A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Fundamental Periods in Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Pramod Kumar, Abhilash Gogineni, Amit Kumar, Prakhar Modi
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Fundamental Periods in Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings","authors":"Pramod Kumar, Abhilash Gogineni, Amit Kumar, Prakhar Modi","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01560-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Determining the fundamental period is a critical aspect of the analysis and design of structures. Existing literature formulas for evaluating this parameter exhibit a wide range of variations. To tackle this problem, various algorithms and techniques are used to learn patterns and relationships from data, enabling to make more precise predictions. In the present study, a dataset consisting of 162 RC frame-building models was analyzed using ETABS 2016. The fundamental period, a critical output parameter, is predicted using four machine-learning models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR). The performance and accuracy of these models were compared to identify the best-performing model for predicting the fundamental period in structural analysis. The efficiency and precision of the machine learning algorithms were assessed based on the R<sup>2</sup> and root mean square error (RMSE) values. Among all the models, the GBR exhibited the best performance with an R<sup>2</sup> (Coefficient of determination) score of 0.9995 and an RMSE of 0.017. These results indicate that the GBR model achieved a high level of accuracy and a low level of prediction error in estimating the fundamental period of the RC frame-building models.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01560-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the fundamental period is a critical aspect of the analysis and design of structures. Existing literature formulas for evaluating this parameter exhibit a wide range of variations. To tackle this problem, various algorithms and techniques are used to learn patterns and relationships from data, enabling to make more precise predictions. In the present study, a dataset consisting of 162 RC frame-building models was analyzed using ETABS 2016. The fundamental period, a critical output parameter, is predicted using four machine-learning models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR). The performance and accuracy of these models were compared to identify the best-performing model for predicting the fundamental period in structural analysis. The efficiency and precision of the machine learning algorithms were assessed based on the R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) values. Among all the models, the GBR exhibited the best performance with an R2 (Coefficient of determination) score of 0.9995 and an RMSE of 0.017. These results indicate that the GBR model achieved a high level of accuracy and a low level of prediction error in estimating the fundamental period of the RC frame-building models.

Abstract Image

预测钢筋混凝土框架结构建筑基本周期的机器学习算法比较分析
确定基本周期是结构分析和设计的一个重要方面。现有文献中用于评估这一参数的公式存在很大差异。为了解决这个问题,人们使用各种算法和技术从数据中学习模式和关系,从而做出更精确的预测。本研究使用 ETABS 2016 分析了由 162 个 RC 框架建筑模型组成的数据集。基本周期是一个关键的输出参数,使用四种机器学习模型进行预测:支持向量机 (SVM)、随机森林 (RF)、人工神经网络 (ANN) 和梯度提升回归 (GBR)。通过比较这些模型的性能和准确性,找出了在结构分析中预测基本周期的最佳模型。根据 R2 和均方根误差 (RMSE) 值评估了机器学习算法的效率和精确度。在所有模型中,GBR 表现最佳,其 R2(判定系数)为 0.9995,均方根误差为 0.017。这些结果表明,GBR 模型在估算 RC 框架建筑模型的基本周期方面达到了较高的精确度和较低的预测误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信