Risk Assessment and Control of N-Nitrosamines in Antibody–Drug Conjugates: Current Industry Practices

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Paul G. Bulger, Michael T. Jones, J. Gair Ford, Kate Schrier, Kevin P. Cole, Frank Bernardoni, Olivier Dirat, Qunying Zhang, Osama Chahrour, Joy Miller, Llorente Bonaga, Andrew T. Parsons, Lan Yang
{"title":"Risk Assessment and Control of N-Nitrosamines in Antibody–Drug Conjugates: Current Industry Practices","authors":"Paul G. Bulger, Michael T. Jones, J. Gair Ford, Kate Schrier, Kevin P. Cole, Frank Bernardoni, Olivier Dirat, Qunying Zhang, Osama Chahrour, Joy Miller, Llorente Bonaga, Andrew T. Parsons, Lan Yang","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and <i>N</i>-nitrosamines are two topics that have seen a surge of interest in recent years. ADCs are increasingly prevalent as oncology therapeutics in clinical development and on the market. Concerns about the potential presence of <i>N</i>-nitrosamines in pharmaceutical products have led to increased regulatory scrutiny and implementation of robust control strategies by the industry. This article, the first in a two-part series, provides visibility into current industry practices for risk assessment and control of <i>N</i>-nitrosamines in ADCs with results and analysis from a benchmarking survey of member companies of the IQ Consortium. Items covered include assessment methodology, identification and characterization of risks, control limits at the drug-linker intermediate and drug substance, and specific factors related to the ADC modality that can be considered. Simpler <i>N</i>-nitrosamines (e.g., NDMA) and more complex <i>N</i>-nitrosamine drug-linker-related impurities (NDLRIs) are discussed. Areas where there are greater or lesser degrees of consistency across companies are highlighted. The second paper builds on these survey results by presenting a comprehensive set of recommendations for the risk evaluation and control strategy of <i>N</i>-nitrosamine impurities in drug-linkers and ADCs. Taken together, these papers provide a perspective on the current state and encourage further development of scientifically sound approaches in this field.","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and N-nitrosamines are two topics that have seen a surge of interest in recent years. ADCs are increasingly prevalent as oncology therapeutics in clinical development and on the market. Concerns about the potential presence of N-nitrosamines in pharmaceutical products have led to increased regulatory scrutiny and implementation of robust control strategies by the industry. This article, the first in a two-part series, provides visibility into current industry practices for risk assessment and control of N-nitrosamines in ADCs with results and analysis from a benchmarking survey of member companies of the IQ Consortium. Items covered include assessment methodology, identification and characterization of risks, control limits at the drug-linker intermediate and drug substance, and specific factors related to the ADC modality that can be considered. Simpler N-nitrosamines (e.g., NDMA) and more complex N-nitrosamine drug-linker-related impurities (NDLRIs) are discussed. Areas where there are greater or lesser degrees of consistency across companies are highlighted. The second paper builds on these survey results by presenting a comprehensive set of recommendations for the risk evaluation and control strategy of N-nitrosamine impurities in drug-linkers and ADCs. Taken together, these papers provide a perspective on the current state and encourage further development of scientifically sound approaches in this field.

Abstract Image

抗体药物共轭物中 N-亚硝胺的风险评估和控制:当前行业实践
抗体药物共轭物 (ADC) 和 N-亚硝胺是近年来备受关注的两个话题。作为肿瘤治疗药物,ADC 在临床开发和市场上越来越普遍。人们对医药产品中可能存在亚硝胺的担忧已导致监管部门加强审查,业界也开始实施强有力的控制策略。本文是两部分系列文章中的第一篇,通过对 IQ Consortium 成员公司进行基准调查的结果和分析,介绍了当前行业在 ADC 中亚硝胺风险评估和控制方面的做法。涵盖的项目包括评估方法、风险识别和定性、药物连接剂中间体和药物物质的控制限值,以及可考虑的与 ADC 方式相关的特定因素。讨论了较简单的 N-亚硝胺(如 NDMA)和较复杂的 N-亚硝胺药物连接剂相关杂质 (NDLRI)。重点介绍了各公司在哪些方面存在或多或少的一致性。第二篇论文以这些调查结果为基础,就药物连接剂和 ADC 中的 N-亚硝胺杂质的风险评估和控制策略提出了一整套建议。总之,这些论文提供了对当前状况的看法,并鼓励在这一领域进一步开发科学合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
251
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信