Effortful retrieval of semantic memories induces forgetting of related negative and neutral episodic memories

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jamie Greer , Amna Ali , Camille Laksman , Ringo Huang , Mason McClay , David Clewett
{"title":"Effortful retrieval of semantic memories induces forgetting of related negative and neutral episodic memories","authors":"Jamie Greer ,&nbsp;Amna Ali ,&nbsp;Camille Laksman ,&nbsp;Ringo Huang ,&nbsp;Mason McClay ,&nbsp;David Clewett","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) experiments show that the act of retrieving some recently encoded items from a given conceptual category leads to greater forgetting of competing items from that same category. However, RIF studies using emotional stimuli have produced mixed results, perhaps due to the reinstatement of arousal or negative affect during retrieval practice. To induce forgetting of negative episodic memories more indirectly, we examined if retrieving neutral semantic memories leads to RIF of related negative memories. In two experiments, participants studied eight categorized lists comprised of an equal number of negative and neutral words (Experiment 1) or neutral words preceded by neutral or negative images (Experiment 2). To avoid re-exposing individuals to negative material during retrieval practice, participants then performed a semantic memory retrieval task in which they generated (i.e., completed word-stems for) new neutral words from half of the studied categories. We found that semantic retrieval, or word generation, induced forgetting of recently studied words irrespective of their emotional valence or original emotional context. Additionally, across both experiments, less successful word generation was associated with stronger RIF effects. In Experiment 2, the magnitude of RIF was also correlated with higher subjective ratings of retrieval effort during word generation. Together, these results suggest that even when retrieving neutral semantic memories, effortful retrieval may enhance inhibitory processes that lead to forgetting of both neutral and negative episodic memories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002772400194X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) experiments show that the act of retrieving some recently encoded items from a given conceptual category leads to greater forgetting of competing items from that same category. However, RIF studies using emotional stimuli have produced mixed results, perhaps due to the reinstatement of arousal or negative affect during retrieval practice. To induce forgetting of negative episodic memories more indirectly, we examined if retrieving neutral semantic memories leads to RIF of related negative memories. In two experiments, participants studied eight categorized lists comprised of an equal number of negative and neutral words (Experiment 1) or neutral words preceded by neutral or negative images (Experiment 2). To avoid re-exposing individuals to negative material during retrieval practice, participants then performed a semantic memory retrieval task in which they generated (i.e., completed word-stems for) new neutral words from half of the studied categories. We found that semantic retrieval, or word generation, induced forgetting of recently studied words irrespective of their emotional valence or original emotional context. Additionally, across both experiments, less successful word generation was associated with stronger RIF effects. In Experiment 2, the magnitude of RIF was also correlated with higher subjective ratings of retrieval effort during word generation. Together, these results suggest that even when retrieving neutral semantic memories, effortful retrieval may enhance inhibitory processes that lead to forgetting of both neutral and negative episodic memories.

语义记忆的努力检索会诱发相关的负面和中性外显记忆的遗忘。
检索诱发遗忘(RIF)实验表明,检索特定概念类别中最近编码的一些项目会导致对同一类别中竞争项目的更大遗忘。然而,使用情绪刺激进行的 RIF 研究结果不一,这可能是由于在检索练习过程中唤醒或负面情绪的恢复。为了更间接地诱导负面记忆的遗忘,我们研究了检索中性语义记忆是否会导致相关负面记忆的 RIF。在两个实验中,参与者研究了八个分类列表,其中包括相同数量的负面和中性词(实验 1)或中性词前有中性或负面图像(实验 2)。为了避免在检索练习中让个体再次接触负面材料,参与者随后进行了一项语义记忆检索任务,在这项任务中,他们从一半的研究类别中生成(即完成单词系统)新的中性词。我们发现,语义检索或单词生成会诱发对最近学习过的单词的遗忘,而与这些单词的情感价位或原始情感语境无关。此外,在这两项实验中,较不成功的单词生成与较强的 RIF 效应相关。在实验 2 中,RIF 的大小还与单词生成过程中检索努力程度的主观评价相关。总之,这些结果表明,即使在检索中性语义记忆时,费力的检索也可能会增强抑制过程,从而导致中性和负性外显记忆的遗忘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信