Utilizing deep learning model for assessing melanocytic density in resection margins of lentigo maligna

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Jan Siarov, Darshan Kumar, John Paoli, Johan Mölne, Martin Gillstedt, Neittaanmäki Noora
{"title":"Utilizing deep learning model for assessing melanocytic density in resection margins of lentigo maligna","authors":"Jan Siarov, Darshan Kumar, John Paoli, Johan Mölne, Martin Gillstedt, Neittaanmäki Noora","doi":"10.1186/s13000-024-01532-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgical excision with clear histopathological margins is the preferred treatment to prevent progression of lentigo maligna (LM) to invasive melanoma. However, the assessment of resection margins on sun-damaged skin is challenging. We developed a deep learning model for detection of melanocytes in resection margins of LM. In total, 353 whole slide images (WSIs) were included. 295 WSIs were used for training and 58 for validation and testing. The algorithm was trained with 3,973 manual pixel-wise annotations. The AI analyses were compared to those of three blinded dermatopathologists and two pathology residents, who performed their evaluations without AI and AI-assisted. Immunohistochemistry (SOX10) served as the reference standard. We used a dichotomized cutoff for low and high risk of recurrence (≤ 25 melanocytes in an area of 0.5 mm for low risk and > 25 for high risk). The AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 in discriminating margins with low and high recurrence risk. In comparison, the AUC for dermatopathologists ranged from 0.72 to 0.90 and for the residents in pathology, 0.68 to 0.80. Additionally, with aid of the AI model the performance of two pathologists significantly improved. The deep learning showed notable accuracy in detecting resection margins of LM with a high versus low risk of recurrence. Furthermore, the use of AI improved the performance of 2/5 pathologists. This automated tool could aid pathologists in the assessment or pre-screening of LM margins.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-024-01532-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical excision with clear histopathological margins is the preferred treatment to prevent progression of lentigo maligna (LM) to invasive melanoma. However, the assessment of resection margins on sun-damaged skin is challenging. We developed a deep learning model for detection of melanocytes in resection margins of LM. In total, 353 whole slide images (WSIs) were included. 295 WSIs were used for training and 58 for validation and testing. The algorithm was trained with 3,973 manual pixel-wise annotations. The AI analyses were compared to those of three blinded dermatopathologists and two pathology residents, who performed their evaluations without AI and AI-assisted. Immunohistochemistry (SOX10) served as the reference standard. We used a dichotomized cutoff for low and high risk of recurrence (≤ 25 melanocytes in an area of 0.5 mm for low risk and > 25 for high risk). The AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 in discriminating margins with low and high recurrence risk. In comparison, the AUC for dermatopathologists ranged from 0.72 to 0.90 and for the residents in pathology, 0.68 to 0.80. Additionally, with aid of the AI model the performance of two pathologists significantly improved. The deep learning showed notable accuracy in detecting resection margins of LM with a high versus low risk of recurrence. Furthermore, the use of AI improved the performance of 2/5 pathologists. This automated tool could aid pathologists in the assessment or pre-screening of LM margins.
利用深度学习模型评估恶性白斑切除边缘的黑素细胞密度
组织病理学边缘清晰的手术切除是防止恶性白斑(LM)发展为浸润性黑色素瘤的首选治疗方法。然而,对晒伤皮肤的切除边缘进行评估具有挑战性。我们开发了一种深度学习模型,用于检测 LM 切除边缘的黑色素细胞。该模型共包含 353 张全切片图像(WSI)。其中 295 张用于训练,58 张用于验证和测试。该算法使用 3,973 个人工像素注释进行训练。人工智能分析结果与三位盲皮肤病理学家和两位病理住院医师的分析结果进行了比较,他们分别在无人工智能和有人工智能辅助的情况下进行了评估。免疫组化(SOX10)作为参考标准。我们采用了低复发风险和高复发风险的二分临界值(在 0.5 毫米的区域内黑色素细胞≤ 25 个为低风险,大于 25 个为高风险)。人工智能模型在区分低复发风险和高复发风险边缘方面的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.84。相比之下,皮肤病理学家的接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.72 至 0.90,病理住院医师的接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.68 至 0.80。此外,在人工智能模型的帮助下,两名病理学家的表现也有了显著提高。深度学习在检测复发风险高与低的 LM 切除边缘方面表现出了显著的准确性。此外,人工智能的使用还提高了五分之二病理学家的工作绩效。这一自动化工具可帮助病理学家评估或预检 LM 边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信