Anne L Bennett, Michael E Nissan, Amor Niksic, Berkay Basagaoglu, James Thornton
{"title":"Aesthetic Auricle Reconstruction with the Dieffenbach Flap: A Retrospective Case Review.","authors":"Anne L Bennett, Michael E Nissan, Amor Niksic, Berkay Basagaoglu, James Thornton","doi":"10.1055/a-2378-8298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Dieffenbach flap is often used for post-Mohs reconstruction of auricle defects, effectively restoring the auricle rim. However, its impact on auricle projection and length after division and inset is not well-documented. This study evaluates auricle projection and length following defect repair with the Dieffenbach flap, comparing results to the nonoperative ear. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent a Dieffenbach flap repair surgery at a single institution from 2016 to 2023. Auricle projection and length of the reconstructed ear were measured within the first month following division and inset of the flap and compared with the contralateral ear. A subset of patients had additional measurements > 1 month following division and inset, and these measurements were compared with the contralateral ear. Our study included 23 patients with an average age 67.4 years and 78.3% male. Within 1 month following division and inset, the Dieffenbach flap resulted in a significant decrease in auricle projection (16.5 vs. 18.6 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and length (67.0 vs. 69.7 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared with the contralateral ear. Subsequent follow-up showed no significant differences in projection (18.5 vs. 18.5 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.98) or length (68.0 vs. 68.7 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.54). Following division and inset of the Dieffenbach flap, auricle projection and length experience initial reduction but subsequently self-correct to match the contralateral ear.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2378-8298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Dieffenbach flap is often used for post-Mohs reconstruction of auricle defects, effectively restoring the auricle rim. However, its impact on auricle projection and length after division and inset is not well-documented. This study evaluates auricle projection and length following defect repair with the Dieffenbach flap, comparing results to the nonoperative ear. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent a Dieffenbach flap repair surgery at a single institution from 2016 to 2023. Auricle projection and length of the reconstructed ear were measured within the first month following division and inset of the flap and compared with the contralateral ear. A subset of patients had additional measurements > 1 month following division and inset, and these measurements were compared with the contralateral ear. Our study included 23 patients with an average age 67.4 years and 78.3% male. Within 1 month following division and inset, the Dieffenbach flap resulted in a significant decrease in auricle projection (16.5 vs. 18.6 mm, p < 0.05) and length (67.0 vs. 69.7 mm, p < 0.05) compared with the contralateral ear. Subsequent follow-up showed no significant differences in projection (18.5 vs. 18.5 mm, p = 0.98) or length (68.0 vs. 68.7 mm, p = 0.54). Following division and inset of the Dieffenbach flap, auricle projection and length experience initial reduction but subsequently self-correct to match the contralateral ear.
期刊介绍:
Facial Plastic Surgery is a journal that publishes topic-specific issues covering areas of aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery as it relates to the head, neck, and face. The journal''s scope includes issues devoted to scar revision, periorbital and mid-face rejuvenation, facial trauma, facial implants, rhinoplasty, neck reconstruction, cleft palate, face lifts, as well as various other emerging minimally invasive procedures.
Authors provide a global perspective on each topic, critically evaluate recent works in the field, and apply it to clinical practice.