The cost-effectiveness of semaglutide in reducing cardiovascular risk among people with overweight and obesity and existing cardiovascular disease, but without diabetes.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ella Zomer, Jennifer Zhou, Adam J Nelson, Priya Sumithran, Shane Nanayakkara, Jocasta Ball, David Kaye, Danny Liew, Stephen J Nicholls, Dion Stub, Sophia Zoungas
{"title":"The cost-effectiveness of semaglutide in reducing cardiovascular risk among people with overweight and obesity and existing cardiovascular disease, but without diabetes.","authors":"Ella Zomer, Jennifer Zhou, Adam J Nelson, Priya Sumithran, Shane Nanayakkara, Jocasta Ball, David Kaye, Danny Liew, Stephen J Nicholls, Dion Stub, Sophia Zoungas","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular outcomes in people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overweight or obesity (but without diabetes). However, the cost of the medication has raised concerns about its financial viability and accessibility within healthcare systems. This study explored whether use of semaglutide for the secondary prevention of CVD in overweight or obesity is cost-effective from the Australian healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model was developed based on the SELECT trial to model the clinical outcomes and costs of a hypothetical population treated with semaglutide versus placebo, in addition to standard care, and followed up over 20 years. With each annual cycle, subjects were at risk of having non-fatal CVD events or dying. Model inputs were derived from SELECT and published literature. Costs were obtained from Australian sources. All outcomes were discounted by 5% annually. The main outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per year of life saved (YoLS) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With an annual estimated cost of semaglutide of A${\\$}$4175, the model resulted in ICERs of A${\\$}$99 853 (US${\\$}$143 504; £40 873) per YoLS and A${\\$}$96 055 (US${\\$}$138 046; £39 318) per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of A${\\$}$50 000, semaglutide is not considered cost-effective at the current price. A price of ≤ A${\\$}$2000 per year or more targeted use in high-risk patients would be needed for it to be considered cost-effective in the Australian setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular outcomes in people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overweight or obesity (but without diabetes). However, the cost of the medication has raised concerns about its financial viability and accessibility within healthcare systems. This study explored whether use of semaglutide for the secondary prevention of CVD in overweight or obesity is cost-effective from the Australian healthcare perspective.

Methods: A Markov model was developed based on the SELECT trial to model the clinical outcomes and costs of a hypothetical population treated with semaglutide versus placebo, in addition to standard care, and followed up over 20 years. With each annual cycle, subjects were at risk of having non-fatal CVD events or dying. Model inputs were derived from SELECT and published literature. Costs were obtained from Australian sources. All outcomes were discounted by 5% annually. The main outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per year of life saved (YoLS) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

Results: With an annual estimated cost of semaglutide of A${\$}$4175, the model resulted in ICERs of A${\$}$99 853 (US${\$}$143 504; £40 873) per YoLS and A${\$}$96 055 (US${\$}$138 046; £39 318) per QALY gained.

Conclusions: Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of A${\$}$50 000, semaglutide is not considered cost-effective at the current price. A price of ≤ A${\$}$2000 per year or more targeted use in high-risk patients would be needed for it to be considered cost-effective in the Australian setting.

在降低超重、肥胖和患有心血管疾病但未患糖尿病的人群的心血管风险方面,semaglutide 的成本效益。
背景和目的:塞马鲁肽对超重或肥胖症患者心血管预后的影响(SELECT)试验表明,心血管疾病(CVD)和超重或肥胖症(但无糖尿病)患者的心血管预后显著降低。然而,该药物的成本引起了人们对其经济可行性和在医疗系统中可获得性的担忧。本研究从澳大利亚医疗保健的角度探讨了使用塞马鲁肽对超重或肥胖症患者进行心血管疾病二级预防是否具有成本效益:方法:以 SELECT 试验为基础开发了一个马尔可夫模型,以模拟假设人群在接受标准治疗的基础上,使用塞马鲁肽和安慰剂治疗的临床结果和成本,并进行 20 年的随访。在每个年度周期中,受试者都有发生非致命心血管疾病事件或死亡的风险。模型输入来自 SELECT 和已发表的文献。成本来自澳大利亚。所有结果每年贴现 5%。主要研究结果是增量成本效益比(ICER),即每挽救一年生命的成本(YoLS)和每提高一个质量调整生命年的成本(QALY):该模型估算出的semaglutide年成本为4175美元,每挽救一年生命的ICER为99853美元(143504美元;40873英镑),每获得一个质量调整生命年的ICER为96055美元(138046美元;39318英镑):假定支付意愿阈值为 50 000 美元,按照目前的价格,塞马鲁肽不具有成本效益。在澳大利亚,每年≤2000澳元的价格或更多针对高危患者的价格才能被认为具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信