The role of a dedicated transition process from pediatric to adult interdisciplinary care for persons with spina bifida.

Abstract

Objective: Interdisciplinary care and pediatric to adult transitional programs have consistently shown medical and social value for individuals with complex medical conditions such as spina bifida (SB). Such interdisciplinary clinics are common in pediatrics but are rarely offered for adults. This survey-based study reports information related to transition, daily pain burden, and satisfaction with care delivery in an adult SB clinic.

Methods: A 23-question survey that was based on empirical observations from the adult SB clinic was formulated, IRB approved, and distributed to adult patients. Many respondents had previously received care at the institution's pediatric SB clinic and completed transition to the adult program. Responses were de-identified, categorized, stored in a secure database, and statistically analyzed using SPSS.

Results: Of 245 patients approached, 116 (47%) surveys were completed and analyzed. Those who had a direct transition (defined as a less than 24-month gap in care) from the pediatric to the adult clinic comprised 44% (n = 51) of responders. The alternative group of 56% (n = 65) had a longer gap, disorganized or absent transition, or had pediatric care elsewhere. The study population had an average age of 36 years, had mostly received childhood care at the authors' institution, regardless of whether they made a direct transition or had a gap in care (68%), and held the diagnosis of open myelomeningocele (78%). Overall satisfaction with the clinic experience was high (mean score 9.04 on a 10-point subjective scale). Differences regarding independence in activities of daily living based on transition status were not significant, but on multivariate analysis, those who reported independence in activities of daily living had an almost 4-fold higher odds of daily pain (p = 0.024; OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.19-12.5). The most frequently identified areas for improvement included improved access to care and pain control.

Conclusions: Pediatric transitional processes and interdisciplinary clinics may contribute to improved patient-perceived outcomes and satisfaction with their SB care in comprehensive settings. Further elucidation of barriers to pain control is warranted, in addition to ways in which comprehensive and longitudinal care can improve them.