A theory of coverage rate differences for hearing aids around the world based on correlational observation and analysis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Earl E Johnson, Nikolai Bisgaard
{"title":"A theory of coverage rate differences for hearing aids around the world based on correlational observation and analysis.","authors":"Earl E Johnson, Nikolai Bisgaard","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2383988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to ascertain likely reasons for explaining variation in coverage rates for hearing aids (HAs) among various countries around the world.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective analysis of past coverage rates and their association to demographic and economic variables of apriori logical consideration.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Data was obtained on macroeconomic conditions from 37 countries in the OECD and estimated coverage rates for HAs using recent actual sales data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two variables were identified with a very strong correlation (R = 0.97, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95) to coverage rates. The first variable was the level of subsidy provided for the citizens to obtain HAs. The second variable was the GNI/capita which reflects the income available to citizens to make the purchase of HAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In countries where subsidy for HAs are made available through either public or private health service/insurance, an increase in coverage rates is likely to occur. The effect of subsidy is likely to surpass any effect of OTC HAs that has been demonstrated to date. Where and when feasible, subsidy presence and encouraging income generation among able citizens of a country should be sought in tandem - a complex interplay of improving coverage rates for HAs with economics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2383988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to ascertain likely reasons for explaining variation in coverage rates for hearing aids (HAs) among various countries around the world.

Design: A retrospective analysis of past coverage rates and their association to demographic and economic variables of apriori logical consideration.

Study sample: Data was obtained on macroeconomic conditions from 37 countries in the OECD and estimated coverage rates for HAs using recent actual sales data.

Results: Two variables were identified with a very strong correlation (R = 0.97, R2 = 0.95) to coverage rates. The first variable was the level of subsidy provided for the citizens to obtain HAs. The second variable was the GNI/capita which reflects the income available to citizens to make the purchase of HAs.

Conclusion: In countries where subsidy for HAs are made available through either public or private health service/insurance, an increase in coverage rates is likely to occur. The effect of subsidy is likely to surpass any effect of OTC HAs that has been demonstrated to date. Where and when feasible, subsidy presence and encouraging income generation among able citizens of a country should be sought in tandem - a complex interplay of improving coverage rates for HAs with economics.

基于相关观察和分析的全球助听器覆盖率差异理论。
目标:我们的目标是确定世界各国助听器覆盖率差异的可能原因:我们的目标是确定世界各国助听器(HAs)覆盖率差异的可能原因:研究样本:研究样本:从经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的 37 个国家获取宏观经济状况数据,并利用最近的实际销售数据估算助听器的覆盖率:结果:发现两个变量与覆盖率有很强的相关性(R = 0.97,R2 = 0.95)。第一个变量是为公民购买居屋提供的补贴水平。第二个变量是国民总收入/人均,它反映了公民可用于购买居屋的收入:结论:在通过公共或私人医疗服务/保险为健康保健提供补贴的国家,覆盖率可能会提高。补贴的效果很可能超过迄今为止已证明的非处方药物保健品的任何效果。在可行的情况下,应同时寻求补贴和鼓励有能力的公民创收--这是提高保健服务覆盖率与经济学的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信