Biliary stenosis after liver transplant is not associated with cytomegalovirus infection.

IF 3.8 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-23-110
Juliano Félix Castro, Ana Cláudia Souza, Antônio Márcio de Faria Andrade, Henrique Peragallos Corrêa, Bruno da Silva Athanasio, Cristiano Xavier Lima
{"title":"Biliary stenosis after liver transplant is not associated with cytomegalovirus infection.","authors":"Juliano Félix Castro, Ana Cláudia Souza, Antônio Márcio de Faria Andrade, Henrique Peragallos Corrêa, Bruno da Silva Athanasio, Cristiano Xavier Lima","doi":"10.21037/tgh-23-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment for end-stage liver disease; however, biliary complications (BCs) still pose a significant challenge. Among the post-transplant BC, strictures and biliary fistulas are the most common. Biliary strictures are classified as anastomotic and non-anastomotic. Some previous studies suggest an association between post-transplant biliary strictures and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. In this study, we aimed to identify whether there is an association between CMV infection and biliary strictures in patients undergoing LT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 175 patients aged ≥18 years undergoing LT at Felicio Rocho Hospital between 2011 and 2017 was conducted. All included patients received grafts perfused with Institut Georges Lopez-1 (IGL-1) solution from brain-dead donors, survived post-transplantation for more than 120 days, and had a minimum follow-up of 12 months after LT. The diagnosis of CMV was made by antigenemia and biliary strictures by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the recipients was 54 years. Postoperative BCs occurred in 12% of transplants. The most common BC was stricture (9.1%), with a predominance of anastomotic strictures (AS) over non-AS (NAS) (87.5% <i>vs.</i> 12.5%, respectively). CMV infection was confirmed in 22.9% of patients. In the univariate analysis, post-transplant CMV infection correlated with the development of BCs (P=0.01), as well as biliary strictures (P=0.008). In the multivariate analysis, however, only model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) >21 was a risk factor for the development of BCs in general (P=0.02) and biliary strictures (P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMV infection was not an independent risk factor for the development of non-anastomotic post-transplant biliary strictures in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94362,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":"9 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-23-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment for end-stage liver disease; however, biliary complications (BCs) still pose a significant challenge. Among the post-transplant BC, strictures and biliary fistulas are the most common. Biliary strictures are classified as anastomotic and non-anastomotic. Some previous studies suggest an association between post-transplant biliary strictures and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. In this study, we aimed to identify whether there is an association between CMV infection and biliary strictures in patients undergoing LT.

Methods: A retrospective study of 175 patients aged ≥18 years undergoing LT at Felicio Rocho Hospital between 2011 and 2017 was conducted. All included patients received grafts perfused with Institut Georges Lopez-1 (IGL-1) solution from brain-dead donors, survived post-transplantation for more than 120 days, and had a minimum follow-up of 12 months after LT. The diagnosis of CMV was made by antigenemia and biliary strictures by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

Results: The average age of the recipients was 54 years. Postoperative BCs occurred in 12% of transplants. The most common BC was stricture (9.1%), with a predominance of anastomotic strictures (AS) over non-AS (NAS) (87.5% vs. 12.5%, respectively). CMV infection was confirmed in 22.9% of patients. In the univariate analysis, post-transplant CMV infection correlated with the development of BCs (P=0.01), as well as biliary strictures (P=0.008). In the multivariate analysis, however, only model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) >21 was a risk factor for the development of BCs in general (P=0.02) and biliary strictures (P=0.01).

Conclusions: CMV infection was not an independent risk factor for the development of non-anastomotic post-transplant biliary strictures in this study.

肝移植后胆道狭窄与巨细胞病毒感染无关。
背景:肝移植(LT)是治疗终末期肝病的最佳方法,但胆道并发症(BC)仍是一项重大挑战。在移植后胆道并发症中,胆道狭窄和胆道瘘最为常见。胆道狭窄分为吻合口狭窄和非吻合口狭窄。之前的一些研究表明,移植后胆道狭窄与巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染有关。在本研究中,我们旨在确定接受LT手术的患者中CMV感染与胆道狭窄之间是否存在关联:我们对2011年至2017年期间在Felicio Rocho医院接受LT手术的175名年龄≥18岁的患者进行了回顾性研究。所有纳入研究的患者均接受了由脑死亡供体提供的乔治-洛佩兹研究所-1(IGL-1)溶液灌注的移植物,移植后存活超过120天,LT后至少随访12个月。CMV的诊断是通过抗原血症和胆道狭窄的磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)进行的:结果:受试者的平均年龄为 54 岁。结果:受者平均年龄为 54 岁,12% 的移植者在术后出现胆汁淤积。最常见的BC是狭窄(9.1%),吻合口狭窄(AS)比非吻合口狭窄(NAS)多(分别为87.5%和12.5%)。22.9%的患者确诊感染了 CMV。在单变量分析中,移植后CMV感染与BCs(P=0.01)和胆道狭窄(P=0.008)的发生相关。然而,在多变量分析中,只有终末期肝病模型(MELD)>21才是发生一般BC(P=0.02)和胆道狭窄(P=0.01)的风险因素:结论:在本研究中,CMV感染不是发生非吻合口移植后胆道狭窄的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信