Feasibility and Safety Study of the Use of a New Robot (Maestro™) for Laparoscopic Surgery.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07409-9
Guy-Bernard Cadière, Jacques Himpens, Mathilde Poras, Nicolas Boyer, Benjamin Cadière
{"title":"Feasibility and Safety Study of the Use of a New Robot (Maestro™) for Laparoscopic Surgery.","authors":"Guy-Bernard Cadière, Jacques Himpens, Mathilde Poras, Nicolas Boyer, Benjamin Cadière","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07409-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In laparoscopic surgery, telerobotic systems such as Da Vinci™ were developed, among other things, to give back exposure and vision control to the operating surgeon. However, new limitations such as the separation of the operating surgeon from the operating table, cost, and size were unveiled. A new device, Maestro™, appears promising in addressing these limitations. The current work evaluates the feasibility, safety, and surgeon satisfaction with the assistance provided by the Maestro System.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-consecutive patients who were candidates for laparoscopic digestive surgery were enrolled in a descriptive prospective, monocentric study. Case selection was solely based on the availability of the device, but not on the patient's characteristics. Surgery was performed by a leading surgeon with the help of one less experienced surgeon. Feasibility was defined by the maintenance of the initial surgical plan. Safety was assessed by the absence of serious adverse events related to the device and surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 50 procedures were completed without conversion in laparotomy and without adjustment of the surgical team. Four complications were recorded during the study; however, none related to the use of the Maestro System. In 92% of the cases, the surgeon was satisfied with the assistance provided by the Maestro System.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In standard elective digestive procedures by laparoscopy, the use of the Maestro System is feasible and safe. It is beneficial to the surgeon and operative room organization by limiting the size of the surgical team.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07409-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In laparoscopic surgery, telerobotic systems such as Da Vinci™ were developed, among other things, to give back exposure and vision control to the operating surgeon. However, new limitations such as the separation of the operating surgeon from the operating table, cost, and size were unveiled. A new device, Maestro™, appears promising in addressing these limitations. The current work evaluates the feasibility, safety, and surgeon satisfaction with the assistance provided by the Maestro System.

Methods: Non-consecutive patients who were candidates for laparoscopic digestive surgery were enrolled in a descriptive prospective, monocentric study. Case selection was solely based on the availability of the device, but not on the patient's characteristics. Surgery was performed by a leading surgeon with the help of one less experienced surgeon. Feasibility was defined by the maintenance of the initial surgical plan. Safety was assessed by the absence of serious adverse events related to the device and surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire following the intervention.

Results: All 50 procedures were completed without conversion in laparotomy and without adjustment of the surgical team. Four complications were recorded during the study; however, none related to the use of the Maestro System. In 92% of the cases, the surgeon was satisfied with the assistance provided by the Maestro System.

Conclusions: In standard elective digestive procedures by laparoscopy, the use of the Maestro System is feasible and safe. It is beneficial to the surgeon and operative room organization by limiting the size of the surgical team.

Abstract Image

使用新型机器人 (Maestro™) 进行腹腔镜手术的可行性和安全性研究。
背景:在腹腔镜手术中,达芬奇™等远程机器人系统的开发,主要是为了让手术外科医生重新获得视野和视觉控制权。然而,手术外科医生与手术台的分离、成本和尺寸等新的限制也随之出现。一种名为 Maestro™ 的新设备似乎有望解决这些限制。目前的研究评估了 Maestro 系统提供的辅助的可行性、安全性和外科医生的满意度:方法:在一项描述性前瞻性单中心研究中招募了非连续的腹腔镜消化手术候选患者。病例的选择完全基于设备的可用性,而非患者的特征。手术由一名经验丰富的外科医生主刀,另一名经验不足的外科医生协助。手术的可行性是指能否维持最初的手术计划。安全性的评估标准是没有发生与设备相关的严重不良事件,外科医生的满意度则通过干预后的问卷调查来评估:结果:所有 50 例手术均已完成,未进行开腹手术,也未对手术团队进行调整。研究期间共记录了四例并发症,但均与 Maestro 系统的使用无关。在92%的病例中,外科医生对Maestro系统提供的帮助表示满意:结论:在标准的腹腔镜择期消化手术中,使用 Maestro 系统是可行且安全的。结论:在通过腹腔镜进行的标准择期消化手术中,使用 Maestro 系统是可行和安全的,它限制了手术团队的规模,有利于外科医生和手术室的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信