IRJIT: A simple, online, information retrieval approach for just-in-time software defect prediction

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Hareem Sahar, Abdul Ali Bangash, Abram Hindle, Denilson Barbosa
{"title":"IRJIT: A simple, online, information retrieval approach for just-in-time software defect prediction","authors":"Hareem Sahar, Abdul Ali Bangash, Abram Hindle, Denilson Barbosa","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10514-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Just-in-Time software defect prediction (JIT-SDP) prevents the introduction of defects into the software by identifying them at commit check-in time. Current software defect prediction approaches rely on manually crafted features such as change metrics and involve expensive to train machine learning or deep learning models. These models typically involve extensive training processes that may require significant computational resources and time. These characteristics can pose challenges when attempting to update the models in real-time as new examples become available, potentially impacting their suitability for fast online defect prediction. Furthermore, the reliance on a complex underlying model makes these approaches often less <i>explainable</i>, which means the developers cannot understand the reasons behind models’ predictions. An approach that is not <i>explainable</i> might not be adopted in real-life development environments because of developers’ lack of trust in its results. To address these limitations, we propose an approach called IRJIT that employs information retrieval on source code and labels new commits as buggy or clean based on their similarity to past buggy or clean commits. IRJIT approach is <i>online</i> and <i>explainable</i> as it can learn from new data without expensive retraining, and developers can see the documents that support a prediction, providing additional context. By evaluating 10 open-source datasets in a within project setting, we show that our approach is up to 112 times faster than the state-of-the-art ML and DL approaches, offers explainability at the commit and line level, and has comparable performance to the state-of-the-art.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"182 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10514-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Just-in-Time software defect prediction (JIT-SDP) prevents the introduction of defects into the software by identifying them at commit check-in time. Current software defect prediction approaches rely on manually crafted features such as change metrics and involve expensive to train machine learning or deep learning models. These models typically involve extensive training processes that may require significant computational resources and time. These characteristics can pose challenges when attempting to update the models in real-time as new examples become available, potentially impacting their suitability for fast online defect prediction. Furthermore, the reliance on a complex underlying model makes these approaches often less explainable, which means the developers cannot understand the reasons behind models’ predictions. An approach that is not explainable might not be adopted in real-life development environments because of developers’ lack of trust in its results. To address these limitations, we propose an approach called IRJIT that employs information retrieval on source code and labels new commits as buggy or clean based on their similarity to past buggy or clean commits. IRJIT approach is online and explainable as it can learn from new data without expensive retraining, and developers can see the documents that support a prediction, providing additional context. By evaluating 10 open-source datasets in a within project setting, we show that our approach is up to 112 times faster than the state-of-the-art ML and DL approaches, offers explainability at the commit and line level, and has comparable performance to the state-of-the-art.

Abstract Image

IRJIT:用于及时软件缺陷预测的简单在线信息检索方法
准时软件缺陷预测(JIT-SDP)通过在提交签入时识别缺陷,防止将缺陷引入软件。目前的软件缺陷预测方法依赖于人工制作的特征,如变更度量,以及昂贵的机器学习或深度学习模型训练。这些模型通常涉及大量的训练过程,可能需要大量的计算资源和时间。当有新实例可用时,试图实时更新模型时,这些特征可能会带来挑战,从而可能影响它们对快速在线缺陷预测的适用性。此外,由于依赖于复杂的底层模型,这些方法的可解释性往往较差,这意味着开发人员无法理解模型预测背后的原因。由于开发人员对其结果缺乏信任,无法解释的方法可能不会在现实开发环境中被采用。为了解决这些局限性,我们提出了一种名为 IRJIT 的方法,它采用源代码信息检索,并根据新提交与过去的错误或干净提交的相似度将其标记为错误或干净。IRJIT 方法是在线的、可解释的,因为它可以从新数据中学习,无需昂贵的再训练,而且开发人员可以看到支持预测的文档,从而提供额外的上下文。通过在项目环境中评估 10 个开源数据集,我们发现我们的方法比最先进的 ML 和 DL 方法快 112 倍,在提交和行级别提供了可解释性,性能与最先进的方法相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信