Reduction of Overactive Bladder Medications in Spinal Cord Injury With Self-Administered Neuromodulation: A Randomized Trial.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004189
Argyrios Stampas, Radha Korupolu, Kyung Hyun Lee, Betsy Salazar, Rose Khavari
{"title":"Reduction of Overactive Bladder Medications in Spinal Cord Injury With Self-Administered Neuromodulation: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Argyrios Stampas, Radha Korupolu, Kyung Hyun Lee, Betsy Salazar, Rose Khavari","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our goal was to evaluate if self-administered bladder neuromodulation with transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation could safely replace overactive bladder medications in people with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a 3-month, randomized, investigator-blinded, tibial nerve stimulation vs sham-control trial in adults with spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder performing intermittent catheterization and taking overactive bladder medications. The primary outcome was a reduction in bladder medications while maintaining stable bladder symptoms and quality of life based on pre/post Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, respectively. Secondary outcomes included changes in pre/post cystometrogram, 2-day voiding diaries, and an anticholinergic medication side effect survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty people consented to the study, with 42 completing the trial. No dropouts were due to stimulation issues. All baseline demographics and surveys were comparable at baseline. Cystometrogram parameters were also comparable at baseline, except the stimulation group had a higher proportion of loss of bladder compliance compared to the control group. At the end of the trial, a significantly greater percentage of the tibial nerve stimulation group was able to reduce medications (95% vs 68%), by a 26.2% difference in medication reduction (95% CI 1.17%-51.2%). Function and quality of life surveys and cystometrograms at the end of the trial were alike between groups. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation satisfaction surveys and adherence to protocol were high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In people with chronic spinal cord injury performing intermittent catheterization, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation can be an option to reduce or replace overactive bladder medications.</p><p><p>Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT03458871.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"800-810"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to evaluate if self-administered bladder neuromodulation with transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation could safely replace overactive bladder medications in people with spinal cord injury.

Materials and methods: We performed a 3-month, randomized, investigator-blinded, tibial nerve stimulation vs sham-control trial in adults with spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder performing intermittent catheterization and taking overactive bladder medications. The primary outcome was a reduction in bladder medications while maintaining stable bladder symptoms and quality of life based on pre/post Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, respectively. Secondary outcomes included changes in pre/post cystometrogram, 2-day voiding diaries, and an anticholinergic medication side effect survey.

Results: Fifty people consented to the study, with 42 completing the trial. No dropouts were due to stimulation issues. All baseline demographics and surveys were comparable at baseline. Cystometrogram parameters were also comparable at baseline, except the stimulation group had a higher proportion of loss of bladder compliance compared to the control group. At the end of the trial, a significantly greater percentage of the tibial nerve stimulation group was able to reduce medications (95% vs 68%), by a 26.2% difference in medication reduction (95% CI 1.17%-51.2%). Function and quality of life surveys and cystometrograms at the end of the trial were alike between groups. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation satisfaction surveys and adherence to protocol were high.

Conclusions: In people with chronic spinal cord injury performing intermittent catheterization, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation can be an option to reduce or replace overactive bladder medications.

Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT03458871.

通过自控神经调节减少脊髓损伤患者的膀胱过度活动药物;一项随机试验。
目的:评估经皮胫神经刺激自控膀胱神经调节是否能安全地取代脊髓损伤患者的膀胱过度活动药物:我们对脊髓损伤和神经源性膀胱的成人患者进行了为期 3 个月的胫神经刺激与假对照试验,试验采用随机、研究者盲法,患者需进行间歇性导尿并服用膀胱过度活动药物。主要结果是减少膀胱药物用量,同时保持稳定的膀胱症状和生活质量,分别基于前后神经源性膀胱症状评分和尿失禁-生活质量问卷。次要结果包括前后膀胱造影的变化、2 天排尿日记和抗胆碱能药物副作用调查:结果:50 人同意参加研究,其中 42 人完成了试验。没有人因刺激问题而退出。所有基线人口统计学数据和调查在基线时均具有可比性。膀胱造影参数在基线时也具有可比性,但与对照组相比,刺激组膀胱顺应性丧失的比例更高。试验结束时,胫神经刺激组能够减少用药的比例明显高于对照组(95% 对 68%),减少用药的比例相差 26.2%(95% 置信区间为 1.17%-51.2%)。试验结束时的功能和生活质量调查以及膀胱造影在各组之间无差异。经皮胫神经刺激满意度调查和方案坚持率都很高:对于间歇性导尿的慢性脊髓损伤患者来说,经皮胫神经刺激疗法是减少或替代膀胱过度活动药物的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信