Program Evaluation of Pharmacist-Performed Medication Adherence Assessments in Candidates for Living Donor Kidney Transplant.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Linh Nguyen, Abigail Forte, Gregory Malat, Xinqi Liu, Jose Rivera, Cara Christopher, Rahul Samudralwar, Tolulope Ilori, Maxwell Norris, Melissa Bleicher, Robert R Redfield, Robert Weinrieb, Roy D Bloom, Ty B Dunn, Jennifer Trofe-Clark
{"title":"Program Evaluation of Pharmacist-Performed Medication Adherence Assessments in Candidates for Living Donor Kidney Transplant.","authors":"Linh Nguyen, Abigail Forte, Gregory Malat, Xinqi Liu, Jose Rivera, Cara Christopher, Rahul Samudralwar, Tolulope Ilori, Maxwell Norris, Melissa Bleicher, Robert R Redfield, Robert Weinrieb, Roy D Bloom, Ty B Dunn, Jennifer Trofe-Clark","doi":"10.1177/15269248241268681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Medication education and adherence assessments are integral to kidney transplant success. This program evaluation aimed to describe candidate-reported findings using a standardized medication adherence assessment in candidates undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation. <b>Design:</b> This was a single-center retrospective description of medication adherence on adult HIV-negative living-donor candidates from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2018 who had ≥6 months post-operative follow-up. Medication adherence assessments were performed by a pharmacist at the pre-operative visit within 2 weeks prior to transplant. Candidates were considered to (a) have adherence concerns if they reported missed/late medications within 2 weeks of assessment or ever stopped a medication without medical advice and (b) considered using adherence strategies if they reported active use of pill box, method to keep track of refills/auto-refill use, medication list, or medication reminder(s). Missed medication data were collected at 3- and 6-months posttransplant. <b>Results:</b> Among 181 candidates included, 81 (45%) had adherence concerns and 169 (93%) reported using adherence strategies. There were no significant differences with adherence concerns by age ≤ 29 years, sex, race, prior transplant/dialysis, or less than a high school education. More candidates with greater than a high school education used adherence strategies (96% vs 86%, <i>P</i> = .002). Too few candidates had documentation on missing medications at 3 and 6 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> Over 40% of candidates reported characteristics concerning medication nonadherence despite over 90% reporting adherence strategies used. Medication adherence assessments can assist with identification of medication nonadherence and education individualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248241268681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medication education and adherence assessments are integral to kidney transplant success. This program evaluation aimed to describe candidate-reported findings using a standardized medication adherence assessment in candidates undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation. Design: This was a single-center retrospective description of medication adherence on adult HIV-negative living-donor candidates from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2018 who had ≥6 months post-operative follow-up. Medication adherence assessments were performed by a pharmacist at the pre-operative visit within 2 weeks prior to transplant. Candidates were considered to (a) have adherence concerns if they reported missed/late medications within 2 weeks of assessment or ever stopped a medication without medical advice and (b) considered using adherence strategies if they reported active use of pill box, method to keep track of refills/auto-refill use, medication list, or medication reminder(s). Missed medication data were collected at 3- and 6-months posttransplant. Results: Among 181 candidates included, 81 (45%) had adherence concerns and 169 (93%) reported using adherence strategies. There were no significant differences with adherence concerns by age ≤ 29 years, sex, race, prior transplant/dialysis, or less than a high school education. More candidates with greater than a high school education used adherence strategies (96% vs 86%, P = .002). Too few candidates had documentation on missing medications at 3 and 6 months. Conclusions: Over 40% of candidates reported characteristics concerning medication nonadherence despite over 90% reporting adherence strategies used. Medication adherence assessments can assist with identification of medication nonadherence and education individualization.

由药剂师对活体肾移植候选者进行用药依从性评估的项目评估。
介绍:用药教育和依从性评估是肾移植成功不可或缺的因素。本项目评估旨在通过对接受活体供肾移植的候选者进行标准化用药依从性评估,描述候选者报告的结果。设计:这是对 2018 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 1 日期间术后随访≥6 个月的 HIV 阴性成人活体供体候选者用药依从性的单中心回顾性描述。药剂师在移植前 2 周内的术前访视中进行了用药依从性评估。如果候选者(a)报告在评估后 2 周内漏服/迟服药物,或曾在没有医嘱的情况下停药,则被视为存在用药依从性问题;(b)如果候选者报告积极使用药盒、跟踪续药/自动续药使用情况的方法、药物清单或用药提醒,则被视为使用了用药依从性策略。在移植后 3 个月和 6 个月收集漏服药物数据。结果:在纳入的 181 名候选者中,81 人(45%)有坚持用药的顾虑,169 人(93%)报告使用了坚持用药策略。不同年龄段(29 岁以下)、性别、种族、移植前/透析经历或高中以下学历的患者在坚持治疗方面没有明显差异。更多高中以上学历的候选者使用了依从性策略(96% vs 86%,P = .002)。在 3 个月和 6 个月时有缺药记录的候选人太少。结论:尽管超过 90% 的候选者报告使用了遵医嘱策略,但仍有超过 40% 的候选者报告了不遵医嘱用药的特征。用药依从性评估有助于识别用药不依从情况和教育个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信