Can premium subsidies for agricultural insurance promote risk protection on natural disasters? Evidence from China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jiangqiang Chen , Dan Fang , Bin Chen , Saige Wang
{"title":"Can premium subsidies for agricultural insurance promote risk protection on natural disasters? Evidence from China","authors":"Jiangqiang Chen ,&nbsp;Dan Fang ,&nbsp;Bin Chen ,&nbsp;Saige Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many countries have implemented premium subsidies for agricultural insurance to prevent the spread of natural disaster risks. However, whether such subsidies on agricultural insurance promoted the risk protection level remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the impact of premium subsidies on the risk protection level of agricultural insurance in China by combining the input-output (IO) model with the difference-in-difference (DID) model, using provincial panel data of China from 2003 to 2016. The IO model was employed to calculate direct and indirect economic losses from natural disasters. A risk protection level index was constructed by evaluating the loss compensation ability of agricultural insurance. The time-varying DID model was applied along with robustness tests to identify the effects of subsidies on the risk protection level. Heterogeneity analysis was conducted according to different levels of natural disaster losses. The results revealed that, on average, indirect losses accounted for 38% of annual total economic losses at a national scale. With the implementation of premium subsidies, the risk protection level significantly increased. Heterogeneity analysis indicated that the positive effect of subsidies was more evident in areas with higher economic losses as well as higher incidence of disasters. By evaluating the risk protection level of agricultural insurance and the effects of subsidies, this study aims to provide insights for subsidy design to mitigate economic losses from natural disasters and promote agricultural resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 107615"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many countries have implemented premium subsidies for agricultural insurance to prevent the spread of natural disaster risks. However, whether such subsidies on agricultural insurance promoted the risk protection level remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the impact of premium subsidies on the risk protection level of agricultural insurance in China by combining the input-output (IO) model with the difference-in-difference (DID) model, using provincial panel data of China from 2003 to 2016. The IO model was employed to calculate direct and indirect economic losses from natural disasters. A risk protection level index was constructed by evaluating the loss compensation ability of agricultural insurance. The time-varying DID model was applied along with robustness tests to identify the effects of subsidies on the risk protection level. Heterogeneity analysis was conducted according to different levels of natural disaster losses. The results revealed that, on average, indirect losses accounted for 38% of annual total economic losses at a national scale. With the implementation of premium subsidies, the risk protection level significantly increased. Heterogeneity analysis indicated that the positive effect of subsidies was more evident in areas with higher economic losses as well as higher incidence of disasters. By evaluating the risk protection level of agricultural insurance and the effects of subsidies, this study aims to provide insights for subsidy design to mitigate economic losses from natural disasters and promote agricultural resilience.

农业保险保费补贴能否促进自然灾害风险保障?来自中国的证据
许多国家对农业保险实行保费补贴,以防止自然灾害风险的蔓延。然而,这种对农业保险的补贴是否促进了风险保障水平的提高仍不明确。在本研究中,我们利用中国 2003 年至 2016 年的省级面板数据,结合投入产出(IO)模型和差分(DID)模型,评估了保费补贴对中国农业保险风险保障水平的影响。采用 IO 模型计算自然灾害造成的直接和间接经济损失。通过评估农业保险的损失补偿能力,构建了风险保障水平指数。应用时变 DID 模型和稳健性检验来识别补贴对风险保障水平的影响。根据不同的自然灾害损失水平进行了异质性分析。结果显示,在全国范围内,间接损失平均占年度总经济损失的 38%。随着保费补贴的实施,风险保护水平显著提高。异质性分析表明,在经济损失较高、灾害发生率较高的地区,补贴的积极作用更为明显。通过评估农业保险的风险保护水平和补贴效果,本研究旨在为补贴设计提供启示,以减轻自然灾害造成的经济损失,提高农业抗灾能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信