Implementing a real-time patient experience feedback in inpatient rehabilitation: Process evaluation informed by the normalisation process theory

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jan Struhar, Taylor Walters, Kristen Gracz, Mansi Sheth, Andrea Fernandez, Courtney Lopez, Tiago S. Jesus
{"title":"Implementing a real-time patient experience feedback in inpatient rehabilitation: Process evaluation informed by the normalisation process theory","authors":"Jan Struhar,&nbsp;Taylor Walters,&nbsp;Kristen Gracz,&nbsp;Mansi Sheth,&nbsp;Andrea Fernandez,&nbsp;Courtney Lopez,&nbsp;Tiago S. Jesus","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Near real-time patient experience feedback (NRTPEF) can enable a patient-centric, immediate service recovery but has not been widely used in inpatient rehabilitation. We 1) assess the utility, feasibility, and acceptability of implementing a new NRTPEF, perceived by patients and providers; and 2) understand how the NRTPEF became embedded into routine provider practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Mixed methods process evaluation of the 8-month implementation of an innovative NRTPEF in an inpatient rehabilitation unit, using interviews and focus groups with all the service-unit leaders and interviews with a randomised sample of patients. Beyond descriptive statistics and content analysis, the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) informed a framework analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients and service-unit leaders perceived high utility in the NRTPEF (median: 9 for both; 0–10 scale) and qualitative comments emphasised the value of providing/obtaining timely feedback. The system was found feasible and acceptable for patients (median: 9.5), but with an improvement margin for providers (median: 7.3). Suggestions include strengthening the data-relay format. Even in the pilot form, providers found the NRTPEF became embedded into practice (median 10; average: 8.6). The analysis based on the NPT shows how providers saw differential value, engaged with, and used the patient feedback into reconfigured practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An innovative NRTPEF was found useful, feasible and acceptable, but with refinement opportunities before scale-up.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":"39 6","pages":"1737-1754"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3832","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3832","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Near real-time patient experience feedback (NRTPEF) can enable a patient-centric, immediate service recovery but has not been widely used in inpatient rehabilitation. We 1) assess the utility, feasibility, and acceptability of implementing a new NRTPEF, perceived by patients and providers; and 2) understand how the NRTPEF became embedded into routine provider practices.

Materials and Methods

Mixed methods process evaluation of the 8-month implementation of an innovative NRTPEF in an inpatient rehabilitation unit, using interviews and focus groups with all the service-unit leaders and interviews with a randomised sample of patients. Beyond descriptive statistics and content analysis, the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) informed a framework analysis.

Results

Patients and service-unit leaders perceived high utility in the NRTPEF (median: 9 for both; 0–10 scale) and qualitative comments emphasised the value of providing/obtaining timely feedback. The system was found feasible and acceptable for patients (median: 9.5), but with an improvement margin for providers (median: 7.3). Suggestions include strengthening the data-relay format. Even in the pilot form, providers found the NRTPEF became embedded into practice (median 10; average: 8.6). The analysis based on the NPT shows how providers saw differential value, engaged with, and used the patient feedback into reconfigured practices.

Conclusion

An innovative NRTPEF was found useful, feasible and acceptable, but with refinement opportunities before scale-up.

在住院康复治疗中实施实时患者体验反馈:基于正常化过程理论的过程评估。
目的:近实时患者体验反馈(NRTPEF)可以实现以患者为中心的即时服务恢复,但尚未在住院康复中广泛使用。我们:1)评估患者和医疗服务提供者对实施新的 NRTPEF 的实用性、可行性和可接受性的看法;2)了解 NRTPEF 如何嵌入到医疗服务提供者的常规实践中:采用混合方法,对一个住院康复病房为期 8 个月的创新性 NRTPEF 实施过程进行评估,对所有服务单位负责人进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,并对随机抽样的患者进行访谈。除了描述性统计和内容分析外,规范化过程理论(NPT)还为框架分析提供了依据:结果:患者和服务单位负责人都认为 NRTPEF 具有很高的实用性(两者的中位数均为 9;0-10 分制),定性评论强调了提供/获得及时反馈的价值。患者认为该系统可行且可接受(中位数:9.5),但医疗服务提供者认为该系统有待改进(中位数:7.3)。建议包括加强数据中继格式。即使是在试点阶段,医疗服务提供者也发现 NRTPEF 已融入到实践中(中位数:10;平均值:8.6)。基于 NPT 的分析表明了医疗服务提供者如何看到不同的价值、参与并将患者反馈意见用于重新配置的实践中:结论:创新的 NRTPEF 被认为是有用、可行和可接受的,但在推广之前仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信