The role of sociomateriality in the formalisation and legitimation practices of openness paradox

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Cassia Goulart Heinzen, Rosalia Aldraci Barbosa Lavarda, Christiane Bellucci
{"title":"The role of sociomateriality in the formalisation and legitimation practices of openness paradox","authors":"Cassia Goulart Heinzen, Rosalia Aldraci Barbosa Lavarda, Christiane Bellucci","doi":"10.1108/jsma-11-2023-0282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p> This study seeks to comprehend how sociomateriality influences the openness paradox within the context of open strategising.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> We adopted a qualitative approach and developed a case study as a research method. The data included 10 semi-structured interviews, direct observation and documentary analysis, including virtual documents, collaborative platforms and communication systems.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p> We found that sociomateriality influences the transition between openness and closure in open strategy (OS) dimensions, namely inclusion, participation and transparency, once organisational practitioners actively build on social relationships and engage with material elements within this paradoxical context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p> The primary limitation was the challenge of managing extensive data, especially tracking all meetings and interactions. Nonetheless, we aimed to provide a comprehensive view and meaningful insights from the data. Future research could employ mixed methods to achieve a more holistic understanding of the phenomenon.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p> By understanding the role of formalisation and legitimation played by sociomateriality during open strategising, practitioners can navigate the complexities of balancing openness and closure, fostering innovation and engagement while ensuring the legitimacy of strategising. Recognising the coexistence of exclusions in social practices enables society to comprehend this paradox and highlight the need to address it, fostering an inclusive environment and promoting balanced openness in various social contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p> Our study contributes to the OS literature by highlighting the role of sociomateriality in shaping the openness and closure interplay. Additionally, we emphasise the importance of formalisation and legitimation practices involving materiality in the balance between openness and closure in a context where openness is deemed essential for strategic success.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategy and Management","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-11-2023-0282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study seeks to comprehend how sociomateriality influences the openness paradox within the context of open strategising.

Design/methodology/approach

We adopted a qualitative approach and developed a case study as a research method. The data included 10 semi-structured interviews, direct observation and documentary analysis, including virtual documents, collaborative platforms and communication systems.

Findings

We found that sociomateriality influences the transition between openness and closure in open strategy (OS) dimensions, namely inclusion, participation and transparency, once organisational practitioners actively build on social relationships and engage with material elements within this paradoxical context.

Research limitations/implications

The primary limitation was the challenge of managing extensive data, especially tracking all meetings and interactions. Nonetheless, we aimed to provide a comprehensive view and meaningful insights from the data. Future research could employ mixed methods to achieve a more holistic understanding of the phenomenon.

Practical implications

By understanding the role of formalisation and legitimation played by sociomateriality during open strategising, practitioners can navigate the complexities of balancing openness and closure, fostering innovation and engagement while ensuring the legitimacy of strategising. Recognising the coexistence of exclusions in social practices enables society to comprehend this paradox and highlight the need to address it, fostering an inclusive environment and promoting balanced openness in various social contexts.

Originality/value

Our study contributes to the OS literature by highlighting the role of sociomateriality in shaping the openness and closure interplay. Additionally, we emphasise the importance of formalisation and legitimation practices involving materiality in the balance between openness and closure in a context where openness is deemed essential for strategic success.

社会物质性在开放悖论的正规化与合法化实践中的作用
目的 本研究旨在了解社会物质性如何影响开放战略背景下的开放性悖论。研究结果 我们发现,一旦组织实践者在这种矛盾的背景下积极建立社会关系并接触物质元素,社会物质性就会影响开放战略(OS)的开放性和封闭性之间的转变,即包容性、参与性和透明度。然而,我们的目标是从数据中提供全面的观点和有意义的见解。通过了解社会物质性在开放式战略制定过程中发挥的正规化和合法化作用,实践者可以驾驭平衡开放性和封闭性的复杂性,在确保战略制定合法性的同时促进创新和参与。认识到社会实践中排斥现象的共存,可以让社会理解这一悖论,并强调解决这一问题的必要性,从而在各种社会背景下营造包容性环境,促进平衡开放。此外,我们还强调了在开放性被认为是战略成功的必要条件的背景下,涉及物质性的正规化和合法化实践在开放性和封闭性之间平衡的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategy and Management is an international journal dedicated to: -improving the existing knowledge and understanding of strategy development and implementation globally in private and public organizations -encouraging new thinking and innovative approaches to the study of strategy -offering executives strategic insights based on outcomes of original scholarly research; and -establishing effective communication between researchers and executives managing public and private organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信