The Complex Pattern Mismatch Negativity as a Potential Indicator of Psychosis Across all Phases of Illness: A Meta-Analysis.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/15500594241264870
Ashley M Francis, Sydney Slaunwhite-Hay, Kara Dempster, Natalia Jaworska, Philip G Tibbo, Derek J Fisher
{"title":"The Complex Pattern Mismatch Negativity as a Potential Indicator of Psychosis Across all Phases of Illness: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ashley M Francis, Sydney Slaunwhite-Hay, Kara Dempster, Natalia Jaworska, Philip G Tibbo, Derek J Fisher","doi":"10.1177/15500594241264870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, there has been extensive research on the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its promise as a biomarker of illness in people with schizophrenia (SZ). Nevertheless, when attempting to assess the early stages of illness progression, the utility of MMN has been inconsistent. Recently, researchers have been investigating a more advanced MMN paradigm (the complex MMN [cMMN]) which is believed to index higher-order cognitive processing and has been suggested to be a more effective indicator of the early phases of SZ. The cMMN is defined as a paradigm that relies on alterations within a pre-established pattern of stimuli. In this meta-analysis, we investigated cMMN deficits in individuals with SZ, including an analysis involving those in the first 5 years of illness. Our search also included individuals with bipolar disorder who experience psychosis; however, no related papers were found and thus, no findings are reported. Our findings indicate a small/moderate effect (d = 0.47), suggesting that individuals with SZ exhibit reduced cMMN amplitudes compared to individuals without SZ. Interestingly, this effect seems to be more pronounced in individuals within the first 5 years of their illness (d = 0.58), suggesting that cMMN might be a more sensitive biomarker in the early phases of SZ compared to traditional paradigms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241264870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been extensive research on the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its promise as a biomarker of illness in people with schizophrenia (SZ). Nevertheless, when attempting to assess the early stages of illness progression, the utility of MMN has been inconsistent. Recently, researchers have been investigating a more advanced MMN paradigm (the complex MMN [cMMN]) which is believed to index higher-order cognitive processing and has been suggested to be a more effective indicator of the early phases of SZ. The cMMN is defined as a paradigm that relies on alterations within a pre-established pattern of stimuli. In this meta-analysis, we investigated cMMN deficits in individuals with SZ, including an analysis involving those in the first 5 years of illness. Our search also included individuals with bipolar disorder who experience psychosis; however, no related papers were found and thus, no findings are reported. Our findings indicate a small/moderate effect (d = 0.47), suggesting that individuals with SZ exhibit reduced cMMN amplitudes compared to individuals without SZ. Interestingly, this effect seems to be more pronounced in individuals within the first 5 years of their illness (d = 0.58), suggesting that cMMN might be a more sensitive biomarker in the early phases of SZ compared to traditional paradigms.

复杂模式错配负性作为各期精神病的潜在指标:一项元分析
在过去的十年中,有关错配负性(MMN)及其作为精神分裂症(SZ)患者疾病生物标志物的前景已经有了广泛的研究。然而,在尝试评估疾病进展的早期阶段时,MMN 的效用并不一致。最近,研究人员一直在研究一种更先进的MMN范式(复杂MMN [cMMN]),这种范式被认为能反映更高阶的认知处理过程,并被认为是精神分裂症早期阶段更有效的指标。cMMN被定义为一种依赖于改变预先建立的刺激模式的范式。在这项荟萃分析中,我们对 SZ 患者的 cMMN 缺陷进行了调查,其中包括对病程最初 5 年的患者进行的分析。我们的研究还包括患有双相情感障碍并经历过精神病的患者;但是,我们没有找到相关论文,因此没有报告研究结果。我们的研究结果表明,与未患过 SZ 的人相比,SZ 患者的 cMMN 振幅较小/中等(d = 0.47)。有趣的是,这种效应似乎在病程最初 5 年内更为明显(d = 0.58),这表明与传统范式相比,cMMN 可能是 SZ 早期阶段更为敏感的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信