Zhen Li, M M Yun Yang, Mbbs Meng Yang, M M Xin Tong
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Dental Implant Fractures: A Case Series and Analysis of Influencing Factors.","authors":"Zhen Li, M M Yun Yang, Mbbs Meng Yang, M M Xin Tong","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe and analyse patients with dental implant fracture and explore the factors influencing the fracture with the aim of providing reference for physicians' clinical work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 19 patients with dental implant fracture who visited the Department of Implantology of our hospital between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively observed and analysed, and the fracture's influencing factors (e.g. the fracted implant site, implant diameter and connection mode, upper prosthetic method and fracture site) were analysed and investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fractured implants comprised 12 Straumann implants (5 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 7 atop the central screws), 5 Bego implants (4 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 1 atop the central screw), 3 Lifecore implants fractured atop the central screws and 1 Anthogyr implant fractured atop the central screw. Of the 19 patients, 6 had anterior dental implant fracture, and 13 had posterior dental implant fracture (21 fractured implants in total). Maxillary anterior dental implant fracture was observed in 6 patients (8 implants), maxillary posterior implant fracture was observed in 3 patients (3 implants), and mandibular posterior dental implant fracture was observed in 10 patients (10 implants).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A good implant system design, appropriate implant diameter and reasonable upper prosthetic method are key to maintaining long-term stability of a dental implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To observe and analyse patients with dental implant fracture and explore the factors influencing the fracture with the aim of providing reference for physicians' clinical work.
Methods: The clinical data of 19 patients with dental implant fracture who visited the Department of Implantology of our hospital between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively observed and analysed, and the fracture's influencing factors (e.g. the fracted implant site, implant diameter and connection mode, upper prosthetic method and fracture site) were analysed and investigated.
Results: The fractured implants comprised 12 Straumann implants (5 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 7 atop the central screws), 5 Bego implants (4 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 1 atop the central screw), 3 Lifecore implants fractured atop the central screws and 1 Anthogyr implant fractured atop the central screw. Of the 19 patients, 6 had anterior dental implant fracture, and 13 had posterior dental implant fracture (21 fractured implants in total). Maxillary anterior dental implant fracture was observed in 6 patients (8 implants), maxillary posterior implant fracture was observed in 3 patients (3 implants), and mandibular posterior dental implant fracture was observed in 10 patients (10 implants).
Conclusions: A good implant system design, appropriate implant diameter and reasonable upper prosthetic method are key to maintaining long-term stability of a dental implant.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
