AI-based Cleft Lip and Palate Surgical Information is Preferred by Both Plastic Surgeons and Patients in a Blind Comparison.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1177/10556656241266368
Alexander Z Fazilat, Charlotte E Berry, Andrew Churukian, Christopher Lavin, Lionel Kameni, Camille Brenac, Silvio Podda, Karl Bruckman, Hermann P Lorenz, Rohit K Khosla, Derrick C Wan
{"title":"AI-based Cleft Lip and Palate Surgical Information is Preferred by Both Plastic Surgeons and Patients in a Blind Comparison.","authors":"Alexander Z Fazilat, Charlotte E Berry, Andrew Churukian, Christopher Lavin, Lionel Kameni, Camille Brenac, Silvio Podda, Karl Bruckman, Hermann P Lorenz, Rohit K Khosla, Derrick C Wan","doi":"10.1177/10556656241266368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has expanded in recent years, and these tools such as ChatGPT to generate patient-facing information have garnered particular interest. Online cleft lip and palate (CL/P) surgical information supplied by academic/professional (A/P) sources was therefore evaluated against ChatGPT regarding accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity.Methods11 plastic and reconstructive surgeons and 29 non-medical individuals blindly compared responses written by ChatGPT or A/P sources to 30 frequently asked CL/P surgery questions. Surgeons indicated preference, determined accuracy, and scored comprehensiveness and clarity. Non-medical individuals indicated preference. Calculations of readability scores were determined using seven readability formulas. Statistical analysis of CL/P surgical online information was performed using paired t-tests.ResultsSurgeons, 60.88% of the time, blindly preferred material generated by ChatGPT over A/P sources. Additionally, surgeons consistently indicated that ChatGPT-generated material was more comprehensive and had greater clarity. No significant difference was found between ChatGPT and resources provided by professional organizations in terms of accuracy. Among individuals with no medical background, ChatGPT-generated materials were preferred 60.46% of the time. For materials from both ChatGPT and A/P sources, readability scores surpassed advised levels for patient proficiency across seven readability formulas.ConclusionAs the prominence of ChatGPT-based language tools rises in the healthcare space, potential applications of the tools should be assessed by experts against existing high-quality sources. Our results indicate that ChatGPT is capable of producing high-quality material in terms of accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity preferred by both plastic surgeons and individuals with no medical background.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1542-1548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241266368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has expanded in recent years, and these tools such as ChatGPT to generate patient-facing information have garnered particular interest. Online cleft lip and palate (CL/P) surgical information supplied by academic/professional (A/P) sources was therefore evaluated against ChatGPT regarding accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity.Methods11 plastic and reconstructive surgeons and 29 non-medical individuals blindly compared responses written by ChatGPT or A/P sources to 30 frequently asked CL/P surgery questions. Surgeons indicated preference, determined accuracy, and scored comprehensiveness and clarity. Non-medical individuals indicated preference. Calculations of readability scores were determined using seven readability formulas. Statistical analysis of CL/P surgical online information was performed using paired t-tests.ResultsSurgeons, 60.88% of the time, blindly preferred material generated by ChatGPT over A/P sources. Additionally, surgeons consistently indicated that ChatGPT-generated material was more comprehensive and had greater clarity. No significant difference was found between ChatGPT and resources provided by professional organizations in terms of accuracy. Among individuals with no medical background, ChatGPT-generated materials were preferred 60.46% of the time. For materials from both ChatGPT and A/P sources, readability scores surpassed advised levels for patient proficiency across seven readability formulas.ConclusionAs the prominence of ChatGPT-based language tools rises in the healthcare space, potential applications of the tools should be assessed by experts against existing high-quality sources. Our results indicate that ChatGPT is capable of producing high-quality material in terms of accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity preferred by both plastic surgeons and individuals with no medical background.

基于人工智能的唇腭裂手术信息在盲比中受到整形外科医生和患者的青睐。
简介近年来,人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的应用不断扩大,ChatGPT 等用于生成面向患者的信息的工具尤其受到关注。因此,我们对学术/专业(A/P)来源提供的在线唇腭裂(CL/P)手术信息与 ChatGPT 的准确性、全面性和清晰度进行了对比评估。方法:11 名整形外科医生和 29 名非医务人员对 ChatGPT 或 A/P 来源针对 30 个常见唇腭裂手术问题所做的回答进行了盲比。外科医生表示了偏好,确定了准确性,并对全面性和清晰度进行了评分。非医务人员表示偏好。使用七个可读性公式计算可读性得分。使用配对 t 检验对 CL/P 手术在线信息进行统计分析:结果:外科医生有 60.88% 的时间盲目偏好 ChatGPT 生成的资料,而不是 A/P 资料来源。此外,外科医生一致表示 ChatGPT 生成的资料更全面、更清晰。在准确性方面,ChatGPT 和专业组织提供的资源没有明显差异。在没有医学背景的个人中,60.46% 的人首选 ChatGPT 生成的资料。对于 ChatGPT 和 A/P 来源的材料,在七个可读性公式中,可读性得分都超过了患者熟练程度的建议水平:结论:随着基于 ChatGPT 的语言工具在医疗保健领域的重要性日益凸显,应由专家根据现有的高质量来源对这些工具的潜在应用进行评估。我们的研究结果表明,无论是整形外科医生还是没有医学背景的个人,ChatGPT 都能在准确性、全面性和清晰度方面提供高质量的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信