{"title":"Determinants and inequities in healthy working life expectancy in China.","authors":"Chenshuang Li, Lingling Wang, Lieyun Ding, Ying Zhou","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03184-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many countries are raising the pension age to mitigate the challenges of population aging, but such a solution may ignore the disparities in health and working conditions across populations. Using large-scale longitudinal data from China, this study provides estimates of healthy working life expectancy (HWLE), defined as the average number of years expected to be spent healthy and in work from age 50 years, and highlights substantial inequities in HWLE by gender, socioeconomic status and geographical region. The HWLE from age 50 years was, on average, 6.87 (95% confidence interval: 6.70 to 7.04) years in China. Hypertension was the leading chronic condition for people working unhealthily (5.67 years for men and 4.85 years for women), and arthritis contributed the largest differences in unhealthy working years across people by occupation (agricultural laborer versus enterprise employee, 3.28 years). Moreover, adopting healthy lifestyles was associated with gains in HWLE (2.13 years for men and 1.61 years for women). Our findings suggest that increasing the pension age through a 'one-size-fits-all' approach may not effectively meet the goal of extending working lives. Inclusive initiatives aimed at targeted populations to promote health or work conditions and to facilitate the pension system will be essential to improve HWLE by reducing inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03184-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many countries are raising the pension age to mitigate the challenges of population aging, but such a solution may ignore the disparities in health and working conditions across populations. Using large-scale longitudinal data from China, this study provides estimates of healthy working life expectancy (HWLE), defined as the average number of years expected to be spent healthy and in work from age 50 years, and highlights substantial inequities in HWLE by gender, socioeconomic status and geographical region. The HWLE from age 50 years was, on average, 6.87 (95% confidence interval: 6.70 to 7.04) years in China. Hypertension was the leading chronic condition for people working unhealthily (5.67 years for men and 4.85 years for women), and arthritis contributed the largest differences in unhealthy working years across people by occupation (agricultural laborer versus enterprise employee, 3.28 years). Moreover, adopting healthy lifestyles was associated with gains in HWLE (2.13 years for men and 1.61 years for women). Our findings suggest that increasing the pension age through a 'one-size-fits-all' approach may not effectively meet the goal of extending working lives. Inclusive initiatives aimed at targeted populations to promote health or work conditions and to facilitate the pension system will be essential to improve HWLE by reducing inequities.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.