High-Level Isolation: A Landscape Analysis of Global Capabilities and Opportunities to Advance the Field.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Security Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1089/hs.2023.0181
Jocelyn J Herstein, Joseph Lukowski, Wael ElRayes, John J Lowe, Aneesh K Mehta, Vikramjit Mukherjee, Katie L Stern, Sharon Vanairsdale Carrasco, Angela Vasa, Sami Vasistha, Lauren M Sauer
{"title":"High-Level Isolation: A Landscape Analysis of Global Capabilities and Opportunities to Advance the Field.","authors":"Jocelyn J Herstein, Joseph Lukowski, Wael ElRayes, John J Lowe, Aneesh K Mehta, Vikramjit Mukherjee, Katie L Stern, Sharon Vanairsdale Carrasco, Angela Vasa, Sami Vasistha, Lauren M Sauer","doi":"10.1089/hs.2023.0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-level isolation units (HLIUs) have been established by countries to provide safe and optimal medical care for patients with high-consequence infectious diseases. We aimed to identify global high-level isolation capabilities and determine gaps and priorities of global HLIUs, using a multiple method approach that included a systematic review of published and gray literature and a review of Joint External Evaluations and Global Health Security Index reports from 112 countries. A follow-up electronic survey was distributed to identified HLIUs. The landscape analysis found 44 previously designated/self-described HLIUs in 19 countries. An additional 33 countries had potential HLIUs; however, there were not enough details on capabilities to determine if they fit the HLIU definition. An electronic survey was distributed to 36 HLIUs to validate landscape analysis findings and to understand challenges, best practices, and priorities for increased networking with a global HLIU cohort; 31 (86%) HLIUs responded. Responses revealed an additional 30 confirmed HLIUs that were not identified in the landscape analysis. To our knowledge, this was the first mapping and the largest ever survey of global HLIUs. Survey findings identified major gaps in visibility of HLIUs: while our landscape analysis initially identified 44 units, the survey unveiled an additional 30 HLIUs that had not been previously identified or confirmed. The lack of formalized regional or global coordinating organizations exacerbates these visibility gaps. The unique characteristics and capabilities of these facilities, coupled with the likelihood these units serve as core components of national health security plans, provides an opportunity for increased connection and networking to advance the field of high-level isolation and address identified gaps in coordination, build an evidence base for HLIU approaches, and inform HLIU definitions and key components.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2023.0181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-level isolation units (HLIUs) have been established by countries to provide safe and optimal medical care for patients with high-consequence infectious diseases. We aimed to identify global high-level isolation capabilities and determine gaps and priorities of global HLIUs, using a multiple method approach that included a systematic review of published and gray literature and a review of Joint External Evaluations and Global Health Security Index reports from 112 countries. A follow-up electronic survey was distributed to identified HLIUs. The landscape analysis found 44 previously designated/self-described HLIUs in 19 countries. An additional 33 countries had potential HLIUs; however, there were not enough details on capabilities to determine if they fit the HLIU definition. An electronic survey was distributed to 36 HLIUs to validate landscape analysis findings and to understand challenges, best practices, and priorities for increased networking with a global HLIU cohort; 31 (86%) HLIUs responded. Responses revealed an additional 30 confirmed HLIUs that were not identified in the landscape analysis. To our knowledge, this was the first mapping and the largest ever survey of global HLIUs. Survey findings identified major gaps in visibility of HLIUs: while our landscape analysis initially identified 44 units, the survey unveiled an additional 30 HLIUs that had not been previously identified or confirmed. The lack of formalized regional or global coordinating organizations exacerbates these visibility gaps. The unique characteristics and capabilities of these facilities, coupled with the likelihood these units serve as core components of national health security plans, provides an opportunity for increased connection and networking to advance the field of high-level isolation and address identified gaps in coordination, build an evidence base for HLIU approaches, and inform HLIU definitions and key components.

高水平隔离:对全球能力和推动该领域发展的机遇的分析。
各国建立高级别隔离单位(HLIU)的目的是为高危传染病患者提供安全和最佳的医疗护理。我们采用多种方法,包括对已发表的文献和灰色文献进行系统回顾,以及对 112 个国家的联合外部评估和全球健康安全指数报告进行回顾,旨在确定全球高级别隔离能力,并确定全球高级别隔离单位的差距和优先事项。还向已确定的高级别医疗保险单位分发了后续电子调查表。情况分析发现,在 19 个国家中有 44 个先前指定/自述的高危重点单位。另有 33 个国家有潜在的高风险独立单位,但没有足够的能力细节来确定它们是否符合高风险独立单位的定义。向 36 个高地独立单位分发了电子调查表,以验证前景分析结果,并了解与全球高地独立单位群组加强联网所面临的挑战、最佳实践和优先事项;31 个(86%)高地独立单位做出了回应。答复显示,另有 30 个已确认的高阶层人士联谊单位在情况分析中没有发现。据我们所知,这是首次对全球高阶层人士联谊单位进行摸底调查,也是有史以来规模最大的一次调查。调查结果显示,高地小岛屿的知名度存在重大差距:虽然我们的景观分析初步确定了 44 个小岛屿,但调查发现还有 30 个高地小岛屿此前未被确定或确认。缺乏正式的地区或全球协调组织加剧了这些能见度差距。这些设施的独特性和能力,加上这些单位有可能成为国家卫生安全计划的核心组成部分,为加强联系和联网提供了机会,以推动高级隔离领域的发展,解决协调方面的差距,为高级隔离单位方法建立证据基础,并为高级隔离单位的定义和关键组成部分提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信