Development of a new accurate lateral flow immunoassay for diagnosis of human leptospirosis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nazarena Pujato, Juan M Gimenez, Leandro E Peretti, Noelia Y Landolt, Paulina Jacob, Yosena T Chiani, Maria F Schmeling, Iris Miraballes, Norma B Vanasco
{"title":"Development of a new accurate lateral flow immunoassay for diagnosis of human leptospirosis.","authors":"Nazarena Pujato, Juan M Gimenez, Leandro E Peretti, Noelia Y Landolt, Paulina Jacob, Yosena T Chiani, Maria F Schmeling, Iris Miraballes, Norma B Vanasco","doi":"10.1007/s10096-024-04912-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current diagnostic methods for leptospirosis diagnosis are technically complex and expensive, with limited applicability to specialized laboratories. Furthermore, they lack diagnostic accuracy in the acute stage of the disease, which coincides with a period when antibiotics are highly effective. New simple and accurate tests are mandatory to decentralize and improve diagnosis. Here, we introduced a new lateral flow immunoassay (Lepto-LF) for human leptospirosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blinded assay using 104 serum samples from patients with confirmed or discarded diagnosis for leptospirosis. The diagnostic performance of Lepto-LF was estimated across different ranges of days from onset of symptoms (dpo), considering the diagnostic algorithm as reference standard. Additionally, it was compared with the screening methods enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM-ELISA) and the slide agglutination test using temperature-resistant antigen (SATR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lepto-LF exhibited perfect diagnostic performance with a Youden´s index J = 1 from 6 dpo in the acute phase. IgM-ELISA gave slightly lower accuracy with J = 0.91 and 95.5% of both sensitivity and specificity; while SATR showed a markedly inferior yield (J = 0.41, sensitivity = 95.5%, specificity = 45.5%). The performances remained consistent in the convalescence phase of the disease (> 10 dpo).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lepto-LF was found to be a reliable test for simple, rapid and early diagnosis of leptospirosis, resulting a promising tool for decentralizing leptospirosis diagnosis and enabling timely treatment of patients. In addition, Lepto-LF may be employed as confirmatory test, especially in remote areas and vulnerable contexts where the standard MAT is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1959-1968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04912-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The current diagnostic methods for leptospirosis diagnosis are technically complex and expensive, with limited applicability to specialized laboratories. Furthermore, they lack diagnostic accuracy in the acute stage of the disease, which coincides with a period when antibiotics are highly effective. New simple and accurate tests are mandatory to decentralize and improve diagnosis. Here, we introduced a new lateral flow immunoassay (Lepto-LF) for human leptospirosis.

Methods: We conducted a double-blinded assay using 104 serum samples from patients with confirmed or discarded diagnosis for leptospirosis. The diagnostic performance of Lepto-LF was estimated across different ranges of days from onset of symptoms (dpo), considering the diagnostic algorithm as reference standard. Additionally, it was compared with the screening methods enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM-ELISA) and the slide agglutination test using temperature-resistant antigen (SATR).

Results: Lepto-LF exhibited perfect diagnostic performance with a Youden´s index J = 1 from 6 dpo in the acute phase. IgM-ELISA gave slightly lower accuracy with J = 0.91 and 95.5% of both sensitivity and specificity; while SATR showed a markedly inferior yield (J = 0.41, sensitivity = 95.5%, specificity = 45.5%). The performances remained consistent in the convalescence phase of the disease (> 10 dpo).

Conclusion: Lepto-LF was found to be a reliable test for simple, rapid and early diagnosis of leptospirosis, resulting a promising tool for decentralizing leptospirosis diagnosis and enabling timely treatment of patients. In addition, Lepto-LF may be employed as confirmatory test, especially in remote areas and vulnerable contexts where the standard MAT is not available.

Abstract Image

开发用于诊断人类钩端螺旋体病的新型精确侧流免疫测定。
目的:目前诊断钩端螺旋体病的方法技术复杂且昂贵,对专业实验室的适用性有限。此外,这些方法在疾病的急性期缺乏诊断准确性,而急性期恰恰是抗生素非常有效的时期。为了分散和改进诊断,必须采用新的简单而准确的检测方法。在此,我们介绍了一种新的人钩端螺旋体病侧流免疫测定(Lepto-LF):方法:我们使用 104 份确诊或排除钩端螺旋体病的患者血清样本进行了双盲检测。以诊断算法为参考标准,估计了Lepto-LF在不同发病天数(dpo)范围内的诊断性能。此外,还将其与酶联免疫吸附试验(IgM-ELISA)和使用耐温抗原的玻片凝集试验(SATR)等筛查方法进行了比较:Lepto-LF具有完美的诊断性能,从急性期的6 dpo开始,Youden´s指数J = 1。IgM-ELISA的准确性稍低,J=0.91,灵敏度和特异性均为95.5%;而SATR的诊断率明显较低(J=0.41,灵敏度=95.5%,特异性=45.5%)。在疾病的恢复期(> 10 dpo),这些结果仍保持一致:结论:Lepto-LF 是一种简单、快速和早期诊断钩端螺旋体病的可靠检测方法,是分散诊断钩端螺旋体病和及时治疗患者的有效工具。此外,Lepto-LF 还可用作确诊检验,特别是在没有标准 MAT 的偏远地区和脆弱环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信