Electromembrane extraction of peptides based on charge, hydrophobicity, and size – A large-scale fundamental study of the extraction window

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Torstein Kige Rye, Chien-Yun Lee, Andreas Zellner, Sara Haglund Moen, Samira Dowlatshah, Trine Grønhaug Halvorsen, Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard, Frederik André Hansen
{"title":"Electromembrane extraction of peptides based on charge, hydrophobicity, and size – A large-scale fundamental study of the extraction window","authors":"Torstein Kige Rye,&nbsp;Chien-Yun Lee,&nbsp;Andreas Zellner,&nbsp;Sara Haglund Moen,&nbsp;Samira Dowlatshah,&nbsp;Trine Grønhaug Halvorsen,&nbsp;Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard,&nbsp;Frederik André Hansen","doi":"10.1002/jssc.202400292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the capability of electromembrane extraction (EME) as a general technique for peptides, by extracting complex pools of peptides comprising in total of 5953 different substances, varying in size from seven to 16 amino acids. Electromembrane extraction was conducted from a sample adjusted to pH 3.0 and utilized a liquid membrane consisting of 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether and carvacrol (1:1 w/w), containing 2% (w/w) di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate. The acceptor phase was 50 mM phosphoric acid (pH 1.8), the extraction time was 45 min, and 10 V was used. High extraction efficiency, defined as a higher peptide signal in the acceptor than the sample after extraction, was achieved for 3706 different peptides. Extraction efficiencies were predominantly influenced by the hydrophobicity of the peptides and their net charge in the sample. Hydrophobic peptides were extracted with a net charge of +1, while hydrophilic peptides were extracted when the net charge was +2 or higher. A computational model based on machine learning was developed to predict the extractability of peptides based on peptide descriptors, including the grand average of hydropathy index and net charge at pH 3.0 (sample pH). This research shows that EME has general applicability for peptides and represents the first steps toward in silico prediction of extraction efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"47 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jssc.202400292","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.202400292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the capability of electromembrane extraction (EME) as a general technique for peptides, by extracting complex pools of peptides comprising in total of 5953 different substances, varying in size from seven to 16 amino acids. Electromembrane extraction was conducted from a sample adjusted to pH 3.0 and utilized a liquid membrane consisting of 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether and carvacrol (1:1 w/w), containing 2% (w/w) di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate. The acceptor phase was 50 mM phosphoric acid (pH 1.8), the extraction time was 45 min, and 10 V was used. High extraction efficiency, defined as a higher peptide signal in the acceptor than the sample after extraction, was achieved for 3706 different peptides. Extraction efficiencies were predominantly influenced by the hydrophobicity of the peptides and their net charge in the sample. Hydrophobic peptides were extracted with a net charge of +1, while hydrophilic peptides were extracted when the net charge was +2 or higher. A computational model based on machine learning was developed to predict the extractability of peptides based on peptide descriptors, including the grand average of hydropathy index and net charge at pH 3.0 (sample pH). This research shows that EME has general applicability for peptides and represents the first steps toward in silico prediction of extraction efficiency.

Abstract Image

基于电荷、疏水性和大小的多肽电膜萃取--对萃取窗口的大规模基础研究。
本研究通过提取由 5953 种不同物质组成的复杂肽池,研究了电膜萃取(EME)作为肽的通用技术的能力,这些肽的大小从 7 个氨基酸到 16 个氨基酸不等。电膜萃取是从 pH 值调至 3.0 的样品中进行的,使用的液膜由 2-硝基苯辛基醚和香芹酚(1:1 w/w)组成,含有 2%(w/w)磷酸二(2-乙基己基)酯。接受相为 50 mM 磷酸(pH 值为 1.8),萃取时间为 45 分钟,电压为 10 V。3706 种不同肽段的萃取效率都很高,即萃取后接受相中的肽段信号高于样品中的信号。萃取效率主要受肽的疏水性及其在样品中的净电荷影响。疏水性多肽在净电荷为+1时被提取出来,而亲水性多肽在净电荷为+2或更高时被提取出来。研究人员开发了一个基于机器学习的计算模型,可根据肽的描述符(包括在 pH 3.0(样品 pH 值)条件下的亲水指数和净电荷的总平均值)预测肽的可提取性。这项研究表明,EME 对多肽具有普遍的适用性,代表着向硅学预测萃取效率迈出的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信