Efficacy and safety of simultaneous combined Zephyr and Spiration valve therapy in patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
A. Susanne Dittrich , Konstantina Kontogianni , Ann-Sophie Unterschemmann , Susanne De Rossi , Franziska Trudzinski , Judith Maria Brock , Daniela Gompelmann , Claus Peter Heussel , Felix J.F. Herth , Ralf Eberhardt
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of simultaneous combined Zephyr and Spiration valve therapy in patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema","authors":"A. Susanne Dittrich ,&nbsp;Konstantina Kontogianni ,&nbsp;Ann-Sophie Unterschemmann ,&nbsp;Susanne De Rossi ,&nbsp;Franziska Trudzinski ,&nbsp;Judith Maria Brock ,&nbsp;Daniela Gompelmann ,&nbsp;Claus Peter Heussel ,&nbsp;Felix J.F. Herth ,&nbsp;Ralf Eberhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves is a minimally invasive treatment strategy for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. Two valve systems are currently available: Zephyr and Spiration valves. As these can be implanted simultaneously in the same procedure, the question arose as to the effect on lung function, exercise capacity and subjective disease perception after combined valve treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients with combined, simultaneous treatment of Zephyr and Spiration valves. The decision on which and how many valves to implant was based on the individual patient anatomy. Effects on lung function, exercise capacity and atelectasis formation as well as complications were evaluated 90- and 180-days post-treatment (90d-FU and 180d-FU).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 90d-FU (n = 90), the mean change was 86.7 ± 183.7 mL for FEV<sub>1</sub> and -645.3 ± 1276.5 mL for RV, with responder rates of 39.8 % and 46.5 %, respectively. Complete atelectasis occurred in 16.7 % and partial atelectasis in 25.5 % of patients. Six-minute walking distance increased by 27.00 m [-1.50 – 68.50m]. The rates of pneumothorax (10.2 %) 6 months after treatment were not higher than in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Likely due to the inclusion of high-risk patients, there was a higher incidence of severe COPD exacerbation (21.3 %) and pneumonia (12.0 %) compared to RCTs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combined implantation of Zephyr and Spiration valves resulted in significant clinical and functional improvements with an acceptable risk profile. Therefore, the ability to combine both valve types in severe emphysema could be a promising option in endoscopic lung volume reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095461112400235X/pdfft?md5=d6966f2d4a6cb8fafa59ab6982859fff&pid=1-s2.0-S095461112400235X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095461112400235X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves is a minimally invasive treatment strategy for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. Two valve systems are currently available: Zephyr and Spiration valves. As these can be implanted simultaneously in the same procedure, the question arose as to the effect on lung function, exercise capacity and subjective disease perception after combined valve treatment.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients with combined, simultaneous treatment of Zephyr and Spiration valves. The decision on which and how many valves to implant was based on the individual patient anatomy. Effects on lung function, exercise capacity and atelectasis formation as well as complications were evaluated 90- and 180-days post-treatment (90d-FU and 180d-FU).

Results

At 90d-FU (n = 90), the mean change was 86.7 ± 183.7 mL for FEV1 and -645.3 ± 1276.5 mL for RV, with responder rates of 39.8 % and 46.5 %, respectively. Complete atelectasis occurred in 16.7 % and partial atelectasis in 25.5 % of patients. Six-minute walking distance increased by 27.00 m [-1.50 – 68.50m]. The rates of pneumothorax (10.2 %) 6 months after treatment were not higher than in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Likely due to the inclusion of high-risk patients, there was a higher incidence of severe COPD exacerbation (21.3 %) and pneumonia (12.0 %) compared to RCTs.

Conclusions

The combined implantation of Zephyr and Spiration valves resulted in significant clinical and functional improvements with an acceptable risk profile. Therefore, the ability to combine both valve types in severe emphysema could be a promising option in endoscopic lung volume reduction.

对晚期肺气肿患者同时采用 Zephyr 和 Spiration 瓣膜联合疗法的有效性和安全性。
背景:内窥镜肺活量瓣膜减容术是一种针对严重肺气肿患者的微创治疗策略。目前有两种瓣膜系统可供选择:Zephyr 瓣膜和 Spiration 瓣膜。由于这两种瓣膜可在同一手术中同时植入,因此出现了一个问题,即联合瓣膜治疗后对肺功能、运动能力和主观疾病感觉的影响:我们对 108 名同时接受 Zephyr 和 Spiration 瓣膜联合治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。植入哪个瓣膜以及植入几个瓣膜的决定是基于患者的个体解剖结构。对治疗后 90 天和 180 天(90d-FU 和 180d-FU)肺功能、运动能力和肺不张形成以及并发症的影响进行了评估:90d-FU时(n=90),FEV1的平均变化为86.7±183.7毫升,RV的平均变化为-645.3±1276.5毫升,应答率分别为39.8%和46.5%。16.7%的患者出现完全性肺不张,25.5%的患者出现部分肺不张。六分钟步行距离增加了 27.00 米 [-1.50 - 68.50 米]。治疗6个月后的气胸发生率(10.2%)并未高于随机对照试验(RCT)。可能是由于纳入了高危患者,与随机对照试验相比,严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重(21.3%)和肺炎(12.0%)的发生率更高:结论:联合植入 Zephyr 和 Spiration 瓣膜可显著改善临床和功能,且风险可接受。因此,在重度肺气肿患者中联合使用这两种瓣膜可能是内镜肺容积缩小术中的一种很有前景的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信