Does authentic assessment undermine authentic learning?

IF 3 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10361-z

Rose Hatala, Rachel H. Ellaway

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this editorial the editors consider the ideals and realities of high and low stakes assessments in clinical workplaces, the impact of these assessments on clinical workplace learning, and the clash between authenticity in assessment and authenticity in learning.

查看原文本刊更多论文

真实的评估会破坏真实的学习吗？

在这篇社论中，编辑们探讨了临床工作场所高风险和低风险评估的理想与现实，这些评估对临床工作场所学习的影响，以及评估的真实性与学习的真实性之间的冲突。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Health Sciences Education 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.