Tetracycline Three Times Daily Versus Four Times Daily in Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy as the First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Helicobacter Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1111/hel.13121
Yu-Ming Ding, Qiu-Mei Zhang, Rui-Li Li, Zhong-Xue Han, Qing Zhao, Li-Dong Xu, Ke-Yu Wang, Xue-Ping Nan, Miao Duan, Shu-Yan Zeng, Qing-Zhou Kong, Hui Wang, Xiao-Qi Wu, Ning Zhang, Yan-Qing Li, Xiu-Li Zuo, Yue-Yue Li
{"title":"Tetracycline Three Times Daily Versus Four Times Daily in Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy as the First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Yu-Ming Ding,&nbsp;Qiu-Mei Zhang,&nbsp;Rui-Li Li,&nbsp;Zhong-Xue Han,&nbsp;Qing Zhao,&nbsp;Li-Dong Xu,&nbsp;Ke-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Xue-Ping Nan,&nbsp;Miao Duan,&nbsp;Shu-Yan Zeng,&nbsp;Qing-Zhou Kong,&nbsp;Hui Wang,&nbsp;Xiao-Qi Wu,&nbsp;Ning Zhang,&nbsp;Yan-Qing Li,&nbsp;Xiu-Li Zuo,&nbsp;Yue-Yue Li","doi":"10.1111/hel.13121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Current guidelines recommend bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for patients newly diagnosed with <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tetracycline administered three times daily versus four times daily in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for first-line treatment of <i>H. pylori</i> infection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled study, conducted in China, recruited treatment-naïve adults with <i>H. pylori</i> infection, randomized 1:1 into two treatment groups to receive either of the following bismuth-containing quadruple therapies: esomeprazole 20 mg twice-daily; bismuth 220 mg twice-daily; amoxicillin 1000 mg twice-daily; and tetracycline 500 mg three times daily (TET-T) versus 500 mg four times daily (TET-F). At least 6 weeks post-treatment, a <sup>13</sup>C-urea breath test was performed to evaluate <i>H. pylori</i> eradication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 406 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups. Intention-to-treat eradication rates were 91.63% (186/203; 95% confidence interval [CI] 87.82%–95.44%) versus 90.15% (183/203; 95% CI 86.05%–94.25%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0005) and per-protocol eradication rates were 95.34% (184/193; 95% CI 92.36%–98.31%) versus 95.72% (179/187; 95% CI 92.82%–98.62%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) for the TET-T and TET-F group, respectively. TET-T-treated patients had a lower incidence of adverse effects than TET-F-treated patients (21.61% vs. 31.63%, <i>p</i> = 0.024), with no significant differences in compliance to treatment between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>As a first-line therapy for <i>H. pylori</i> infection, the eradication rate of the TET-T therapy was noninferior to that of the TET-F therapy while significantly reducing the incidence of adverse reactions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05431075</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13223,"journal":{"name":"Helicobacter","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helicobacter","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.13121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Current guidelines recommend bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for patients newly diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tetracycline administered three times daily versus four times daily in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for first-line treatment of H. pylori infection.

Methods

This multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled study, conducted in China, recruited treatment-naïve adults with H. pylori infection, randomized 1:1 into two treatment groups to receive either of the following bismuth-containing quadruple therapies: esomeprazole 20 mg twice-daily; bismuth 220 mg twice-daily; amoxicillin 1000 mg twice-daily; and tetracycline 500 mg three times daily (TET-T) versus 500 mg four times daily (TET-F). At least 6 weeks post-treatment, a 13C-urea breath test was performed to evaluate H. pylori eradication.

Results

In total, 406 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups. Intention-to-treat eradication rates were 91.63% (186/203; 95% confidence interval [CI] 87.82%–95.44%) versus 90.15% (183/203; 95% CI 86.05%–94.25%) (p = 0.0005) and per-protocol eradication rates were 95.34% (184/193; 95% CI 92.36%–98.31%) versus 95.72% (179/187; 95% CI 92.82%–98.62%) (p = 0.0002) for the TET-T and TET-F group, respectively. TET-T-treated patients had a lower incidence of adverse effects than TET-F-treated patients (21.61% vs. 31.63%, p = 0.024), with no significant differences in compliance to treatment between the groups.

Conclusion

As a first-line therapy for H. pylori infection, the eradication rate of the TET-T therapy was noninferior to that of the TET-F therapy while significantly reducing the incidence of adverse reactions.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05431075

四环素每日三次与含铋四联疗法每日四次作为幽门螺旋杆菌感染的一线治疗:一项多中心、非劣效性、随机对照试验。
背景:目前的指南推荐对新诊断的幽门螺旋杆菌(H. pylori)感染患者进行含铋四联疗法。我们旨在比较四环素每日三次与含铋四联疗法每日四次在幽门螺杆菌感染一线治疗中的疗效和安全性:这项在中国开展的多中心、非劣效性随机对照研究招募了患有幽门螺杆菌感染的成人患者,按1:1的比例随机分为两个治疗组,分别接受以下含铋四联疗法中的任一种疗法:埃索美拉唑20毫克,每日两次;铋剂220毫克,每日两次;阿莫西林1000毫克,每日两次;四环素500毫克,每日三次(TET-T)与500毫克,每日四次(TET-F)。治疗后至少 6 周进行 13C- 尿素呼气试验,以评估幽门螺杆菌根除情况:共有 406 名患者被随机分配到两个治疗组。意向治疗根除率为 91.63%(186/203;95% 置信区间 [CI]:87.82%-95.44%)与 90.15%(183/203;95% 置信区间 [CI]:86.05%-94.25%)(P = 0.0005),TET-T 组和 TET-F 组的每协议根除率分别为 95.34% (184/193; 95% CI 92.36%-98.31%) 与 95.72% (179/187; 95% CI 92.82%-98.62%) (p = 0.0002)。TET-T治疗患者的不良反应发生率低于TET-F治疗患者(21.61% vs. 31.63%,p = 0.024),两组患者的治疗依从性无显著差异:结论:作为幽门螺杆菌感染的一线疗法,TET-T疗法的根除率不低于TET-F疗法,同时显著降低了不良反应的发生率:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT05431075。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Helicobacter
Helicobacter 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Helicobacter is edited by Professor David Y Graham. The editorial and peer review process is an independent process. Whenever there is a conflict of interest, the editor and editorial board will declare their interests and affiliations. Helicobacter recognises the critical role that has been established for Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma. As new helicobacter species are now regularly being discovered, Helicobacter covers the entire range of helicobacter research, increasing communication among the fields of gastroenterology; microbiology; vaccine development; laboratory animal science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信