Development of an early intervention in psychosis services fidelity questionnaire.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Miriam Kinkaid, Rebecca Fuhrer, Stephen McGowan, Ashok Malla
{"title":"Development of an early intervention in psychosis services fidelity questionnaire.","authors":"Miriam Kinkaid, Rebecca Fuhrer, Stephen McGowan, Ashok Malla","doi":"10.1007/s00127-024-02711-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We describe the development of an online fidelity questionnaire for early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services, to be used in population-level research, and that can be completed using self-reports from EIP staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of key literature sources on the components of EIP services was used to identify those components eligible for inclusion in the questionnaire. A modified Delphi approach, using experts in EIP services, was used to select the most important components to include in the questionnaire. To pilot test the questionnaire, two EIP staff members completed one fidelity questionnaire each, and a third questionnaire was completed by an external rater. Responses from the three sources were compared and used to revise the fidelity questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two experts from England and Canada responded to two Delphi rounds, identifying the top 25 most important EIP service components. Some evidence-based components were not rated as highly as some non-evidence-based components. Pilot testing showed that the EIP staff rated fidelity higher than the external rater. Several questions were removed and/or revised based on the pilot study findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fidelity instruments are limited by the available evidence and the personal experiences of experts used to develop them. As such, fidelity instruments and EIP services should continually be updated to reflect new knowledge. The online fidelity questionnaire was a simple and efficient way to collect data. Future evaluations of the fidelity questionnaire need to ensure that externally collected fidelity data are comprehensive and accurate.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02711-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We describe the development of an online fidelity questionnaire for early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services, to be used in population-level research, and that can be completed using self-reports from EIP staff.

Methods: A review of key literature sources on the components of EIP services was used to identify those components eligible for inclusion in the questionnaire. A modified Delphi approach, using experts in EIP services, was used to select the most important components to include in the questionnaire. To pilot test the questionnaire, two EIP staff members completed one fidelity questionnaire each, and a third questionnaire was completed by an external rater. Responses from the three sources were compared and used to revise the fidelity questionnaire.

Results: Twenty-two experts from England and Canada responded to two Delphi rounds, identifying the top 25 most important EIP service components. Some evidence-based components were not rated as highly as some non-evidence-based components. Pilot testing showed that the EIP staff rated fidelity higher than the external rater. Several questions were removed and/or revised based on the pilot study findings.

Conclusions: Fidelity instruments are limited by the available evidence and the personal experiences of experts used to develop them. As such, fidelity instruments and EIP services should continually be updated to reflect new knowledge. The online fidelity questionnaire was a simple and efficient way to collect data. Future evaluations of the fidelity questionnaire need to ensure that externally collected fidelity data are comprehensive and accurate.

Abstract Image

编制精神病早期干预服务忠诚度问卷。
目的:我们介绍了精神病早期干预(EIP)服务忠实度在线调查问卷的开发情况,该问卷将用于人群层面的研究,并可通过 EIP 工作人员的自我报告来完成:方法:对有关 EIP 服务内容的主要文献资料进行了审查,以确定哪些内容符合纳入问卷的条件。利用 EIP 服务方面的专家,采用修改后的德尔菲法,选择最重要的内容纳入问卷。为了对问卷进行试点测试,两名 EIP 工作人员各完成了一份忠实度问卷,第三份问卷由一名外部评定者完成。对三个来源的答复进行比较,并用于修订忠实度问卷:来自英国和加拿大的 22 位专家对两轮德尔菲法做出了回应,确定了最重要的 25 项 EIP 服务内容。一些以证据为基础的内容没有像一些非证据内容那样得到高度评价。试点测试表明,EIP 工作人员对忠实度的评分高于外部评分者。根据试点研究结果,删除和/或修订了几个问题:保真度工具受制于现有证据和用于开发这些工具的专家的个人经验。因此,忠实度工具和 EIP 服务应不断更新,以反映新的知识。在线保真度问卷是一种简单有效的数据收集方式。今后对保真度问卷的评估需要确保外部收集的保真度数据是全面和准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信