Efficacy and Safety of Anti-VEGF Injections and Surgery for Age-Related Macular Degeneration-Related Submacular Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Topic: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF injections compared with surgical intervention in improving visual acuity (VA) and reducing complications for patients with submacular hemorrhage (SMH) due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Clinical relevance: Determining the optimal intervention for SMH in AMD is crucial for patient care.

Methods: We included studies on anti-VEGF injections or surgical interventions for SMH in AMD from 7 databases, searched up to May 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were done by 2 independent reviewers. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis employed random-effects models. Primary outcomes were pooled mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA difference (initial examination minus last follow-up VA) and adverse events rates.

Results: A total of 43 observational studies were included: 21 (960 eyes) on anti-VEGF and 22 (455 eyes) on surgery. Comparisons were made across separate studies due to lack of head-to-head studies. Meta-analysis included 11 anti-VEGF studies (444 eyes) and 12 surgical studies (195 eyes) for VA outcomes. The mean difference in VA was -0.16 (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.24 to -0.08) for anti-VEGF and -0.36 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.04) for surgery, with no significant difference between groups (chi-square = 1.70, df = 1, P = 0.19). Heterogeneity was high in surgical studies (I² = 96.2%, τ² = 0.23, P < 0.01) and negligible in anti-VEGF studies (I² = 7%, τ² = 0.003, P = 0.38). The GRADE certainty was moderate for anti-VEGF and low for surgery. Anti-VEGF had lower rates of cataract (0% vs. 4.6%), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (0.1% vs. 2.0%), and retinal detachment (0.1% vs. 10.6%), but similar rates of recurrent hemorrhage (5.4% vs. 5.3%). Complications were summarized descriptively due to zero-cell problem.

Conclusion: Both anti-VEGF and surgery treat SMH in AMD with similar VA outcomes but different safety profiles. Anti-VEGF is preferred for less severe hemorrhage, whereas surgery is suited for extensive hemorrhage. Despite uncertain comparative VA outcomes, treatment should be guided by clinical judgment and patient factors.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.