-Miralles, Teresa Aznar-Saliente
{"title":"Impact of Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program for Optimizing Antibiotic Treatment in Gram-negative Bacilli Bacteremia.","authors":"Carles García-Cervera, Francisco Mariano Jover-Díaz, Elisabet Delgado-Sánchez, Coral Martin-González, Rosa Provencio-Arranz, Ana Infante-Urrios, Cristina Dólera-Moreno, Pedro Esteve-Atiénzar, Teresa Martínez Lazcano, Jorge Peris-García, Vicente Giner-Galvañ, Victoria Ortiz de la Tabla Ducasse, Ángel Sánchez-Miralles, Teresa Aznar-Saliente","doi":"10.3947/ic.2024.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASP) have improved empirical and directed antibiotic treatment in Gram-negative Bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections. A decrease in mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization has been reported.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A pre-post-quasi-experimental study was conducted between November and April 2015-2016 (pre-intervention period), 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 (post-intervention periods), to analyse the impact of ASP on empirical, directed, and entire treatment optimization, as well as mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization, in hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred seventy-four patients were included (41 in the pre-intervention group, 38 in the first-year post-intervention group, 50 in the second-year post-intervention group, and 45 in the third-year post-intervention group). There was a significant improvement in directed treatment optimization (43.9% in the pre-intervention group, 68.4% in the first-year post-intervention group, 74% in the second-year post-intervention group, and 88.9% in the third-year post-intervention group, <i>P</i> <0.001), as well as in entire treatment optimization (19.5%, 34.2%, 40.0%, and 46.7%, respectively, <i>P</i>=0.013), with increased optimal directed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-8.58) and entire treatment (aOR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.27-8.58). Although a tendency toward improvement was observed in empirical treatment after ASP implementation, it did not reach statistical significance (41.5% <i>vs.</i> 57.9%, <i>P</i>=0.065). No changes in mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASP implementation improved both directed and entire treatment optimization in patients with GNB bloodstream infections over time. Nevertheless, no improvement was found in clinical outcomes such as mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51616,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"351-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2024.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASP) have improved empirical and directed antibiotic treatment in Gram-negative Bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections. A decrease in mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization has been reported.

Materials and methods: A pre-post-quasi-experimental study was conducted between November and April 2015-2016 (pre-intervention period), 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 (post-intervention periods), to analyse the impact of ASP on empirical, directed, and entire treatment optimization, as well as mortality, readmission, and length of hospitalization, in hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections.

Results: One hundred seventy-four patients were included (41 in the pre-intervention group, 38 in the first-year post-intervention group, 50 in the second-year post-intervention group, and 45 in the third-year post-intervention group). There was a significant improvement in directed treatment optimization (43.9% in the pre-intervention group, 68.4% in the first-year post-intervention group, 74% in the second-year post-intervention group, and 88.9% in the third-year post-intervention group, P <0.001), as well as in entire treatment optimization (19.5%, 34.2%, 40.0%, and 46.7%, respectively, P=0.013), with increased optimal directed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-8.58) and entire treatment (aOR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.27-8.58). Although a tendency toward improvement was observed in empirical treatment after ASP implementation, it did not reach statistical significance (41.5% vs. 57.9%, P=0.065). No changes in mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization were detected.

Conclusion: ASP implementation improved both directed and entire treatment optimization in patients with GNB bloodstream infections over time. Nevertheless, no improvement was found in clinical outcomes such as mortality, readmission, or length of hospitalization.

实施抗菌药物管理计划对优化革兰氏阴性杆菌菌血症抗生素治疗的影响
背景:抗生素管理计划(ASP)改善了革兰氏阴性血流感染的经验性和指导性抗生素治疗。据报道,死亡率、再入院率和住院时间均有所下降:在 2015-2016 年 11 月至 4 月(干预前)、2016-2017 年、2017-2018 年和 2018-2019 年(干预后)期间开展了一项前-后-准实验研究,分析 ASP 对住院革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)血流感染患者经验性、指导性和全程治疗优化以及死亡率、再入院率和住院时间的影响:共纳入 174 名患者(干预前 41 人,干预后第一年 38 人,干预后第二年 50 人,干预后第三年 45 人)。定向治疗优化有了明显改善(干预前组 43.9%,干预后第一年组 68.4%,干预后第二年组 74%,干预后第三年组 88.9%,P P=0.013),最佳定向治疗(调整赔率 [aOR],3.71;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.60-8.58)和全程治疗(aOR,3.31;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.27-8.58)均有提高。虽然在实施 ASP 后,经验性治疗有改善趋势,但未达到统计学意义(41.5% 对 57.9%,P=0.065)。死亡率、再入院率和住院时间均未发生变化:结论:随着时间的推移,ASP 的实施改善了 GNB 血流感染患者的定向治疗和整体治疗优化。结论:随着时间的推移,ASP 的实施改善了 GNB 血流感染患者的定向和整体治疗优化,但在死亡率、再入院率或住院时间等临床结果方面未发现任何改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection and Chemotherapy
Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
11.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信