Effect of Early Levodopa Treatment on Mortality in People with Parkinson's Disease.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amir H Talebi, Sirwan K L Darweesh, Bas R Bloem, Ioan G Bucur, Tom Heskes
{"title":"Effect of Early Levodopa Treatment on Mortality in People with Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"Amir H Talebi, Sirwan K L Darweesh, Bas R Bloem, Ioan G Bucur, Tom Heskes","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ideal timing for initiating levodopa in newly diagnosed people with Parkinson's disease (PD) is uncertain due to limited data on the long-term effects of levodopa.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to investigate whether early levodopa initiation postpones mortality (primary outcome), the requirement of device-aided therapies, and the incidence of PD-related complications, such as fall-induced injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using nationwide claims data from Dutch hospitals (2012-2020), we grouped newly diagnosed PD individuals as \"early initiators\" (initiating levodopa within 2 years of diagnosis) or \"nonearly initiators.\" We used the national death registry to assess mortality and health-care claims to assess PD-related complications and device-aided therapies. We used marginal structural models to compare mortality and device-aided therapy rates between groups, and a Poisson regression model to compare PD-related complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 29,943 newly diagnosed PD individuals (mean age at diagnosis: 71.6, 38.5% female), there were 24,847 early and 5096 nonearly levodopa initiators. Over a median 4.25 years, 8109 (27.1%) died. The causal risk ratio for mortality was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.19) for early versus nonearly initiators. The risk ratio of receiving any device-aided therapy was 3.19 (95% CI 2.56-5.80). No association was observed with incidence of PD-related complications (incidence rate ratio: 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early levodopa initiation in PD does neither postpone nor accelerate mortality or PD-related complications, nor does it precipitate earlier occurrence of PD-related complications or mortality. However, we cannot exclude that the results were influenced by residual confounding due to unmeasured risk factors of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ideal timing for initiating levodopa in newly diagnosed people with Parkinson's disease (PD) is uncertain due to limited data on the long-term effects of levodopa.

Objective: The aim was to investigate whether early levodopa initiation postpones mortality (primary outcome), the requirement of device-aided therapies, and the incidence of PD-related complications, such as fall-induced injuries.

Methods: Using nationwide claims data from Dutch hospitals (2012-2020), we grouped newly diagnosed PD individuals as "early initiators" (initiating levodopa within 2 years of diagnosis) or "nonearly initiators." We used the national death registry to assess mortality and health-care claims to assess PD-related complications and device-aided therapies. We used marginal structural models to compare mortality and device-aided therapy rates between groups, and a Poisson regression model to compare PD-related complication rates.

Results: Among 29,943 newly diagnosed PD individuals (mean age at diagnosis: 71.6, 38.5% female), there were 24,847 early and 5096 nonearly levodopa initiators. Over a median 4.25 years, 8109 (27.1%) died. The causal risk ratio for mortality was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.19) for early versus nonearly initiators. The risk ratio of receiving any device-aided therapy was 3.19 (95% CI 2.56-5.80). No association was observed with incidence of PD-related complications (incidence rate ratio: 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.05).

Conclusions: Early levodopa initiation in PD does neither postpone nor accelerate mortality or PD-related complications, nor does it precipitate earlier occurrence of PD-related complications or mortality. However, we cannot exclude that the results were influenced by residual confounding due to unmeasured risk factors of mortality.

早期左旋多巴治疗对帕金森病患者死亡率的影响。
背景:由于有关左旋多巴长期效果的数据有限,新诊断的帕金森病(PD)患者开始使用左旋多巴的理想时机尚不确定:目的:研究早期开始使用左旋多巴是否会推迟死亡率(主要结果)、对器械辅助疗法的需求以及帕金森病相关并发症(如跌倒引起的伤害)的发生率:利用荷兰全国医院的理赔数据(2012-2020 年),我们将新确诊的帕金森病患者分为 "早期启动者"(确诊后 2 年内开始使用左旋多巴)和 "非早期启动者"。我们使用全国死亡登记册来评估死亡率,并使用医疗索赔来评估与帕金森病相关的并发症和器械辅助疗法。我们使用边际结构模型来比较各组之间的死亡率和器械辅助治疗率,并使用泊松回归模型来比较与帕金森病相关的并发症发生率:在29943名新确诊的帕金森病患者(确诊时平均年龄:71.6岁,38.5%为女性)中,有24847名早期左旋多巴患者和5096名非早期左旋多巴患者。在中位数 4.25 年的时间里,有 8109 人(27.1%)死亡。早期与非早期患者的死亡因果风险比为 1.04(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.92-1.19)。接受任何设备辅助治疗的风险比为 3.19(95% CI 2.56-5.80)。与帕金森病相关并发症的发生率无关联(发生率比:1.00,95% CI 0.96-1.05):结论:早期开始使用左旋多巴治疗帕金森病既不会推迟也不会加速死亡或帕金森病相关并发症的发生,也不会提前出现帕金森病相关并发症或死亡。但是,我们不能排除由于未测量的死亡风险因素造成的残余混杂因素对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信