The short- and mid-term efficacy and safety of elagolix in the management of pain associated with endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yue Zhang, Wei Wei, En Chang, Yan-en Leng, Yi Hou, Xi Wei, Xin Yue, Li Zhong, Jin-feng Liu
{"title":"The short- and mid-term efficacy and safety of elagolix in the management of pain associated with endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yue Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Wei,&nbsp;En Chang,&nbsp;Yan-en Leng,&nbsp;Yi Hou,&nbsp;Xi Wei,&nbsp;Xin Yue,&nbsp;Li Zhong,&nbsp;Jin-feng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Elagolix, an approved non-peptide GnRH antagonist, shows promise in relieving endometriosis-related pain, but its short- and mid-term efficacy and potential side effects are still under investigation.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim is to provide data for therapeutic applications by methodically evaluating elagolix's safety and effectiveness in treating endometriosis-related pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and others were thoroughly searched. The search time was from the establishment date to September 2023. The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of elagolix versus placebo in treating endometriosis-associated pain. After data extraction and literature scanning, quality assessment was carried out using Quality evaluation was carried out using the bias risk assessment tool suggested by the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 5.1.0 after literature screening and data extraction. Stata 15.0 was used to do the meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, five RCTs involving 2056 patients were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant superiority of elagolix over placebo in the management of endometriosis-related pain, specifically in endometriosis pain [WMD=-0.77, 95% CI (-1.00, -0.53), P&lt;0.001], as well as in non-menstrual pelvic pain, daily assessment of dysmenorrhea (DYS), and dyspareunia (DYSP), all of which are associated with endometriosis. Regarding safety, no discernible variation was observed in the incidence of serious adverse responses between the elagolix and placebo groups [RR=0.90, 95% CI (0.58, 1.40), P=0.643]. Conversely, the elagolix group exhibited a significantly higher incidence rate of general adverse responses [RR = 1.34, 95% CI (1.18, 1.52), P&lt;0.001] compared to the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The efficacy of elagolix in reducing pain in premenopausal women with endometriosis has been demonstrated over the short- to mid-term. However, careful monitoring for potential adverse effects is essential throughout the treatment duration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 9","pages":"Article 102829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Elagolix, an approved non-peptide GnRH antagonist, shows promise in relieving endometriosis-related pain, but its short- and mid-term efficacy and potential side effects are still under investigation.

Objective

The aim is to provide data for therapeutic applications by methodically evaluating elagolix's safety and effectiveness in treating endometriosis-related pain.

Methods

Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and others were thoroughly searched. The search time was from the establishment date to September 2023. The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of elagolix versus placebo in treating endometriosis-associated pain. After data extraction and literature scanning, quality assessment was carried out using Quality evaluation was carried out using the bias risk assessment tool suggested by the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 5.1.0 after literature screening and data extraction. Stata 15.0 was used to do the meta-analysis.

Results

In total, five RCTs involving 2056 patients were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant superiority of elagolix over placebo in the management of endometriosis-related pain, specifically in endometriosis pain [WMD=-0.77, 95% CI (-1.00, -0.53), P<0.001], as well as in non-menstrual pelvic pain, daily assessment of dysmenorrhea (DYS), and dyspareunia (DYSP), all of which are associated with endometriosis. Regarding safety, no discernible variation was observed in the incidence of serious adverse responses between the elagolix and placebo groups [RR=0.90, 95% CI (0.58, 1.40), P=0.643]. Conversely, the elagolix group exhibited a significantly higher incidence rate of general adverse responses [RR = 1.34, 95% CI (1.18, 1.52), P<0.001] compared to the control group.

Conclusions

The efficacy of elagolix in reducing pain in premenopausal women with endometriosis has been demonstrated over the short- to mid-term. However, careful monitoring for potential adverse effects is essential throughout the treatment duration.

艾拉戈利治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的短期和中期疗效及安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
Elagolix是一种已获批准的非肽类GnRH拮抗剂,有望缓解子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛,但其短期和中期疗效及潜在副作用仍在研究中。该研究旨在通过有条不紊地评估艾拉戈利治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的安全性和有效性,为治疗应用提供数据。对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov 等数据库进行了全面检索。搜索时间从建立之日起至 2023 年 9 月。研究纳入了比较艾拉戈利与安慰剂治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。在进行数据提取和文献扫描后,使用 Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 5.1.0 建议的偏倚风险评估工具进行质量评估。使用 Stata 15.0 进行荟萃分析。分析共纳入了 5 项 RCT,涉及 2056 名患者。荟萃分析表明,在治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛,特别是子宫内膜异位症疼痛[WMD=-0.77,95% CI (-1.00,-0.53),P<0.001],以及非经期盆腔疼痛、痛经日常评估(DYS)和性生活障碍(DYSP)方面,艾拉戈利显着优于安慰剂,所有这些都与子宫内膜异位症有关。在安全性方面,艾拉戈利组和安慰剂组的严重不良反应发生率没有明显差异[RR=0.90,95% CI (0.58,1.40),P=0.643]。相反,与对照组相比,艾拉戈利组的一般不良反应发生率明显更高[RR=1.34,95% CI (1.18,1.52),P<0.001]。艾拉戈利在减轻绝经前子宫内膜异位症妇女疼痛方面的疗效已在中短期内得到证实。不过,在整个治疗期间,仔细监测潜在的不良反应至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信