Blast-related mild TBI: LIMBIC-CENC focused review with implications commentary.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Austin R Miller, Sarah L Martindale, Jared A Rowland, Samuel Walton, Tomer Talmy, William C Walker
{"title":"Blast-related mild TBI: LIMBIC-CENC focused review with implications commentary.","authors":"Austin R Miller, Sarah L Martindale, Jared A Rowland, Samuel Walton, Tomer Talmy, William C Walker","doi":"10.3233/NRE-230268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant factor for the high prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among U.S. service members is their exposure to explosive munitions leading to blast-related TBI. Our understanding of the specific clinical effects of mild TBI having a component of blast mechanism remains limited compared to pure blunt mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this review is to provide a synopsis of clinical research findings on the long-term effects of blast-related mild TBI derived to date from the Long-Term Impact of Military-Relevant Brain Injury Consortium - Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (LIMBIC-CENC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publications on blast-related mild TBI from LIMBIC-CENC and the LIMBIC-CENC prospective longitudinal study (PLS) cohort were reviewed and their findings summarized. Findings from the broader literature on blast-related mild TBI that evaluate similar outcomes are additionally reviewed for a perspective on the state of the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most consistent and compelling evidence for long-term effects of blast-related TBI is for poorer psychological health, greater healthcare utilization and disability levels, neuroimaging impacts on brain structure and function, and greater headache impact on daily life. To date, evidence for chronic cognitive performance deficits from blast-related mild TBI is limited, but futher research including crucial longitudinal data is needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Commentary is provided on: how LIMBIC-CENC findings assimilate with the broader literature; ongoing research gaps alongside future research needs and priorities; how the scientific community can utilize the LIMBIC-CENC database for independent or collaborative research; and how the evidence from the clinical research should be assimilated into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-230268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant factor for the high prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among U.S. service members is their exposure to explosive munitions leading to blast-related TBI. Our understanding of the specific clinical effects of mild TBI having a component of blast mechanism remains limited compared to pure blunt mechanisms.

Objective: The purpose of this review is to provide a synopsis of clinical research findings on the long-term effects of blast-related mild TBI derived to date from the Long-Term Impact of Military-Relevant Brain Injury Consortium - Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (LIMBIC-CENC).

Methods: Publications on blast-related mild TBI from LIMBIC-CENC and the LIMBIC-CENC prospective longitudinal study (PLS) cohort were reviewed and their findings summarized. Findings from the broader literature on blast-related mild TBI that evaluate similar outcomes are additionally reviewed for a perspective on the state of the literature.

Results: The most consistent and compelling evidence for long-term effects of blast-related TBI is for poorer psychological health, greater healthcare utilization and disability levels, neuroimaging impacts on brain structure and function, and greater headache impact on daily life. To date, evidence for chronic cognitive performance deficits from blast-related mild TBI is limited, but futher research including crucial longitudinal data is needed.

Conclusion: Commentary is provided on: how LIMBIC-CENC findings assimilate with the broader literature; ongoing research gaps alongside future research needs and priorities; how the scientific community can utilize the LIMBIC-CENC database for independent or collaborative research; and how the evidence from the clinical research should be assimilated into clinical practice.

与爆炸有关的轻度创伤性脑损伤:LIMBIC-CENC重点回顾及影响评论。
背景:美国现役军人中创伤性脑损伤(TBI)发病率高的一个重要因素是他们暴露于爆炸性弹药,导致与爆炸有关的 TBI。与纯粹的钝性机制相比,我们对含有爆炸机制成分的轻度 TBI 具体临床影响的了解仍然有限:本综述旨在概述迄今为止军事相关脑损伤长期影响联合会--神经创伤慢性影响联合会(LIMBIC-CENC)关于爆炸相关轻度创伤性脑损伤长期影响的临床研究成果:方法:对 LIMBIC-CENC 和 LIMBIC-CENC 前瞻性纵向研究 (PLS) 队列中与爆炸相关的轻度创伤性脑损伤的文献进行了回顾,并对其研究结果进行了总结。此外,还对更广泛的文献中与爆炸相关的轻度创伤性脑损伤的研究结果进行了回顾,以了解文献的现状:关于爆炸相关创伤性脑损伤的长期影响,最一致、最有说服力的证据是心理健康较差、医疗保健使用率和残疾程度较高、神经影像学对大脑结构和功能的影响以及头痛对日常生活的影响较大。迄今为止,与爆炸相关的轻度创伤性脑损伤造成的慢性认知功能障碍的证据还很有限,但还需要包括重要纵向数据在内的更多研究:本文就以下方面进行了评论:LIMBIC-CENC 的研究结果如何与更广泛的文献相融合;当前的研究差距以及未来的研究需求和重点;科学界如何利用 LIMBIC-CENC 数据库开展独立或合作研究;以及临床研究的证据应如何融入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信