A comparative study on the effects of fungal and bacterial phytase with or without citric acid on growth performance, serum mineral profile, bone quality, and nutrient retention in broilers.

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research Pub Date : 2024-06-09 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.5455/javar.2024.k786
Rakhi Chowdhury, Md Aliar Rahman, Khan Md Shaiful Islam, Mohammad Al-Mamun
{"title":"A comparative study on the effects of fungal and bacterial phytase with or without citric acid on growth performance, serum mineral profile, bone quality, and nutrient retention in broilers.","authors":"Rakhi Chowdhury, Md Aliar Rahman, Khan Md Shaiful Islam, Mohammad Al-Mamun","doi":"10.5455/javar.2024.k786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current research aimed to compare the effects of fungal and bacterial phytase with or without citric acid (CA) on growth performance, serum mineral profile, bone quality, and nutrient retention in birds given non-phytate phosphorus (nPP)-deficient diets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 216 Indian River broiler chicks were disturbed into six groups, namely, i) positive control (PC), ii) negative control (NC) contained 0.2% lower nPP than that in the PC diet, iii) NC + fungal phytase (<i>Aspergillus niger</i>), iv) NC + fungal phytase with 2% CA, v) NC + bacterial phytase (<i>Escherichia coli</i>), and vi) NC + bacterial phytase with 2% CA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the PC group, the NC group showed poor performance, serum phosphorus (P) content, P retention, and bone quality. However, with the inclusion of phytase, all these phenomena were improved. The addition of bacterial phytase showed better values compared with fungal phytase. The main effects of phytase were significant for the feed conversion ratio (FCR), metabolizable energy conversion ratio (MECR), and P retention. The addition of CA, either with fungal or bacterial phytases, did not show considerable beneficial effects on overall performances. However, the main effects of CA were significant on the FCR, MECR, and crude protein conversion ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating bacterial and fungal phytase into low-nPP diets enhanced the broiler's performance. The effects of bacterial phytase were more apparent than those of fungal phytase. However, the efficacy of phytase based on the source might relate to dose, and other factors need further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"376-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Current research aimed to compare the effects of fungal and bacterial phytase with or without citric acid (CA) on growth performance, serum mineral profile, bone quality, and nutrient retention in birds given non-phytate phosphorus (nPP)-deficient diets.

Materials and methods: A total of 216 Indian River broiler chicks were disturbed into six groups, namely, i) positive control (PC), ii) negative control (NC) contained 0.2% lower nPP than that in the PC diet, iii) NC + fungal phytase (Aspergillus niger), iv) NC + fungal phytase with 2% CA, v) NC + bacterial phytase (Escherichia coli), and vi) NC + bacterial phytase with 2% CA.

Results: Compared to the PC group, the NC group showed poor performance, serum phosphorus (P) content, P retention, and bone quality. However, with the inclusion of phytase, all these phenomena were improved. The addition of bacterial phytase showed better values compared with fungal phytase. The main effects of phytase were significant for the feed conversion ratio (FCR), metabolizable energy conversion ratio (MECR), and P retention. The addition of CA, either with fungal or bacterial phytases, did not show considerable beneficial effects on overall performances. However, the main effects of CA were significant on the FCR, MECR, and crude protein conversion ratio.

Conclusion: Incorporating bacterial and fungal phytase into low-nPP diets enhanced the broiler's performance. The effects of bacterial phytase were more apparent than those of fungal phytase. However, the efficacy of phytase based on the source might relate to dose, and other factors need further investigation.

关于添加或不添加柠檬酸的真菌和细菌植酸酶对肉鸡生长性能、血清矿物质含量、骨骼质量和营养保留的影响的比较研究。
研究目的目前的研究旨在比较添加或不添加柠檬酸(CA)的真菌和细菌植酸酶对饲喂非植酸磷(nPP)缺乏日粮的雏鸡的生长性能、血清矿物质概况、骨骼质量和营养保留的影响:将 216 只印度河肉用仔鸡分为 6 组,即 i) 阳性对照组(PC);ii) 阴性对照组(NC),NP 含量比 PC 日粮低 0.2%;iii) NC + 真菌植酸酶(黑曲霉);iv) NC + 真菌植酸酶与 2% CA;v) NC + 细菌植酸酶(大肠杆菌);vi) NC + 细菌植酸酶与 2% CA:与 PC 组相比,NC 组的表现、血清磷(P)含量、磷保持率和骨骼质量均较差。然而,添加植酸酶后,所有这些现象都得到了改善。与真菌植酸酶相比,细菌植酸酶的效果更好。植酸酶对饲料转化率(FCR)、代谢能转化率(MECR)和钙保留率的主效应显著。添加 CA(真菌或细菌植酸酶)并没有对总体性能产生显著的有利影响。然而,CA 的主效应对 FCR、MECR 和粗蛋白转化率有显著影响:结论:在低NPP日粮中添加细菌和真菌植酸酶可提高肉鸡的生产性能。细菌植酸酶的效果比真菌植酸酶更明显。不过,植酸酶的功效取决于其来源,可能与剂量有关,其他因素还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research (JAVAR) - is an open access, international, peer-reviewed, quarterly, highly-indexed scientific journal publishing original research findings and reviews on all aspects of veterinary and animal sciences. Basic and applied researches on- - Anatomy & histology - Animal health economics - Animal nutrition - Animal reproduction - Animal science - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - Biochemistry - Biotechnology - Dairy science - Epidemiology - Food hygiene and technology - Genetics and breeding - Immunology - Microbiology - Parasitology - Pathology - Pharmacology & toxicology - Physiology - Poultry science - Preventive veterinary medicine - Public health - Surgery & obstetrics - Veterinary extension studies - Wildlife & aquatic medicine - Zoo animal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信