Internet-based survey on diagnosis and treatment recommendations for medial shoulder syndrome and instability in dogs.

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Patrick J Rocheleau, David Dycus, Peter J Lotsikas, Alexandria Robson
{"title":"Internet-based survey on diagnosis and treatment recommendations for medial shoulder syndrome and instability in dogs.","authors":"Patrick J Rocheleau, David Dycus, Peter J Lotsikas, Alexandria Robson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to document perceived frequency of medial shoulder syndrome and instability (MSS/MSI) among dogs, and preferred diagnostic and treatment options related to the condition, among American or European Colleges of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS/ECVS) diplomates, American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation (ACVSMR) diplomates, and dual diplomates of ACVS/ECVS and ACVSMR (double-Boarded diplomates).</p><p><strong>Procedure: </strong>An invitation to complete an online survey was sent to diplomates <i>via</i> email listservs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The known response rate for the survey was 15.8% (160 of 1014 email addresses). There was a difference (<i>P</i> = 0.006) among groups in number of cases of MSS/MSI seen, with ACVS/ECVS diplomates and double-Boarded diplomates seeing 0 to 5 cases per year (80.7 and 72.7%, respectively) and ACVSMR diplomates (32% of total respondents) seeing 11 to 26+ cases annually. The majority of all respondents (56.4%) felt the likely cause of MSS/MSI to be chronic/repetitive strain. Diagnostically, most respondents (78%) relied on shoulder abduction angles; however, most felt it was a questionable or somewhat accurate diagnostic test. The ACVSMR diplomates (88%) relied on musculoskeletal ultrasound as their preferred diagnostic modality, compared to only 35% of ACVS/ECVS diplomates and 45% of double-Boarded diplomates. Preferred treatment was rehabilitation with surgery for unresponsive cases, as reported by 86.9% of all respondents. Preferred surgical treatment was prosthetic ligament reconstruction (62.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the low known response rate of this survey, there were significant differences among specialties regarding frequency of MSS/MSI cases seen per year and preferred diagnostic modalities. However, there were no differences among specialties regarding the suspected underlying causes of MSS/MSI and initial treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9429,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to document perceived frequency of medial shoulder syndrome and instability (MSS/MSI) among dogs, and preferred diagnostic and treatment options related to the condition, among American or European Colleges of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS/ECVS) diplomates, American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation (ACVSMR) diplomates, and dual diplomates of ACVS/ECVS and ACVSMR (double-Boarded diplomates).

Procedure: An invitation to complete an online survey was sent to diplomates via email listservs.

Results: The known response rate for the survey was 15.8% (160 of 1014 email addresses). There was a difference (P = 0.006) among groups in number of cases of MSS/MSI seen, with ACVS/ECVS diplomates and double-Boarded diplomates seeing 0 to 5 cases per year (80.7 and 72.7%, respectively) and ACVSMR diplomates (32% of total respondents) seeing 11 to 26+ cases annually. The majority of all respondents (56.4%) felt the likely cause of MSS/MSI to be chronic/repetitive strain. Diagnostically, most respondents (78%) relied on shoulder abduction angles; however, most felt it was a questionable or somewhat accurate diagnostic test. The ACVSMR diplomates (88%) relied on musculoskeletal ultrasound as their preferred diagnostic modality, compared to only 35% of ACVS/ECVS diplomates and 45% of double-Boarded diplomates. Preferred treatment was rehabilitation with surgery for unresponsive cases, as reported by 86.9% of all respondents. Preferred surgical treatment was prosthetic ligament reconstruction (62.7%).

Conclusion: Despite the low known response rate of this survey, there were significant differences among specialties regarding frequency of MSS/MSI cases seen per year and preferred diagnostic modalities. However, there were no differences among specialties regarding the suspected underlying causes of MSS/MSI and initial treatment strategies.

关于犬内侧肩关节综合征和不稳定的诊断和治疗建议的网络调查。
研究目的本研究旨在记录美国兽医外科学院(ACVS/ECVS)或欧洲兽医外科学院(ACVS/ECVS)认证医师、美国兽医运动医学与康复学院(ACVSMR)认证医师以及ACVS/ECVS和ACVSMR双认证医师(双认证医师)对犬内侧肩部综合征和不稳定(MSS/MSI)的认知频率,以及与该病症相关的首选诊断和治疗方案:程序: 通过电子邮件列表向文凭获得者发出完成在线调查的邀请:已知调查回复率为 15.8%(1014 个电子邮件地址中的 160 个)。各组之间接诊的 MSS/MSI 病例数存在差异(P = 0.006),其中 ACVS/ECVS 文凭人员和双认证文凭人员每年接诊的病例数为 0 至 5 例(分别为 80.7% 和 72.7%),而 ACVSMR 文凭人员(占受访者总数的 32%)每年接诊的病例数为 11 至 26 例以上。大多数受访者(56.4%)认为,MSS/MSI 的病因可能是慢性/重复性劳损。在诊断方面,大多数受访者(78%)依赖于肩关节外展角度;然而,大多数人认为这是一种值得怀疑或有一定准确性的诊断测试。ACVSMR 文凭获得者(88%)首选的诊断方法是肌肉骨骼超声波,而 ACVS/ECVS 文凭获得者中仅有 35%,双认证文凭获得者中仅有 45%。86.9%的受访者表示,对于无反应的病例,首选的治疗方法是康复治疗和手术治疗。首选的手术治疗方法是人工韧带重建(62.7%):结论:尽管本次调查的已知回复率较低,但各专科在每年接诊的 MSS/MSI 病例频率和首选诊断方式方面存在显著差异。然而,各专科在 MSS/MSI 的疑似潜在病因和初始治疗策略方面并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Veterinary Journal (CVJ) provides a forum for the discussion of all matters relevant to the veterinary profession. The mission of the Journal is to educate by informing readers of progress in clinical veterinary medicine, clinical veterinary research, and related fields of endeavor. The key objective of The CVJ is to promote the art and science of veterinary medicine and the betterment of animal health. A report suggesting that animals have been unnecessarily subjected to adverse, stressful, or harsh conditions or treatments will not be processed for publication. Experimental studies using animals will only be considered for publication if the studies have been approved by an institutional animal care committee, or equivalent, and the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, or equivalent, have been followed by the author(s).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信