Recent racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with rectal cancer.

IF 3.8 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2024-06-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-24-1
Lu Li, Zhenpeng Xu, Guanghua Chen, Leichang Zhang, Zhihua Lu, Chen Chen, Yugen Chen
{"title":"Recent racial/ethnic disparities in cancer-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with rectal cancer.","authors":"Lu Li, Zhenpeng Xu, Guanghua Chen, Leichang Zhang, Zhihua Lu, Chen Chen, Yugen Chen","doi":"10.21037/tgh-24-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American patients frequently receive nonstandard treatment and demonstrate poorer overall survival (OS) outcomes compared to White patients. Our objective was to analysis whether racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer-specific mortality remain after accounting for clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care-related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2011 and 2020 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer-specific mortality was computed. Sub-distribution hazard ratios (sdHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for rectal cancer-specific mortality associated with race/ethnicity were estimated using Fine and Gray model with stepwise adjustments for clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors related to access-to-care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 54,370 patients, non-Hispanic (NH) Black individuals exhibited the highest cumulative incidence of rectal cancer-specific mortality (39%), followed by American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) (35%), Hispanics (32%), NH-White (31%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) (30%). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, NH-Black patients had a 28% increased risk of rectal cancer mortality (sdHR, 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20-1.35) compared to NH-White patients. In contrast, mortality disparities between Hispanic-White, AI/AN-White, and API-White groups were not significant. The Black-White mortality differences persisted even after adjustments for treatment and access-to-care-related factors. In stratified analyses, among patients with a median household income below $59,999, AI/AN patients showed higher mortality than NH-Whites when adjusted for clinical characteristics (sdHR, 1.32; 95% CI: 1.03-1.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer-specific mortality were largely attributable to differences in clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors related to access-to-care. These findings emphasize the critical need for equitable healthcare to effectively address and reduce the significant racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94362,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":"9 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-24-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: African American patients frequently receive nonstandard treatment and demonstrate poorer overall survival (OS) outcomes compared to White patients. Our objective was to analysis whether racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer-specific mortality remain after accounting for clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care-related factors.

Methods: Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2011 and 2020 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer-specific mortality was computed. Sub-distribution hazard ratios (sdHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for rectal cancer-specific mortality associated with race/ethnicity were estimated using Fine and Gray model with stepwise adjustments for clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors related to access-to-care.

Results: Among 54,370 patients, non-Hispanic (NH) Black individuals exhibited the highest cumulative incidence of rectal cancer-specific mortality (39%), followed by American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) (35%), Hispanics (32%), NH-White (31%), and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) (30%). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, NH-Black patients had a 28% increased risk of rectal cancer mortality (sdHR, 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20-1.35) compared to NH-White patients. In contrast, mortality disparities between Hispanic-White, AI/AN-White, and API-White groups were not significant. The Black-White mortality differences persisted even after adjustments for treatment and access-to-care-related factors. In stratified analyses, among patients with a median household income below $59,999, AI/AN patients showed higher mortality than NH-Whites when adjusted for clinical characteristics (sdHR, 1.32; 95% CI: 1.03-1.70).

Conclusions: Overall, the racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer-specific mortality were largely attributable to differences in clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and factors related to access-to-care. These findings emphasize the critical need for equitable healthcare to effectively address and reduce the significant racial/ethnic disparities in rectal cancer outcomes.

直肠癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的最新种族/族裔差异。
背景:非裔美国人患者经常接受非标准治疗,与白人患者相比,他们的总生存率(OS)较低。我们的目的是分析在考虑临床特征、治疗和获得护理相关因素后,直肠癌特异性死亡率的种族/民族差异是否仍然存在:方法:我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库对 2011 年至 2020 年间确诊为直肠癌的患者进行了鉴定。计算直肠癌特异性死亡率的累积发病率。使用 Fine and Gray 模型估算了与种族/民族相关的直肠癌特异性死亡率的子分布危险比 (sdHRs) 和 95% 置信区间 (CIs),并逐步调整了临床特征、治疗方式和获得护理的相关因素:在54,370名患者中,非西班牙裔(NH)黑人的直肠癌特异性死亡率累积发生率最高(39%),其次是美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)(35%)、西班牙裔(32%)、NH-白人(31%)和亚洲/太平洋岛民(API)(30%)。调整临床特征后,与新罕布什尔-白人患者相比,新罕布什尔-黑人患者的直肠癌死亡风险增加了 28%(sdHR,1.28;95% CI:1.20-1.35)。相比之下,西班牙裔白人、亚裔美国人/印第安人-白人和亚裔美国人-白人群体之间的死亡率差异并不显著。即使对治疗和获得护理的相关因素进行调整后,黑人与白人的死亡率差异依然存在。在分层分析中,在家庭收入中位数低于 59999 美元的患者中,根据临床特征进行调整后,亚裔美国人/印第安人患者的死亡率高于新罕布什尔白人(sdHR,1.32;95% CI:1.03-1.70):总体而言,直肠癌特异性死亡率的种族/民族差异主要归因于临床特征、治疗方式和获得护理相关因素的差异。这些发现强调了公平医疗保健的重要性,以有效解决和减少直肠癌治疗结果中的种族/民族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信