A matter of timing? A systematic review of work scheduling dynamics in work recovery research and applications

IF 6.2 2区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1002/job.2825

Molly M. Sloan, Cortney Busick, Tanya Mitropoulos, Fiyinfunjah Dosumu, Charles Calderwood

{"title":"A matter of timing? A systematic review of work scheduling dynamics in work recovery research and applications","authors":"Molly M. Sloan, Cortney Busick, Tanya Mitropoulos, Fiyinfunjah Dosumu, Charles Calderwood","doi":"10.1002/job.2825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryWork recovery reflects the replenishment of personal resources depleted by working, which has implications for employee health and wellness. However, work scheduling factors have received very limited attention in the recovery literature, despite that recovery is a dynamic process widely recognized to be influenced by contextual factors that define and influence the work role. After first conducting a narrative review of whether and how work scheduling factors are accounted for in existing theories of work recovery, we conduct a systematic review of existing work recovery research to identify any past empirical consideration of work scheduling factors in the recovery research base. We then harness the results of this systematic review to develop a taxonomy of work scheduling and related contextual factors that may be relevant to the process of recovery from work. We discuss the theoretical, practical, and methodological implications that emerged from our narrative and systematic reviews, providing guidance for how this newly developed taxonomy can be applied to understanding the implications of scheduling dynamics for work recovery across a range of different work contexts.","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

SummaryWork recovery reflects the replenishment of personal resources depleted by working, which has implications for employee health and wellness. However, work scheduling factors have received very limited attention in the recovery literature, despite that recovery is a dynamic process widely recognized to be influenced by contextual factors that define and influence the work role. After first conducting a narrative review of whether and how work scheduling factors are accounted for in existing theories of work recovery, we conduct a systematic review of existing work recovery research to identify any past empirical consideration of work scheduling factors in the recovery research base. We then harness the results of this systematic review to develop a taxonomy of work scheduling and related contextual factors that may be relevant to the process of recovery from work. We discuss the theoretical, practical, and methodological implications that emerged from our narrative and systematic reviews, providing guidance for how this newly developed taxonomy can be applied to understanding the implications of scheduling dynamics for work recovery across a range of different work contexts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

时机问题？工作恢复研究和应用中的工作安排动态系统回顾

摘要工作恢复反映了对因工作而耗尽的个人资源的补充，这对员工的健康和幸福有影响。然而，尽管人们普遍认为工作恢复是一个动态过程，会受到定义和影响工作角色的环境因素的影响，但工作安排因素在工作恢复文献中受到的关注却非常有限。我们首先对现有的工作康复理论是否以及如何考虑工作时间安排因素进行了叙述性回顾，然后对现有的工作康复研究进行了系统性回顾，以确定过去在康复研究基础中对工作时间安排因素的经验性考虑。然后，我们利用这一系统性回顾的结果，对可能与工作恢复过程相关的工作安排和相关背景因素进行分类。我们将讨论从我们的叙述性回顾和系统性回顾中得出的理论、实践和方法论意义，为如何将这一新开发的分类法应用于理解不同工作背景下工作安排动态对工作恢复的影响提供指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Organizational Behavior Multiple-

CiteScore

10.50

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.