Highly variable bark-wood density relationships across tree species reflect tradeoffs in evolved tolerances to environmental stressors

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s00468-024-02548-z
David W. MacFarlane
{"title":"Highly variable bark-wood density relationships across tree species reflect tradeoffs in evolved tolerances to environmental stressors","authors":"David W. MacFarlane","doi":"10.1007/s00468-024-02548-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Key message</h3><p><b>Tree bark and wood density are highly variable and weakly positively correlated, with species having more or less dense bark than wood to adapt to different environmental stressors.</b></p><p>Tree bark is a complex, multifunctional structure and bark density varies widely across species. While wood density is recognized as a fundamental indicator of the functional ecology of trees, bark density has received much less attention as a key functional trait. Theoretically, bark and wood density should co-vary to some degree, but comprehensive examinations of this covariation are scarce. How do key functional traits of individual trees and species relate to bark and wood density variation/covariation? How does a tree’s life history and evolved tolerance to environmental stress shape variation/covariation in bark and wood density? This study draws from published literature and a large database of individual tree measurements of trees of diverse species and growing conditions, from forest ecosystems across the United States and Canada, to understand covariation between bark and wood density and its relationship to life-history traits and evolved tolerances to environmental stressors. The results of this study show a high tree-to-tree variation in both bark density and wood density, with inherited differences in tissue formation constraining the range of bark and wood densities. All analyses show that bark density was weakly, positively correlated with wood density. Mixed effects modeling showed a strong phylogenetic signal in variation in bark and wood density that was partially explained by the need for species to produce more or less -dense bark and wood to adapt to different environmental stressors (tolerance of drought, shade, frost, waterlogging and fire were all examined), with clearly different relationships for angiosperms versus gymnosperms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"38 5","pages":"1223 - 1239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-024-02548-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Key message

Tree bark and wood density are highly variable and weakly positively correlated, with species having more or less dense bark than wood to adapt to different environmental stressors.

Tree bark is a complex, multifunctional structure and bark density varies widely across species. While wood density is recognized as a fundamental indicator of the functional ecology of trees, bark density has received much less attention as a key functional trait. Theoretically, bark and wood density should co-vary to some degree, but comprehensive examinations of this covariation are scarce. How do key functional traits of individual trees and species relate to bark and wood density variation/covariation? How does a tree’s life history and evolved tolerance to environmental stress shape variation/covariation in bark and wood density? This study draws from published literature and a large database of individual tree measurements of trees of diverse species and growing conditions, from forest ecosystems across the United States and Canada, to understand covariation between bark and wood density and its relationship to life-history traits and evolved tolerances to environmental stressors. The results of this study show a high tree-to-tree variation in both bark density and wood density, with inherited differences in tissue formation constraining the range of bark and wood densities. All analyses show that bark density was weakly, positively correlated with wood density. Mixed effects modeling showed a strong phylogenetic signal in variation in bark and wood density that was partially explained by the need for species to produce more or less -dense bark and wood to adapt to different environmental stressors (tolerance of drought, shade, frost, waterlogging and fire were all examined), with clearly different relationships for angiosperms versus gymnosperms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同树种树皮-木材密度关系的高度变化反映了对环境压力的进化耐受性的权衡
树皮是一种复杂的多功能结构,不同物种的树皮密度差异很大。木材密度被认为是树木功能生态学的基本指标,而树皮密度作为一种关键的功能特征却很少受到关注。从理论上讲,树皮密度和木材密度在某种程度上应该是共变的,但对这种共变的全面研究却很少。个体树木和物种的关键功能特征与树皮和木材密度的变化/共变有何关系?树木的生活史和对环境压力的进化耐受性如何影响树皮和木材密度的变化/变异?本研究利用已发表的文献和一个大型数据库,对美国和加拿大森林生态系统中不同物种和生长条件的树木进行个体测量,以了解树皮和木材密度之间的共变性及其与生命史特征和对环境压力的进化耐受性之间的关系。研究结果表明,树皮密度和木材密度在树与树之间的差异很大,组织形成的遗传差异限制了树皮密度和木材密度的范围。所有分析表明,树皮密度与木材密度呈弱正相关。混合效应模型显示,树皮和木材密度的变异具有很强的系统发育信号,其部分原因是物种需要生产密度较高或较低的树皮和木材,以适应不同的环境压力(对干旱、遮荫、霜冻、水涝和火灾的耐受性都进行了研究),被子植物和裸子植物之间的关系明显不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信