Investigation of the radial uniform and variable inflow profiles to improve production in the perforated horizontal wellbore

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
Hasanain J. Kareem, Hasril Hasini, Mohammed A. Abdulwahid
{"title":"Investigation of the radial uniform and variable inflow profiles to improve production in the perforated horizontal wellbore","authors":"Hasanain J. Kareem, Hasril Hasini, Mohammed A. Abdulwahid","doi":"10.1007/s00231-024-03503-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study delved into the efficacy of enhanced oil production (EOP) within perforated horizontal wellbores across diverse flow profiles. The authors implemented five distinct configurations, encompassing uniform radial air injection (profile 1) and variable radial air injection (profiles 2–5), with a particular emphasis on the concomitant production of liquid and air phases. Additionally, the study examined the frictional behavior along the perforated wellbore. Liquid production was demonstrably amplified throughout the bubble, plug, and slug flow regimes; however, a decline was observed in the stratified, stratified transition, and stratified wave flow regimes. Notably, the liquid product exhibited a direct correlation with both the mixture flow rate and its associated Reynolds number, signifying an increase with holdup and a decrease with void fraction. Conversely, air production displayed a positive association with a higher air flow rate. Overall, profiles 2 and 4 yielded the most favorable production during the bubble, plug, slug, and stratified flow regimes. In contrast, profile 3 emerged as the optimal configuration for the stratified transition and stratified wave flow regimes. The friction factor remained relatively constant with profile 1, experienced a reduction in profile 2, and exhibited an escalation in profile 3. Additionally, it increased in the middle of profile 4 and decreased at the center of the perforated section in profile 5. The friction factor behavior of profile 1 remained stable and smooth due to the invariant air flow rate throughout the perforated section. Conversely, some fluctuation was observed in profile 2 due to the inherent variability of the radial air injection along the perforated section. Importantly, the experimental and numerical results demonstrated satisfactory agreement across all flow patterns, with some minor discrepancies noted in the static pressure drop behavior during the bubble, dispersed bubble, and slug flow regimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12908,"journal":{"name":"Heat and Mass Transfer","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat and Mass Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-024-03503-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delved into the efficacy of enhanced oil production (EOP) within perforated horizontal wellbores across diverse flow profiles. The authors implemented five distinct configurations, encompassing uniform radial air injection (profile 1) and variable radial air injection (profiles 2–5), with a particular emphasis on the concomitant production of liquid and air phases. Additionally, the study examined the frictional behavior along the perforated wellbore. Liquid production was demonstrably amplified throughout the bubble, plug, and slug flow regimes; however, a decline was observed in the stratified, stratified transition, and stratified wave flow regimes. Notably, the liquid product exhibited a direct correlation with both the mixture flow rate and its associated Reynolds number, signifying an increase with holdup and a decrease with void fraction. Conversely, air production displayed a positive association with a higher air flow rate. Overall, profiles 2 and 4 yielded the most favorable production during the bubble, plug, slug, and stratified flow regimes. In contrast, profile 3 emerged as the optimal configuration for the stratified transition and stratified wave flow regimes. The friction factor remained relatively constant with profile 1, experienced a reduction in profile 2, and exhibited an escalation in profile 3. Additionally, it increased in the middle of profile 4 and decreased at the center of the perforated section in profile 5. The friction factor behavior of profile 1 remained stable and smooth due to the invariant air flow rate throughout the perforated section. Conversely, some fluctuation was observed in profile 2 due to the inherent variability of the radial air injection along the perforated section. Importantly, the experimental and numerical results demonstrated satisfactory agreement across all flow patterns, with some minor discrepancies noted in the static pressure drop behavior during the bubble, dispersed bubble, and slug flow regimes.

Abstract Image

研究径向均匀和可变流入剖面,提高穿孔水平井筒的产量
这项研究深入探讨了不同流动剖面的射孔水平井井筒内强化采油(EOP)的功效。作者采用了五种不同的配置,包括均匀径向注气(剖面 1)和可变径向注气(剖面 2-5),特别强调了液相和气相的同时生产。此外,研究还考察了穿孔井筒沿线的摩擦行为。在气泡流、堵塞流和射流的整个过程中,液体产量明显增加;但在分层流、分层过渡流和分层波浪流过程中,液体产量有所下降。值得注意的是,液体产物与混合物流速及其相关的雷诺数都有直接关系,这表明滞留率会增加,而空隙率会降低。相反,空气产生量与较高的空气流速呈正相关。总体而言,在气泡、堵塞、蛞蝓和分层流动状态下,剖面 2 和剖面 4 的产气量最高。相比之下,剖面 3 是分层过渡和分层波浪流状态下的最佳配置。在剖面 1 中,摩擦因数保持相对稳定,在剖面 2 中有所下降,而在剖面 3 中则呈上升趋势。此外,在剖面 4 的中部,摩擦因数有所上升,而在剖面 5 的穿孔部分中心,摩擦因数有所下降。由于整个穿孔段的空气流速不变,剖面 1 的摩擦因数行为保持稳定和平滑。相反,在剖面 2 中,由于沿穿孔段径向注入空气的固有变化,摩擦因数出现了一些波动。重要的是,实验结果和数值结果在所有流动模式下都显示出令人满意的一致性,只是在气泡、分散气泡和蛞蝓流动状态下的静压降行为存在一些微小差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat and Mass Transfer
Heat and Mass Transfer 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: This journal serves the circulation of new developments in the field of basic research of heat and mass transfer phenomena, as well as related material properties and their measurements. Thereby applications to engineering problems are promoted. The journal is the traditional "Wärme- und Stoffübertragung" which was changed to "Heat and Mass Transfer" back in 1995.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信