Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241265013
Min Jee Kim, Ye-Jee Kim, Daehyun Jeong, Seonok Kim, Seokchan Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Wook Jo
{"title":"Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study.","authors":"Min Jee Kim, Ye-Jee Kim, Daehyun Jeong, Seonok Kim, Seokchan Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Wook Jo","doi":"10.1177/17562848241265013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents <i>versus</i> non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (<i>n</i> = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241265013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.

Objectives: We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.

Design: This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.

Methods: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.

Results: In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.

Conclusion: In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

接受非抗-TNF 生物制剂或抗-TNF-α 制剂治疗的韩国炎症性肠病患者发生严重感染和结核病的比较风险:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
背景:在韩国人群中,尚未根据抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α药物与非抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂(维妥珠单抗/奥司替尼)的使用情况同时评估炎症性肠病(IBD)患者发生严重感染和活动性肺结核的风险:我们比较了接受非抗-TNF生物制剂(维妥珠单抗/奥司替尼)或抗-TNF-α制剂治疗的韩国IBD患者发生严重感染和活动性肺结核的风险:方法:回顾2007年1月至2021年2月期间健康保险审查和评估服务的索赔数据(占韩国人口的97%),纳入2017年至2020年期间开始使用维多珠单抗/奥斯特库单抗或抗-TNF-α治疗的成人IBD患者(n = 6123)。分析了随访期间需要住院/急诊就诊的严重感染或活动性肺结核风险的组间差异:在平均随访1.55±1.05年和0.84±0.69年期间接受抗TNF-α药物或维多珠单抗/奥司替尼治疗的患者中,严重感染发生率分别为9.43/100人年和6.87/100人年。多变量分析显示,使用维多珠单抗/奥司替尼或抗肿瘤坏死因子-α治疗的严重感染风险在组间无明显差异;与抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物相比,使用维多珠单抗/奥司替尼的调整后相对风险为0.81(95%置信区间为0.46-1.44,P = 0.478)。在接受抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物和维多珠单抗/奥司替尼治疗的患者中,活动性肺结核的发病率分别为每100人年0.87例和0.37例。与抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物相比,维多珠单抗/奥司替尼的相对风险为0.31(95%置信区间为0.07-1.26,P = 0.101)。在比较维多珠单抗和乌斯特库单抗与抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物的子集分析中,也观察到类似的结果:结论:在韩国IBD患者中,与抗肿瘤坏死因子α药物相比,非抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂(维多利珠单抗/乌斯特库单抗)发生严重感染或活动性肺结核的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信