Enhanced audiovisual associative pair learning in migraine without aura in adult patients: An unexpected finding.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kálmán Tót, Gábor Braunitzer, Noémi Harcsa-Pintér, Ádám Kiss, Balázs Bodosi, János Tajti, Anett Csáti, Gabriella Eördegh, Attila Nagy
{"title":"Enhanced audiovisual associative pair learning in migraine without aura in adult patients: An unexpected finding.","authors":"Kálmán Tót, Gábor Braunitzer, Noémi Harcsa-Pintér, Ádám Kiss, Balázs Bodosi, János Tajti, Anett Csáti, Gabriella Eördegh, Attila Nagy","doi":"10.1177/03331024241258722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Altered sensory processing in migraine has been demonstrated by several studies in unimodal, and especially visual, tasks. While there is some limited evidence hinting at potential alterations in multisensory processing among migraine sufferers, this aspect remains relatively unexplored. This study investigated the interictal cognitive performance of migraine patients without aura compared to matched controls, focusing on associative learning, recall, and transfer abilities through the Sound-Face Test, an audiovisual test based on the principles of the Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The performance of 42 volunteering migraine patients was compared to the data of 42 matched controls, selected from a database of healthy volunteers who had taken the test earlier. The study aimed to compare the groups' performance in learning, recall, and the ability to transfer learned associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Migraine patients demonstrated significantly superior associative learning as compared to controls, requiring fewer trials, and making fewer errors during the acquisition phase. However, no significant differences were observed in retrieval error ratios, generalization error ratios, or reaction times between migraine patients and controls in later stages of the test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our study support those of previous investigations, which concluded that multisensory processing exhibits a unique pattern in migraine. The specific finding that associative audiovisual pair learning is more effective in adult migraine patients than in matched controls is unexpected. If the phenomenon is not an artifact, it may be assumed to be a combined result of the hypersensitivity present in migraine and the sensory threshold-lowering effect of multisensory integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"44 7","pages":"3331024241258722"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241258722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Altered sensory processing in migraine has been demonstrated by several studies in unimodal, and especially visual, tasks. While there is some limited evidence hinting at potential alterations in multisensory processing among migraine sufferers, this aspect remains relatively unexplored. This study investigated the interictal cognitive performance of migraine patients without aura compared to matched controls, focusing on associative learning, recall, and transfer abilities through the Sound-Face Test, an audiovisual test based on the principles of the Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test.

Materials and methods: The performance of 42 volunteering migraine patients was compared to the data of 42 matched controls, selected from a database of healthy volunteers who had taken the test earlier. The study aimed to compare the groups' performance in learning, recall, and the ability to transfer learned associations.

Results: Migraine patients demonstrated significantly superior associative learning as compared to controls, requiring fewer trials, and making fewer errors during the acquisition phase. However, no significant differences were observed in retrieval error ratios, generalization error ratios, or reaction times between migraine patients and controls in later stages of the test.

Conclusion: The results of our study support those of previous investigations, which concluded that multisensory processing exhibits a unique pattern in migraine. The specific finding that associative audiovisual pair learning is more effective in adult migraine patients than in matched controls is unexpected. If the phenomenon is not an artifact, it may be assumed to be a combined result of the hypersensitivity present in migraine and the sensory threshold-lowering effect of multisensory integration.

成年无先兆偏头痛患者的视听联想对学习能力增强:意想不到的发现
背景:多项关于单模态(尤其是视觉)任务的研究表明,偏头痛患者的感觉处理能力发生了改变。虽然有一些有限的证据暗示偏头痛患者的多感官处理能力可能会发生改变,但这方面的研究仍相对较少。本研究调查了无先兆偏头痛患者发作间期的认知表现,并与匹配的对照组进行了比较,重点是通过声-面测试(一种基于罗格斯后天等效性测试原理的视听测试)进行联想学习、回忆和迁移能力的测试:将 42 名自愿参加测试的偏头痛患者的表现与 42 名匹配对照组的数据进行比较,后者是从之前参加过该测试的健康志愿者数据库中挑选出来的。研究旨在比较两组患者在学习、回忆和迁移所学联想能力方面的表现:结果:与对照组相比,偏头痛患者的联想学习能力明显更强,所需的试验次数更少,在习得阶段出现的错误也更少。然而,在测试的后期阶段,偏头痛患者与对照组在检索错误率、泛化错误率或反应时间方面没有明显差异:我们的研究结果支持之前的研究,这些研究认为偏头痛患者的多感官处理表现出一种独特的模式。与匹配的对照组相比,成年偏头痛患者的视听配对联想学习更为有效,这一具体发现出乎意料。如果这一现象不是伪造的,那么可以认为它是偏头痛患者的超敏反应和多感官整合的感觉阈值降低效应共同作用的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信