Neurocognitive and social cognitive correlates of social exclusion in psychotic disorders: a 20-year follow-up cohort study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Victor Peralta, Ana M Sánchez-Torres, Gustavo Gil-Berrozpe, Elena García de Jalón, Lucía Moreno-Izco, David Peralta, Lucía Janda, Manuel J Cuesta
{"title":"Neurocognitive and social cognitive correlates of social exclusion in psychotic disorders: a 20-year follow-up cohort study.","authors":"Victor Peralta, Ana M Sánchez-Torres, Gustavo Gil-Berrozpe, Elena García de Jalón, Lucía Moreno-Izco, David Peralta, Lucía Janda, Manuel J Cuesta","doi":"10.1007/s00127-024-02742-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about the relationship between social exclusion and cognitive impairment in psychosis. We conducted a long-term cohort study of first-episode psychosis to examine the association between comprehensive measures of cognitive impairment and social exclusion assessed at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 173 subjects with first-episode psychosis were assessed after a 20-year follow-up for 7 cognitive domains and 12 social exclusion indicators. Associations between sets of variables were modeled using multivariate regression, where social exclusion indicators were the dependent variables, cognitive domains were the independent variables, and age, gender, and duration of follow-up were covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total scores on the measures of cognition and social exclusion were strongly associated (β =  - .469, ∆R<sup>2</sup> = 0.215). Participants with high social exclusion were 4.24 times more likely to have cognitive impairment than those with low social exclusion. Verbal learning was the cognitive function most related to social exclusion domains, and legal capacity was the exclusion domain that showed the strongest relationships with individual cognitive tests. Neurocognition uniquely contributed to housing, work activity, income, and educational attainment, whereas social cognition uniquely contributed to neighborhood deprivation, family and social contacts, and discrimination/stigma. Neurocognition explained more unique variance (11.5%) in social exclusion than social cognition (5.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The domains of cognitive impairment were strongly and differentially related to those of social exclusion. Given that such an association pattern is likely bidirectional, a combined approach, both social and cognitive, is of paramount relevance in addressing the social exclusion experienced by individuals with psychotic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"413-426"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02742-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about the relationship between social exclusion and cognitive impairment in psychosis. We conducted a long-term cohort study of first-episode psychosis to examine the association between comprehensive measures of cognitive impairment and social exclusion assessed at follow-up.

Methods: A total of 173 subjects with first-episode psychosis were assessed after a 20-year follow-up for 7 cognitive domains and 12 social exclusion indicators. Associations between sets of variables were modeled using multivariate regression, where social exclusion indicators were the dependent variables, cognitive domains were the independent variables, and age, gender, and duration of follow-up were covariates.

Results: The total scores on the measures of cognition and social exclusion were strongly associated (β =  - .469, ∆R2 = 0.215). Participants with high social exclusion were 4.24 times more likely to have cognitive impairment than those with low social exclusion. Verbal learning was the cognitive function most related to social exclusion domains, and legal capacity was the exclusion domain that showed the strongest relationships with individual cognitive tests. Neurocognition uniquely contributed to housing, work activity, income, and educational attainment, whereas social cognition uniquely contributed to neighborhood deprivation, family and social contacts, and discrimination/stigma. Neurocognition explained more unique variance (11.5%) in social exclusion than social cognition (5.5%).

Conclusion: The domains of cognitive impairment were strongly and differentially related to those of social exclusion. Given that such an association pattern is likely bidirectional, a combined approach, both social and cognitive, is of paramount relevance in addressing the social exclusion experienced by individuals with psychotic disorders.

Abstract Image

精神病患者社会排斥的神经认知和社会认知相关性:一项为期 20 年的跟踪队列研究。
目的:人们对精神病患者的社会排斥与认知障碍之间的关系知之甚少。我们对首次发病的精神病患者进行了一项长期队列研究,以考察认知障碍的综合测量与随访时评估的社会排斥之间的关系:我们对 173 名首次发病的精神病患者进行了为期 20 年的随访,评估了他们的 7 个认知领域和 12 个社会排斥指标。采用多元回归法建立了各组变量之间的关联模型,其中社会排斥指标为因变量,认知领域为自变量,年龄、性别和随访时间为协变量:认知测量的总分与社会排斥密切相关(β = - .469,∆R2 = 0.215)。社会排斥程度高的参与者出现认知障碍的可能性是社会排斥程度低的参与者的 4.24 倍。语言学习是与社会排斥领域关系最密切的认知功能,而法律能力则是与单项认知测试关系最密切的排斥领域。神经认知对住房、工作活动、收入和受教育程度有独特的贡献,而社会认知对邻里贫困、家庭和社会接触以及歧视/羞辱有独特的贡献。在社会排斥方面,神经认知比社会认知(5.5%)能解释更多的独特变异(11.5%):结论:认知障碍的各个领域与社会排斥的各个领域之间存在着强烈的差异。鉴于这种关联模式很可能是双向的,因此在解决精神障碍患者所经历的社会排斥问题时,社会和认知两方面的综合方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信