ChatGPT and retinal disease: a cross-sectional study on AI comprehension of clinical guidelines.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Michael Balas, Efrem D Mandelcorn, Peng Yan, Edsel B Ing, Sean A Crawford, Parnian Arjmand
{"title":"ChatGPT and retinal disease: a cross-sectional study on AI comprehension of clinical guidelines.","authors":"Michael Balas, Efrem D Mandelcorn, Peng Yan, Edsel B Ing, Sean A Crawford, Parnian Arjmand","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) large language model, ChatGPT (version 4.0), for common retinal diseases, in accordance with the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study design was employed to compare the responses made by ChatGPT to established clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Responses by the AI were reviewed by a panel of three vitreoretinal specialists for evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To investigate ChatGPT's comprehension of clinical guidelines, we designed 130 questions covering a broad spectrum of topics within 12 AAO PPP domains of retinal disease These questions were crafted to encompass diagnostic criteria, treatment guidelines, and management strategies, including both medical and surgical aspects of retinal care. A panel of 3 retinal specialists independently evaluated responses on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 based on their relevance, accuracy, and adherence to AAO PPP guidelines. Response readability was evaluated using Flesch Readability Ease and Flesch-Kincaid grade level scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT achieved an overall average score of 4.9/5.0, suggesting high alignment with the AAO PPP guidelines. Scores varied across domains, with the lowest in the surgical management of disease. The responses had a low reading ease score and required a college-to-graduate level of comprehension. Identified errors were related to diagnostic criteria, treatment options, and methodological procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT 4.0 demonstrated significant potential in generating guideline-concordant responses, particularly for common medical retinal diseases. However, its performance slightly decreased in surgical retina, highlighting the ongoing need for clinician input, further model refinement, and improved comprehensibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.06.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) large language model, ChatGPT (version 4.0), for common retinal diseases, in accordance with the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP) guidelines.

Design: A cross-sectional survey study design was employed to compare the responses made by ChatGPT to established clinical guidelines.

Participants: Responses by the AI were reviewed by a panel of three vitreoretinal specialists for evaluation.

Methods: To investigate ChatGPT's comprehension of clinical guidelines, we designed 130 questions covering a broad spectrum of topics within 12 AAO PPP domains of retinal disease These questions were crafted to encompass diagnostic criteria, treatment guidelines, and management strategies, including both medical and surgical aspects of retinal care. A panel of 3 retinal specialists independently evaluated responses on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 based on their relevance, accuracy, and adherence to AAO PPP guidelines. Response readability was evaluated using Flesch Readability Ease and Flesch-Kincaid grade level scores.

Results: ChatGPT achieved an overall average score of 4.9/5.0, suggesting high alignment with the AAO PPP guidelines. Scores varied across domains, with the lowest in the surgical management of disease. The responses had a low reading ease score and required a college-to-graduate level of comprehension. Identified errors were related to diagnostic criteria, treatment options, and methodological procedures.

Conclusion: ChatGPT 4.0 demonstrated significant potential in generating guideline-concordant responses, particularly for common medical retinal diseases. However, its performance slightly decreased in surgical retina, highlighting the ongoing need for clinician input, further model refinement, and improved comprehensibility.

ChatGPT 与视网膜疾病:关于人工智能对临床指南理解的横断面研究。
目的:评估人工智能(AI)大型语言模型 ChatGPT(4.0 版)的性能:根据美国眼科学会(AAO)首选实践模式(PPP)指南,评估人工智能(AI)大型语言模型 ChatGPT(4.0 版)在常见视网膜疾病方面的性能:设计:采用横断面调查研究设计,将 ChatGPT 的回答与既定的临床指南进行比较:由三位玻璃体视网膜专家组成的小组对人工智能的回答进行了评估:为了调查 ChatGPT 对临床指南的理解能力,我们设计了 130 个问题,这些问题涵盖了 AAO PPP 的 12 个视网膜疾病领域中的广泛主题。由 3 位视网膜专家组成的小组根据回答的相关性、准确性以及是否符合 AAO PPP 指南,采用 1-5 级李克特量表对回答进行独立评估。回答的可读性采用 Flesch 可读性易读性和 Flesch-Kincaid 等级评分进行评估:结果:ChatGPT 的总体平均得分为 4.9/5.0,表明与 AAO PPP 指南高度一致。各领域的得分不尽相同,疾病的外科治疗得分最低。回复的阅读易读性得分较低,需要大学到研究生水平的理解能力。发现的错误与诊断标准、治疗方案和方法程序有关:结论:ChatGPT 4.0 在生成与指南一致的回复方面表现出了巨大的潜力,尤其是在常见的内科视网膜疾病方面。然而,它在手术视网膜方面的性能略有下降,这突出表明临床医生仍需不断输入信息、进一步完善模型并提高可理解性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信